Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
  • Chapters
  • descriptions off, selected
  • captions off, selected

    Link

    Social

    Embed

    Disable autoplay on embedded content?

    Download

    Download
    Download Transcript

    [I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER]

    [00:00:07]

    EVENING AND WELCOME TO THE DECEMBER 9TH WORK SESSION OF THE EAST POINT CITY COUNCIL. MADAM DEPUTY CITY CLERK. ROLL CALL, PLEASE. COUNCIL MEMBER, SHROPSHIRE. PRESENT. COUNCIL MEMBER. FRIEDLEY. COUNCIL MEMBER. ATKINS. COUNCIL MEMBER. ZIEGLER. PRESENT. COUNCIL MEMBER. CUMMINGS. COUNCIL MEMBE. MITCHELL. COUNCIL MEMBER. BUTLER. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER MARTIN. ROGERS. PRESENT. MADAM MAYOR, YOU HAVE A QUORUM. THANK YOU SO MUCH. LET'S GO THROUGH THE PREVIOUS AGENDA ITEMS AND AGENDA ITEMS AND SEE IF ANYTHING CAN GO TO CONSENT OR IF THESE THINGS WILL BE DISCUSSED TONIGHT. SO WE'LL HAVE OUR UPDATE ON POLICING. COUNCIL

    [III.4. Council Discussion and Possible Action on Non Owner Occupied Certification]

    MEMBER BUTLER. THE NON-OWNER OCCUPIED CERTIFICATION. I DON'T THINK WE HAVE AN UPDATE. DO YOU WANT TO GO TO JANUARY WORK SESSION? NUMBER FIVE INVESTIGATION AND COUNCIL MEMBER

    [III.5. Investigation into Coucilmembers Behavior]

    HARVEY. COUNCILMAN BUTLER. OOPS. I DON'T KNOW WHY I KEEP SAYING JAM. CITY CREDIT CARD POLICY.

    [III.6. City Credit Card Policy & Travel Policy]

    OUR CITY ATTORNEY SHOULD BE HERE WITHIN AROUND SEVEN, AND OUR DEPUTY IS HERE. DO YOU ALL WANT TO DISCUSS THAT TONIGHT? I HAVEN'T LOOKED YET. I PREFER TO WAIT TILL JANUARY IF I HAVE JANUARY WORK SESSION. DOES ANYBODY OBJECT TO THAT? GOING TO JANUARY? DO WE WANT TO DISCUSS IT TONIGHT OR JANUARY? NUMBER SIX. WE CAN DO BOTH. OKAY. DEPARTMENTAL VACANCIES

    [III.7. Departmental Vacancies Discussion]

    DISCUSSION. DO WE HAVE ANY UPDATES, MISS JESSIE? MADAM MAYOR, GOOD EVENING. YES, MA'AM.

    I EMAILED OUT A AN UPDATE FOR YOU AND I ALSO HAVE HARD COPIES. IF ANYBODY HAS ANY QUESTIONS.

    OKAY. WE CAN PUT IT ON JANUARY WORK SESSION. I THINK I SAW THE EMAIL COME IN, LIKE YESTERDAY OR TODAY. YEAH. MISS JESSIE TODAY. OKAY. JANUARY WORK SESSION FOR SEVEN. COUNCIL MEMBER MARTIN ROGERS. DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF PLANNING AND ZONING. STAFF IS READY TO REPORT. LITTER PICKUP SCHEDULE. I THINK THAT PUBLIC WORKS IS ALREADY DOING A FIVE

    [III.9. Litter Pickup Schedule and a Proposal of 5 Day a Week City Wide Litter Pickup Up Schedule/And Leaf Vacuum Pickup Schedule]

    DAY A WEEK SCHEDULE THAT THEY PROPOSE THE LAST TIME THEY CAME. SO DO YOU WANT THIS TO GO TO TONIGHT OR JANUARY? WHAT DO YOU SUGGEST, MISS JESSIE? IT'S YOUR ITEM. WE'VE BEEN IN TALKS. MADAM MAYOR, WE CAN DO IT TONIGHT. OR YOU CAN WAIT UNTIL JANUARY. JANUARY? THANK YOU. LOCAL FOOD ECOSYSTEM. I THINK WE HAVE SOME UPDATES FROM STAFF ON THAT TONIGHT. THE FIXED SEWER TAP FEE FOR INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL. I THINK WE NEED A PRESENTATION ON THAT. IS SOMEBODY HERE FOR PRESENTING? FOR PRESENTATION? YES, FROM WATER AND SEWER. OKAY. YES, MA'AM. ANY OBJECTION TO

    [III.12. Council Review and Approval of Emergency Street Collapse Repairs on Piney Wood Drive Due to a Section of the Roadway that Failed While Performing Sewer Line Repairs. This is an Emergency Due to Life, Health or Safety Risk to the Public According to City Ordinance Section. 4-3306 Emergency Procurement. This Emergency Repair was Completed by Jewel of the South in the Amount Not to Exceed $214,634.11.]

    NUMBER 12 GOING TO THE CONSENT AGENDA? NO. ANY OBJECTION. TO NUMBER 13? GOING TO THE CONSENT AGENDA? WE PROBABLY NEED A PRESENTATION ON THIS. WE NEED A PRESENTATION. ITEM NUMBER 14. 14 IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IS THE APPLICANT HERE FOR 2928 PALM DRIVE? OKAY. ITEM NUMBER 15. WE NEED A PRESENTATION. IS STAFF READY FOR A PRESENTATION ON THIS? YES, MA'AM. OKAY. ITEM

    [III.16. Council Review and Approval of Emergency Repair for Sweet Water Pump Motor #4 Which Failed Due to the Motor Control Needing to be Refurbished in Order to Keep the Plant Equipment Operational. This is an Emergency Due to Life, Health or Safety Risk to the Public According to City Ordinance Section. 4-3306 Emergency Procurement. This Emergency Repair was Completed by Georgia Pump in the Amount Not to Exceed $75,875.]

    NUMBER 16. ANY OBJECTION TO THIS? GOING TO CONSENT? NO. EMERGENCY REPAIR. 17 WILL NEED TO DISCUSS AND POSSIBLY TAKE ACTION ON TONIGHT. NUMBER 18. COUNCIL MEMBER MARTIN ROGERS.

    YES. TONIGHT. NUMBER 19. ANY OBJECTION TO THIS? GOING TO CONSENT FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT? PURCHASE OF CENTER CONSOLES? NUMBER 20. ANY OBJECTION TO THIS? GOING TO CONSENT IS PRETTY LARGE AMOUNT. PROBABLY NEED A PRESENTATION ON THIS. AND THEN WE'LL HAVE HEAR FROM OUR CITY ATTORNEY ABOUT THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT RENOVATIONS. TONIGHT WE'RE GOING TO START WITH WE HAVE SOME GUESTS HERE OR PARTNERS I WANT TO CALL THEM GUESTS. PARTNERS FROM 100 BLACK MEN OF SOUTH METRO. COMING TO SHARE. AND MADAM, DEPUTY CITY CLERK, COULD YOU TURN THE PODIUM

    [00:05:01]

    BACK AROUND, PLEASE? EXCUSE ME, MADAM MAYOR. YES, COUNCILMAN. BUTLER. YES, MA'AM. AFTER YOUR PRESENTATIONS, DO YOU MIND IF I MAKE AN ANNOUNCEMENT? WELL, IT'S A WORK SESSION. WE GENERALLY DON'T DO ANNOUNCEMENTS. WHAT ANNOUNCEMENTS DO YOU NEED TO MAKE? I HAD A NOTICE FROM THE FAMILY THAT THEY WOULD LIKE FOR THE PEOPLE TO BE INFORMED ABOUT. BRADDOCK HILL'S DEATH. IF I CAN MAKE THAT PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT WITH YOUR PERMISSION. I MEAN, I THINK THE SERVICES ARE NEXT WEEK IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO MAKE IT AS FINE. NO, I I'M NOT SAYING I'M GOING TO MAKE THE ANNOUNCEMENT TONIGHT EITHER. IT'S JUST PRESENTATIONS. BUT ONCE THESE ARE DONE, GENERALLY ANNOUNCEMENTS ARE ON THE COUNCIL AGENDA. BUT ONCE THE PRESENTATIONS ARE DONE, IF YOU WANT TO ANNOUNCE IT. BUT THE SERVICES ARE NEXT WEEK, WHICH IS OUT AFTER OUR NEXT COUNCIL MEETING, WHERE ANNOUNCEMENTS ARE ON THE AGENDA. THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR.

    [III.11. Council Review and Approval to Revise the Fixed Sewer Tap Fee for Industrial & Commercial Businesses]

    MADAM DEPUTY CITY CLERK. THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER HAS INFORMED ME THAT THEY WOULD LIKE FOR ITEM NUMBER 11 TO GO TO THE JANUARY WORK SESSION, THAT SHE WOULD LIKE FOR IT TO GO TO THE

    [II.2. 100 Black Men of South Metro, Inc. Rites of Passage Academy]

    WORK SESSION. SO I'M GOING TO INVITE UP AT THIS TIME, MISTER PAUL VAUGHN AND CHRIS, WOULD COOPER COME FORWARD AT THIS TIME TO SHARE A PRESENTATION ON THE 100 BLACK MEN OF SOUTH METRO RITES OF PASSAGE ACADEMY? THERE'S ALSO ASKED THE 100 BLACK MEN HAVE BEEN EXTREMELY SUPPORTIVE OF THE WORK IN EAST POINT, BUT MORE THAN THAT HAVE GIVEN A LOT OF SERVICE TO OUR YOUTH WITHIN OUR COMMUNITY, SPECIFICALLY IN EAST POINT AND IN THE REGION. SO THEY ARE WANT TO SHARE WITH US THEIR RITES OF PASSAGE ACADEMY PROGRAM, AND THEN ALSO MAKE AN ASK OF COUNCI, PRESS THAT BUTTON RIGHT THERE ON THE BASE. ALL RIGHT. WELL, GOOD EVENING, MADAM MAYOR. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR HAVING US. I'M CHRISTOPHER COOPER, AND OF COURSE, THIS IS PAUL VAUGHN. AND ABOUT 30 MINUTES AGO, I WAS JUST ELECTED TO SERVE ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE 100 BLACK MEN OF SOUTH METRO. OUTSIDE OF MY BOARD APPOINTMENT, I HAVE THE AWESOME PLEASURE AND PRIVILEGE TO SERVE AS THE CHAIR OF OUR RITES OF PASSAGE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY, ONE OF OUR FLAGSHIP PROGRAMS THAT HELPS SHAPE YOUNG MEN INTO FUTURE LEADERS THROUGH MENTORSHIP, EDUCATION, AND LIFE SKILLS TRAINING. THE 100 BLACK MEN OF AMERICA WAS FOUNDED IN 1963 WITH A MISSION TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN OUR COMMUNITIES AND ENHANCE EDUCATIONAL AND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES FOR AFRICAN AMERICANS. FOR THE LAST 35 YEARS. OUR CHAPTER RIGHT HERE IN SOUTH METRO ATLANTA HAS AMPLIFIED OUR MISSION BY SERVING AS A BEACON OF LEADERSHIP IN THIS COMMUNITY. WE COLLECTIVELY LEVERAGE OUR DIVERSE TALENTS TO CREATE ENVIRONMENTS WHERE CHILDREN ARE MOTIVATED TO ACHIEVE AND EMPOWER INDIVIDUALS TO BECOME SELF-SUFFICIENT SHAREHOLDERS IN THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC FABRIC OF OUR COMMUNITIES. OUR COMMITMENT IS GROUNDED IN THE INTELLECTUAL DEVELOPMENT OF YOUTH AND THE ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT OF AFRICAN AMERICANS, GUIDED BY CORE VALUES OF RESPECT FOR FAMILY, SPIRITUALITY, JUSTICE AND INTEGRITY. THESE PRINCIPLES DRIVE EVERYTHING THAT WE DO FROM MENTORSHIP TO LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT, ENSURING A BRIGHTER FUTURE FOR ALL WE SERVE. LOCALL, WE OPERATE TWO IMPACTFUL MENTORSHIP PROGRAMS, ONE BEING THE RITES OF PASSAGE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY AND THE OTHER BEING OUR MIRROR MENTORSHIP PROGRAM. THROUGH MENTORSHIP AND INTENTIONAL GUIDANCE, WE'VE HELPED OUR YOUNG MEN ACHIEVE OVER $7 MILLION IN SCHOLARSHIPS, SECURE INTERNSHIPS WITH FORTUNE 500 COMPANIES, AND DEVELOP INTO CONFIDENT SERVICE ORIENTED LEADERS. THROUGH THESE INITIATIVES AND THE STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS WITH ORGANIZATIONS LIKE THE COALITION OF THE 100 BLACK WOMEN, WE OFTEN SERVE UP TO 70 OR 80 YOUNG PEOPLE AT A TIME IN OUR SATURDAY SESSIONS.

    WHILE THIS LEVEL OF ENGAGEMENT IS INSPIRING OUR CURRENT OFFICE SPACE RIGHT DOWN THE STREET IN THE BUGGY WORKS PLAZA HAS BEEN A LITTLE BIT SMALL AND CANNOT EFFECTIVELY ACCOMMODATE THE SCALE OF OUR PROGRAMING. OUR PROGRAMS HAVE PRODUCED LIFE CHANGING RESULTS. FOR EXAMPLE,

    [00:10:02]

    JEAN CRUNK WAS A PAST NATIONAL MENTEE OF THE YEAR. HE EXEMPLIFIES WHAT IS POSSIBLE WHEN YOUNG MEN ARE GIVEN MENTORSHIP AND OF COURSE, OPPORTUNITY. THROUGH OUR GUIDANCE, HE HAS ACHIEVED ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE, EARNED SIGNIFICANT SCHOLARSHIPS AND NOW IS A COMMUNITY LEADER IN HIS OWN RIGHT. PAUL VAUGHN, WHO MANY OF YOU KNOW IS A PAST CHAPTER PRESIDENT AND WAS ALSO AWARDED MENTOR OF THE YEAR NATIONALLY FOR HIS COMMITMENT TO THE WORK AND POURING INTO THESE YOUNG MEN AND WOMEN. DOCTOR MARTIN LUTHER KING JUNIOR SAID, LIFE'S MOST PERSISTENT AND URGENT QUESTION IS WHAT ARE YOU DOING FOR OTHER? THAT QUESTION INSPIRES EVERYTHING THAT WE DO AT THE 100 BLACK MEN OF SOUTH METRO ATLANTA. AND NOW WE HUMBLY ASK FOR YOUR SUPPORT IN ANSWERING THAT CALL. AS OUR PROGRAMS CONTINUE TO GROW, SO DOES THE NEED FOR ADEQUATE SPACE TO HOST LARGER EVENTS LIKE CAREER EXPOS, YOUTH LEADERSHIP SUMMITS, AND STEM WORKSHOPS. WE ENVISION A PARTNERSHIP WITH THE CITY OF EAST POINT TO PROVIDE VENUES THAT ALLOW US TO EXPAND OUR IMPACT. SUPPORTING OUR EFFORTS WILL NOT ONLY ENRICH THE LIVES OF EAST POINT AND SOUTH METRO ATLANTA YOUTH, BUT ALSO STRENGTHEN OUR SHARED COMMUNITY FABRIC. TOGETHER, WE CAN ENSURE THAT YOUNG PEOPLE IN OUR REGION SEE A PATH TO SUCCESS. SUPPORTED BY MENTORS LIKE MYSELF AND MISTER VAUGHN, WHO BELIEVE IN THEIR POTENTIAL. SO I STAND HUMBLY BEFORE YOU TODAY AND INVITE YOU TO JOIN US ON THIS MISSION BY PROVIDING SPACE FOR OUR PROGRAMS AND BECOMING AN INTEGRAL PART OF OUR TRANSFORMATIVE JOURNEY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME, ATTENTION, AND CONSIDERATION AS WE COLLECTIVELY EXPLORE HOW THE CITY OF EAST POINT CAN HELP US CONTINUE TO BUILD BRIGHTER FUTURES TOGETHER. THANK YOU. SO ULTIMATELY, AS YOU HEARD, WE'RE ACTUALLY ASKING FOR USE OF THE ANNEX OR OTHER VENUES THAT ARE A LITTLE BIT LARGER RIGHT NOW. LIKE I SAID, WE'RE IN BUGGY WORKS, SO USUALLY WE CAN PROBABLY HAVE ABOUT WHAT, 35 TO 40 PEOPLE COMFORTABLY. BUT THROUGH OUR PARTNERSHIPS AND THE GROWING OF OUR LEADERSHIP AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS, WE NEED ADDITIONAL SPACE LIKE WE USE THE ANNEX RECENTLY. AND THAT WAS LIKE A PERFECT SIZE AS WE ARE PARTNERING WITH OTHER ORGANIZATIONS AND WORKING WITH YOUNG WOMEN AND YOUNG MEN. SO WE'RE LOOKING FOR OPPORTUNITIES TO BE ABLE TO LEVERAGE THE RESOURCES OF THE CITY TO IMPACT THESE YOUTH. AND WE HAVE THE DATES. YES, YES, YES, WE HAVE A LIST. SO WE TYPICALLY MEET ON THE FIRST AND THIRD SATURDAY OF EACH MONTH. I HAVE A DO YOU WANT ME TO GO THROUGH THE LIST OF THEM NOW OR. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO THE DATES THAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE STARTING 1221, WE HAVE JANUARY 4TH, 2025, WE HAVE SATURDAY THE 18TH OF JANUARY IN 2025. WHY DON'T WE SWITCH IT. WE'LL SWITCH IT OUT FEBRUARY THE FIRST, 2025 FEBRUARY THE 15TH, 2025 MARCH THE 1ST, 2025 MARCH THE 15TH, 2025 AND MARCH THE 29TH, 2025 AND THEN THE LAST ONE FOR THIS COHORT YEAR IS APRIL THE 12TH, 2025. NOW WE DO START PROGRAMING AGAIN IN AUGUST, SO THE NEXT COHORT WILL WILL BEGIN IN AUGUS. AND WHAT TIME WE GENERALLY MEET FROM 10 A.M. TO 1 P.M. COUNCIL MEMBER BUTLER THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION. REALLY APPRECIATE IT. I GUESS THIS IS MORE MORE OF A QUESTION FOR STAFF. SO WITH MISS IRIS COMES BACK, I'LL ASK HER ABOUT OUR AVAILABILITY. OKAY. I THINK THAT'S WHAT THE CHIEF CONCERN WOULD BE. THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE NORMALLY WORKS WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO SCHEDULE THE ANNEX. SO IF WE'RE ABLE TO GET THE DATES, WE CAN VERIFY THE AVAILABILITY AND GET BACK IN TOUCH. OKAY. THANK YOU. AND I THINK FOR TONIGHT, IT WAS SHARING INFORMATION FOR COUNCIL AND THE DATES AND TIME THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO USE IT. AND ALSO TO GET THE AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY ATTORNEY AND STAFF AND CITY INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO WORK WITH THEM REGARDING AN MOU THAT WOULD ADDRESS THE DATES AND TIME AVAILABILITY AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE. I THINK SOMETIMES WHAT'S HELPFUL, INSTEAD OF LOCKING IN SPECIFIC DATES, IT'S LIKE A NUMBER OF SESSIONS OR SOMETHING BECAUSE THINGS HAPPEN. AND IF THE MOU SAYS SPECIFIC DATES, THAT'S LIKE REQUIRING US TO AMEND IT. BUT REALLY IT WAS TO SHARE FOR COUNCIL TO HEAR FROM THEM AND THEN TO SEE IF THERE WAS ANY OBJECTION TO THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. INTERIM CITY MANAGER WORKING WITH THEM ON AN

    [00:15:02]

    MOU. THAT WOULD BE BROUGHT BACK TO COUNCIL, IDEALLY MONDAY IF POSSIBLE. BUT IF NOT, WE ALSO HAVE THE WHEN. WHEN IS THE FIRST SESSION, THE NEXT ONE IS THE 21ST OF DECEMBER. OF DECEMBER? YES. YOU ALL ARE ASKING FOR THE DECEMBER LOCATION. WE DID HAVE THAT DATE USAGE AS WELL. WE DID HAVE THAT DATE. YES. SO YEAH, THE 16TH WOULD BE OUR OPPORTUNITY FOR COUNCIL TO CONSIDER THE MOU AND WHETHER OR NOT THAT WOULD BE APPROVED. UNDERSTOOD. THAT. COUNCIL MEMBER ATKINS. YES. YES. SO THESE ARE SATURDAY DATES, CORRECT? YES. OKAY. AND SO THIS IS A QUESTION OF STAFF. MISS JESSIE IS THE ANNEX NORMALLY OPEN ON SATURDAYS AS WELL? AND I ASKED THAT QUESTION BECAUSE YOUR ASK COULD BE NOT JUST SPACE BUT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE PERSONNEL THERE ALSO. YES. WELL THE BIGGEST THING THAT WE NEED IS JUST THE AV, JUST OUR CONNECTION TO THE AV. RIGHT. BUT YOU HAVE TO HAVE SOMEONE FROM EAST POINT TO OPEN. CORRECT? CORRECT, CORRECT. SO I JUST WANTED TO SEE IF THERE'S IS THAT SPACE ALWAYS OPEN ON SATURDAY OR WILL WE ALSO HAVE TO HAVE PERSONNEL THERE FOR TO ALLOW THEM ACCESS? WE WOULD HAVE SOMEONE THERE TO HANDLE THE AV AND ALSO IT IS THE HEADQUARTERS FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. SO IT'S ALREADY OPEN. YES. OKAY. BUT WE WOULD ALSO LIKE TO MAKE SURE THAT IT IS AVAILABLE BECAUSE THERE ARE SOME COMMUNITY CLASSES THAT ARE SCHEDULED. SO. RIGHT. ABSOLUTELY. WE'LL CHECK ON THE CALENDAR OKAY. OKAY. THANK YOU. AND GIVEN THAT BECAUSE I UNDERSTAND THAT THE FIRST DATE THAT THEY ARE REQUESTING IS JUST THIS MONTH AND SO WOULD YOU HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO THAT AND THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO COME BACK WITH SOMETHING? DOES THIS GIVE YOU ENOUGH TIME TO DO THOSE THINGS? ABSOLUTELY. WE CAN CHECK ON THE DATE TOMORROW AND MADAM MAYOR TALKED ABOUT DEVELOPING THE MOU TO BE BROUGHT BACK FOR NEXT MONDAY'S MEETING. SO I FEEL SURE WE CAN HAVE THAT AVAILABLE. OKAY. THANK YOU. AND WE CAN LOOK AT THE TV AND FILM PRODUCTION, WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT MOU THAT WE HAVE, WHERE PEOPLE ARE USING THE SPACE AND OTHER MOUS THAT WE HAVE FOR USAGE OF THE ANNEX. TO START WITH, I THINK THE AEROTROPOLIS ATLANTA ALLIANCE ALSO DOES A WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM THERE. SO WE COULD START WITH THAT. THAT WOULD BE AWESOME. THANK YOU. ALRIGHTY. AND WE WILL PUT IT ON. THE AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION. SO YOU ALL CAN JUST PRESENT AND AS AN AGENDA ITEM, NOT A CONSENT AGENDA ITEM. YES, MA'AM. THANK YOU SO MUCH. YES, MR. VAUGHN, I WOULD BE REMISS IF I DIDN'T SAY THIS. I THE ORGANIZATION I ACTUALLY STARTED 50 YEARS AGO, ALONG WITH A FAMOUS YOUNG MAN BY THE NAME OF JACKIE ROBINSON.

    THAT'S HOW THIS WHOLE THING GOT STARTED. IT'S BASED OFF OF FIVE PILLARS. BUT AS I SAY THAT FOR A REASON, AS I TRAVEL THE COUNTRY, AS I TRAVEL THE WORLD NOW WE HAVE 107 CHAPTERS AND THERE'S 125,000 YOUNG MEN INVOLVED IN THIS PROGRAM, AND 10,000 MEN THAT ARE MENTORS ON THE LADIES SIDE OF 66,000 YOUNG LADIES AND 6000 6600 YOUNG WOMEN THAT ARE MENTORING ALSO. BUT AS I SAY THAT AS I TRAVEL THIS COUNTRY, LET ME TELL YOU SOMETHING. THERE ARE COUNCILS LIKE THIS THAT ARE NOT THIS EASY TO WORK WITH OR POSITIVE OR SUPPORT. I'M JUST TELLING IT LIKE IT IS. AND YOUR MAYOR, SHE'S A JEWEL AND YOUR STAFF. EVERYONE WE'VE EVER WORKED FROM MISS SHROPSHIRE ALL THE WAY TO DOCTOR ROGERS. THE ONES THAT I KNOW ALREADY. BUT THESE ARE THE ONES THAT HAVE BEEN THERE. AND CITY OF EAST POINT. EAST POINT IS BLESSED BECAUSE NOT ONLY THE BIBLE TALKS ABOUT THE LEAST OF US. AND YOU CAN CALL THEM AT. I HADN'T TRIED THIS YET, BUT YOU CAN CALL THEM AT 6:00 IN THE MORNING, 7:00 IN THE MORNING, OR 11 OR 12:00 AT NIGHT. THEY'RE THERE AND THEY GET YOU AN ANSWER BACK. SO THEY CARE ABOUT THE LEAST TO THE MOST. THEY'RE THEY'RE PHENOMENAL. YOU'RE PHENOMENAL GROUP OF PEOPLE TO WORK WITH. SO YOU'RE BLESSED TO HAVE YOUR YOUR MAYOR AND I JUST WANT TO PASS THAT ON. ALRIGHT. THANK YOU ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SO MUCH. THIS WILL BE AN AGENDA ITEM, MADAM DEPUTY CITY CLERK. THANK YOU. THE NEXT ITEM IS THE POINT IN

    [II.1. Fulton County's Continuum of Care 2024 Point in Time Count]

    TIME COUNT. I BELIEVE THIS IS. WE'VE DONE THIS. MAYBE 3 OR 4 YEARS. SO ANNUALLY. HOLD ON A MINUTE. MY ANNUALLY, THE FULTON COUNTY CONTINUUM OF CARE DOES A POINT IN TIME COUNT. AND THE US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES CONTINUUM OF CARE TO CONDUCT POINT IN TIME COUNTS AS A MEANS OF DETERMINING FEDERAL FUNDING TO ADDRESS HOMELESSNESS. ENCOURAGE AND ENCOURAGES AN ANNUAL COUNT. THE COUNT DATA CREATES A SNAPSHOT OF THE SCOPE AND SCALE OF

    [00:20:02]

    HOMELESSNESS, WHICH PROVIDES POLICYMAKERS AND FUNDERS WITH CRUCIAL INFORMATION ON THE NUMBER AND DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF HOMELESS CITIZENS. THE FULTON COUNTY CONTINUUM OF CARE IS DESIGNED TO PROMOTE FULTON COUNTY CITIES, EXCLUDING ATLANTA COMMUNITY WIDE COMMITMENT TO ENDING HOMELESSNESS PROVIDE FUNDING FOR NONPROFITS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO QUICKLY REHOUSE HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES. PROMOTE ACCESS TO MAINSTREAM PROGRAMS FOR HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES, AND OPTIMIZE SELF-SUFFICIENCY AMONG INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS. THE ATLANTA'S COUNT CONTINUUM OF CARE IS INDEPENDENT FROM FULTON COUNTY'S CONTINUUM OF CARE, AND EXCLUSIVELY SUPPORTS THE WORK IN ATLANTA. AND SO WE HAVE PARTICIPATED IN WHAT PARTICIPATION HAS MEANT FOR US.

    I'VE ACTUALLY GONE OUT A COUPLE OF YEARS FOR THEM, WITH THEM, AS THEY WERE COUNTING PEOPLE EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS WITHIN THE CITY AND IN THE SOUTH. FULTON AREA. BUT ALSO OUR CITY ANNEX HAS BEEN THE PLACE WHERE THEY PROVIDE THE TRAINING AND THE PLACE WHERE THEY CONVENE ON THE NIGHT OR NIGHTS WHEN THEY'RE GOING OUT TO CANVASS THE AREA. AND SO THEY ARE ASKING THAT WE ALLOW THEM TO UTILIZE OUR CITY ANNEX. AGAIN, THIS YEAR. AND SO THE EVERY YEAR I'VE ASKED JUST SPECIFICALLY FOR THAT YEAR, I THINK THIS WE'RE AT A POINT WHERE THIS WORK IS IMPORTANT AND US BEING ABLE TO PARTNER WITH THE COUNTY IN THIS IMPORTANT WORK, I THINK, IS SOMETHING THAT WE SHOULD CONTINUE. SO I WOULD LIKE FOR COUNCIL TO AUTHORIZE OR AGREE TO ALLOW OUR CITY ATTORNEY AND INTERIM CITY MANAGER OUR STAFF TO WORK WITH THEM TO COME UP WITH AN MOU. SO THIS WOULD BE SOMETHING ANNUAL. WE DON'T HAVE TO COME BACK EACH YEAR TO ASK FOR THEM TO BE ABLE TO UTILIZE THE SPACE. THIS YEAR, THE DATE THAT THEY HAVE IT. SO IT HAPPENS IN JANUARY AND THE DATE THAT THEY HAVE IN MIND OR DATES IS JANUARY. THE 22ND, FROM 4:30 P.M. TO 3:00 AM. THEY HAVE AROUND CLOSE TO 100 PEOPLE WHO VOLUNTEER. THEY WOULD NEED SUPPORT WITH TABLES AND CHAIRS AND STAFF IS ENSURED THAT THOSE THAT EQUIPMENT WOULD BE THERE IN THE PAST AND AGAIN, I THINK ONE YEAR WE ALSO HOSTED THE TRAINING. SO THEY DO TRAINING FOR PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY GO OUT WITH THEM AS WELL. AND SO TONIGHT IS TO BRING THIS ANNUAL PARTNERSHIP THAT WE'VE DONE BACK TO COUNCIL, AND THEN TO ASK THAT OR SEE IF ANYONE HAS AN OBJECTION TO THE CITY ATTORNEY AND THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER WORKING WITH THE FULTON COUNTY CONTINUUM OF CARE ON AN MOU THAT WOULD ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN ANNUALLY. NO COUNCIL MEMBER. SHROPSHIRE. THANK YOU. IS THAT A MOTION OR. WELL, TONIGHT IS IF ANYONE HAS ANY OBJECTION, WE CAN TALK THROUGH THAT. BUT REALLY WE NEED THE STAFF TO WORK WITH THEM TO BRING IT BACK TO US LIKE WE JUST DID WITH THE 100 BLACK MEN.

    OKAY, WELL, YEAH, THAT'S THAT'S THE ASK FOR TONIGHT SO WE CAN HAVE MORE INFORMATION. OKAY. SO THAT'S FINE. COUNCIL MEMBER ATKINS. YES. SO, MADAM MAYOR IS THE IN TERMS OF YOUR ASK FOR OR DIRECTIVE FOR STAFF TO WRITE THE MOU. DRAFT MOU, WE'RE SPEAKING OF THE SPACE, THE USE OF SPACE AND THE USE OF EQUIPMENT THAT'S ALREADY ON HAND. SO IN SUBSEQUENT YEARS, IF THERE ARE OTHER NEEDS THAT THEY HAVE, WE WON'T BE COMMITTING TO THAT. BUT WE'LL BE COMMITTING TO PROVIDING THE SPACE AND THE EQUIPMENT THAT WE ALREADY HAVE ON HAND. OKAY. AND I MEAN, THAT'S A GOOD POINT.

    IF THEY NEEDED SOMETHING ADDITIONAL, WE COULD BRING IT BACK TO SHARE THAT UPDATE WITH COUNCIL. BUT I BELIEVE THIS IS EITHER OUR THIRD OR FOURTH YEAR, AND IT'S JUST REALLY BEEN THE SPACE, THE TABLES AND CHAIRS. AND THEY BRING IN ALL THE STAFF, ALL OF THEY HAVE VANS AND STUFF THAT THEY DRIVE PEOPLE AROUND IN. IF THEY DO TRAINING, THEY'LL USE OUR AUDIO VISUAL. BUT OUTSIDE OF THAT, THERE HASN'T BEEN ANY. BUT IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT IT MIGHT NOT ARISE. COUNCIL MEMBER MARTIN ROGERS YES, I WAS GOING TO GO AHEAD AND MAKE THE MOTION. IS ANYONE IN FOR? WELL, SO I THINK FOR TONIGHT WE JUST WANT TO SEE IF ANYONE HAS ANY OBJECTION WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY. AND, AND THEN WE'LL BE ON THE AGENDA FOR MONDAY WITH THE POTENTIAL MOU FOR THEM TO BE ABLE TO UTILIZE THE SPACE AGAIN, THEY'RE LOOKING AT WHAT DID I SAY JANUARY 25TH, 10TH, MAY 22ND, 2025. ANOTHER QUESTION. COUNCILMEMBER MARTIN ROGERS AND MADAM MAYOR, HOW LONG IS THE CITY OF EAST POINT HAD THIS PARTNERSHIP? 3 OR 4 YEARS. OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU

    [00:25:02]

    ALL SO MUCH. WE WILL NOW GO TO I THINK WE HAVE. ITEM 14. WE HAVE AN APPLICANT HERE. EXCUSE ME.

    MAYOR COUNCIL MEMBER BUTLER. THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. I APPRECIATE THIS BREAKING THE QUORUM TO MAKE THIS ANNOUNCEMEN. EXCUSE ME. MISS, WITH SAD WITH A HEAVY HEART THAT I ANNOUNCED THAT OUR FORMER COLLEAGUE STEPHANIE GORDON'S FATHER, JOHN E GORDON SENIOR, PASSED ON DECEMBER 8TH IN THE MORNING FROM A ILLNESS. AND THE SERVICES WILL BE HELD IN ALABAMA ON FRIDAY.

    AND WITH SHARON SHROPSHIRE'S, COUNCILWOMAN SHROPSHIRE'S PERMISSION, I KNOW SHE WAS WAS MADE AWARE OF THIS TOO. WE HAD ANOTHER DEATH OF A STALWART IN THE COMMUNITY AS WELL, AND IT WAS ASKED OF BOTH OF US. SO I'M GOING TO INCLUDE HER WITH HER, WITH HER PERMISSION TO READ THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT. BASED FROM THE FAMILY, THE EAST POINT PRINTING COMPANY ANNOUNCES THE DEATH OF FOUNDER BRADDOCK HILL DECEMBER 9TH, 2024. IS WITH GREAT SADNESS THAT WE ANNOUNCE THAT BRADDOCK HILL TRANSITIONED ON THURSDAY, DECEMBER 5TH AFTER A BRIEF ILLNESS. ALONG WITH HIS WIFE, CAROLYN, BRADDOCK FOUNDED THE EAST POINT PRINTING COMPANY IN EAST POINT, GEORGIA IN 1979.

    A NATIVE OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, BRADDOCK WAS A DEVOTED HUSBAND, FATHER, CHURCH SERVANT, AND COMMUNITY LEADER. WITH A CULMINATION OF OVER 60 YEARS IN THE PRINTING INDUSTRY, MR. HILL ENDURED SERVICE IN THE EAST POINT COMMUNITY FOR OVER 35 YEARS. HIS CLIENTS INCLUDES LOCAL, NATIONAL ELECTED OFFICIALS, GOVERNMENT ENTITIES, EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, CLERG, ETC. A MEMORIAL GUEST BOOK IS AVAILABLE AT EAST POINT PRINTING, 2759 CHURCH STREET, EAST POINT, GEORGIA, 30344 MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, 10:10 A.M. TO 6 P.M. FOR ALL THOSE TO SHARE THEIR MESSAGES OF CONDOLENCES. HIS FUNERAL WILL BE ON WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 18TH, 2024. AND SO WITH COUNCILWOMAN SHROPSHIRE'S PERMISSION. AND THE FAMILY WANTED US TO MAKE SURE THAT PEOPLE KNEW THAT. SO THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME THIS BREAK IN THE QUORUM. MAKE THOSE SAD ANNOUNCEMENTS TO THE PEOPLE OF EAST POINT. DEFINITELY OUR DEEPEST SYMPATHY AND CONDOLENCES TO FORMER COUNCIL MEMBER STEPHANIE GORDON ON THE TRANSITIONING OF HER FAMILY AND HER FATHER, AND TO THE HILL FAMILY AND ON THE TRANSITIONING OF MR. BRADDOCK HILL, WHO WAS DEFINITELY A PILLAR IN OUR COMMUNITY AS THE COMMUNITY. JOIN US IN PRAYERS FOR PEACE, STRENGTH AND COMFORT FOR THEM AND THEIR FAMILIES DURING THIS DIFFICULT TIME. WE. ITEM NUMBER 14 THAT HAS SOMEONE, A NON STAFF PERSON HERE. THERE'S AN APPLICANT. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER ITEMS THAT HAVE NON STAFF. MISS JESSIE? NO. MADAM MAYOR OKAY SO WE WILL I SEE A LOT OF GUESTS IN THE AUDIENCE THAT THEY'RE NOT ON ANY OF THESE OTHER CONTRACTS OR ITEMS. OKAY.

    [III.14. P2024RZ-006-08 Rezoning Request for Property Located at 2928 Palm Drive from R1-A District to R-3 District (PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED) Presented by: Planning & Community Development]

    THIS IS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR THEM TO GO FIRST. WE'LL START WITH ITEM 14 THOUGH. STAFF WILL COME UP FIRST AND PROVIDE AN OVERVIEW. MISS SMITH.

    GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. IN REFERENCE TO REZONING CASE NUMBER P2024-006-08. IT'S A REZONING REQUEST. IT'S A REZONING REQUEST FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2928 PALM DRIVE. THE REQUEST IS A REZONING FROM R1 TO R3 FOR DUPLEX SINGLE FAMILY PROPERTY. THE CURRENT ZONING OF

    [00:30:15]

    THE PROPERTY IS R1, A, WHICH IS OUR URBAN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. IT'S A PICTURE OF THE PARCEL MAP. THE PROPERTY HAS A FUTURE LAND USE MAP REDEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD CLASSIFICATION, AND SOME OF THE TYPICAL ZONING DISTRICTS IN THE REDEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD. IT'S R1, RL, R1, A, R, T TWO, AND R3. THE USE AND SCALES FOR LIMITED MULTI-FAMILY DUPLEX, TRIPLEX AND QUADPLEX. THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED DENIAL OF THIS REZONING FROM R1, A URBAN RESIDENTIAL, TO R3 MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT, AT THE OCTOBER 17TH, 2024 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING, AND THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT. THE STAFF ALSO RECOMMEND DENIAL. YES, STAFF RECOMMENDED DENIAL AS WEL. WHAT'S THE APPLICANT'S NAME AGAIN? MR. KEITH LOGAN, MR. LOGAN, IF YOU LIKE BOTH STAFF AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, WE'VE GOT SOME STAFF AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ARE RECOMMENDING DENIAL. SO IF YOU WANT TO COME UP AND SHARE ANY INFORMATION WITH COUNSEL, YOU CAN AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. COUNSEL. MY NAME IS KEITH LOGAN. AND AGAIN, THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION IS 2928 PALM DRIVE ORIGINALLY. OR AS IT STANDS NOW, IT IS ALL ONE. BUT I WAS REQUESTING FOR A REZONING TO BE R3 BECAUSE THERE'S TWO PROPERTIES ON THE PARCEL. SO MY SON RESIDES IN THE FRONT HOUSE AND THEN IN THE REAR HOUSE IS BASICALLY AN APARTMENT UPSTAIRS APARTMENT. AND BEFORE IT WAS UNDER CONTRACT FOR SALE. BUT THEY COULD NOT GET THE FINANCING BECAUSE OF THE ZONING ISSUE, SO THEY WOULD ONLY RECOGNIZE JUST IT AS A SINGLE FAMILY AND NOT AS A DUPLEX PROPERTY. SINCE THEN, THE SALE FELL THROUGH, WHICH I'M I'M GLAD IT DID BECAUSE I DO WANT TO KEEP THE PROPERTY, BUT I DO PLEAD WITH THE COUNCIL TO CHANGE THE ZONING BECAUSE IT'S REALLY AFFECTING THE BOTTOM DOLLAR AS FAR AS THEIR ONLY RECOGNIZING JUST A SINGLE PROPERTY THAT I, YOU KNOW, INVESTED A LOT OF MONEY INTO.

    AND I CANNOT GET ANY FUNDING WITH IT'S ZONED AS A EVEN RECOGE BACK UNIT. SO I'M PLEADING WITH THE SO AND I'M WORKING OUT SOMETHING WITH MY SON TO BE ACTUALLY TO BE ABLE TO BUY THE PROPERTY FOR ME. SO AS SOON AS HE GETS SOME OF HIS SCHOOL DEBTS PAID DOWN, THAT'S THE GOAL.

    THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MISS SMIT. HOW LONG IS THE OTHER UNIT BEEN IN THE BACK? AND IS IT? NO. MISS SMITH FROM PLANNING AND ZONING. HOW LONG IS THE OTHER UNIT BEEN IN THE BACK, AND IS IT LARGER THAN THE 50% OF THE MAIN HOUSE SUCH THAT IT WOULDN'T BE AN ACCESSORY DWELLING STRUCTURE? I MEAN, I CAN I'M SORRY. LET ME CHECK IN THE COUNCIL MEMBER. BUTLER. I'LL COME TO YOU WHEN I STARTED THE QUESTIONING, THERE WERE NO THERE WAS NO ONE IN. SO I'LL COME TO YOU IN A SECOND.

    TAKE YOUR TIME. THIS IS LARGER, AND IT DOES PREDATE THE OCTOBER 2007. SO THAT'S HOW.

    [00:35:13]

    63 THE TAX RECORDS, FULTON COUNTY TAX RECORDS PROVIDES FOR THIS PROPERTY AS MULTIFAMILY, IT RECOGNIZES, IS AT AS MULTIFAMILY. AND IT WAS APPROVED THROUGH THE BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS. MANY, MANY YEARS BEFORE WE WERE HERE, PROBABLY BEFORE ALL OF US WERE HERE. SO IT'S IT WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS DONE PRIOR TO US BEING HERE. AND SO THE HISTORY OF IT. AS A SINGLE FAMILY WITH A WITH A DUPLEX IN THE BACK, IT PREDATES AS. SO WHEN I LOOK AT IT ON EITHER GOOGLE MAPS, IT'S SHOWING A YELLOW HOUSE. IS THAT STILL THE CURRENT STRUCTURE THAT'S CURRENTLY THERE? IS THIS HAS THIS ALREADY BEEN RENOVATED? THE HOUSE HAS ALREADY BEEN RENOVATED. STAFF DID HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO A SITE VISIT, AND THE HOUSE HAS BEEN UPDATED AND RENOVATED. IT'S A WHITE HOUSE. BOTH STRUCTURES ARE WHITE AND THEY'VE BEEN RENOVATED. SO WAS THIS ON A PREVIOUS AGENDA? AND GOT MOVED OVER? I FEEL LIKE WE HAVE DISCUSSED IT. I REMEMBER WAS ON NOVEMBER'S. THIS WAS NOVEMBER'S THIS WAS ON NOVEMBER'S MEETING FOR A REZONING AND THE APPLICANT WAS NOT PRESENT. AND SO BEFORE ANY DECISIONS AND ACTIONS WERE TAKEN BY THIS BOARD, WE RECOMMENDED TO DEFER IT TO TODAY SO THE APPLICANT CAN HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO COME BEFORE THE BOARD AND ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS OR DETAILS. SO WE'VE ALREADY HAD THE PUBLIC HEARING WE HAVE. THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT. OKAY COUL MEMBER ATKINS. AND THEN COUNCIL MEMBER MITCHELL. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. GOOD. HOW ARE YOU? SO WHY WOULDN'T THIS JUST BE A SIMPLE NONCONFORMING. WE BRING IN THE CODE. I'M SORRY. EXCUSE ME? THE ZONING UP TO CONFORMING USE. BECAUSE IT LOOKS LIKE THIS PROPERTY HAS BEEN USED IN THAT MANNER BASED UPON WHAT YOU JUST SAID AND BASED UPON THE RENOVATED PICTURES. SO WHY WOULDN'T THE STAFF GO AHEAD AND APPROVE THIS JUST TO BRING THIS INTO CONFORMING USE FOR THE ZONING AS OPPOSED TO JUST DENYING IT? STAFF DOESN'T HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO APPROVE IT. IT WOULD HAVE TO BE APPROVED AND ACTION WOULD BE HAVE TO HAVE TO BE TAKEN BY COUNCIL, WHICH IS WHY THEY'RE HERE THIS EVENING FOR THE REZONING. LET ME REPHRASE THE QUESTION. WE'VE HAD INSTANCES WHERE PROPERTIES NEEDED TO BE REZONED IN ORDER TO COME UP TO THE CURRENT ZONING, BUT IT WAS A NON-CONFORMING USE AND WE WERE JUST MAKING IT CONFORMING. AND THE REASON WHY WE DO THAT IS PER WHAT THE APPLICANT SAID, SO THAT HE CAN GET FINANCING, OR SO THAT HE CAN EVEN GET THE PROPERTY INSURED.

    SO WHY WOULD THE STAFF NOT RECOMMEND, AS THEY'VE DONE IN THE PAST, THAT? BUT THIS IS JUST A PROPERTY THAT NEEDS TO COME IN CONFORMING USE WITH THE ZONING IS THERE. I'M TRYING TO RECONCILE THE DIFFERENCE HERE BECAUSE TO WHAT? BASED UPON YOUR TESTIMONY, YOU JUST MENTIONED THAT THIS PREDATES US. YOU KNOW, THE RENOVATION, THE ADDITION OF THE HABITABLE STRUCTURE IN THE REAR. SO WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE? THE DIFFERENCE IN WHY YES, WE AE THIS BECAUSE WE'RE TRYING TO BRING THIS UP TO CONFORMING USE AS AN IMPASSE. WAS THERE SOMETHING THAT MADE YOU NOT DO THAT AT THIS TIME, BASED ON THE ANALYSIS AND THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES? IT'S MULTIFAMILY. IT COULD APPEAR THAT WE'RE SPOT ZONING BECAUSE IT'S SURROUNDED BY R-1, A SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, SMALL BUNGALOW TYPE OF HOMES AND SO FOR THOSE PURPOSES, WE WENT WITH THESE PROPERTIES THAT WE'VE HAD IN THE PAST. WE'VE ALLOWED PROPERTIES ALL OVER THE CITY TO PUT IN HABITABLE STRUCTURES IN THE REAR, OR ADD IT TO THE PROPERTY. VIEWING THE PICTURES, I DON'T SEE WHY THIS WOULD BE DIFFERENT OTHER THAN THE SIZE. AND SO I GUESS MY QUESTION IS, OR MY CONCERN IS THIS WAS SOMETHING TO WHAT YOU HAPPENED MAYBE IN THE 60S. THERE WERE I THINK I HEARD YOU SAY THAT WERE POOL WHICH ALLOWED FOR THIS TO HAPPEN, WHICH PREDATES US. SO WHY WOULD WE NOT GIVE THIS PERSON THE PERMISSION TO KEEP THIS STRUCTURE? AND IT'S ALREADY BEEN RENOVATED AND ALL OF THAT. EVERYTHING PREDATES US. IT SEEMS LIKE THERE WAS AN ERROR MADE IN THE PAST. IT PREDATES US. SO I MEAN, WE REALLY DON'T KNOW. WE DON'T KNOW. WE JUST HAVE TO GO BY THE INFORMATION THAT WE HAVE. OKAY. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER ADAM. YES. JUST GOING TO PROVIDE A BIT OF CONTEXT, AND I MAY BE ABLE TO ANSWER SOME OF THE QUESTIONS THAT COUNCIL MEMBER BUTLER HAS

    [00:40:01]

    AS WELL. AND ALSO, MADAM MAYOR DID ALLUDE, WE DO ALLOW ADUS WITHIN THE CITY OF EASTPOINTE AND PARTICULARLY IN THIS CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT, WHICH IS R-1. A THE REASON THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION VOTED TO DENY THIS APPLICATION IS BECAUSE IT'S SOMETHING OTHER. THE PROCESS IS DIFFERENT THAN WHAT YOU'RE SPEAKING OF. COMMISSIONER, COUNCILMAN BUTLER, THE STAFF DOES NOT HAVE THE ABILITY UNILATERALLY TO CHANGE REZONINGS IN THE CITY OF EASTPOINTE. THAT MUST GO THROUGH THE PROCESS, THAT EVERY SINGLE REZONING MUST GO THROUGH. MISTER LOGAN IS NOT ASKING STAFF FOR A GRANDFATHERED USE OF THE ADU. WHAT HE'S ASKING IS THAT THIS CITY REZONES THE PROPERTY FROM R1 TO R3, WHICH IS THEN MULTIFAMILY. WE, AS THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AT THAT TIME VOTED TO DENY THIS APPLICATION BECAUSE THAT WOULD MAKE THAT SINGLE PROPERTY MULTIFAMILY IN THE MIDST OF AN R1 DISTRICT. WHAT WE DID SHARE WITH MISTER LOGAN, AND WE TRIED TO WORK THIS THROUGH THE ATTORNEY AT THE TIME, ATTORNEY WIGGINS. WE ACTUALLY DEFERRED THIS CASE. WE ASKED MR. LOGAN HE COULD BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE IF HE LIVED WITHIN THE PROPERTY, THEN THE UNIT BEHIND IT WOULD BECOME AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT TO THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. BUT HE DOES NOT LIVE IN THE PROPERTY AND SO STAFF CAN'T GRANDFATHER IT EITHER, BECAUSE IT IS CURRENTLY WITHOUT A PERMIT TO OPERATE AS AN ADU. IF MR. LOGAN LIVED WITHIN THE PROPERTY, THE PROPERTY COULD REMAIN R1 A IT WOULD BE COMPLIANT WITH ALL OF THE OTHER PROPERTIES AROUND IT AND THEN HE COULD COME BEFORE THE CITY AND ASK FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ADU. THE BANKS WOULD THEN RECOGNIZE THAT, BUT FOR HIM, THAT'S NOT HIS REQUEST. HIS REQUEST IS FOR US TO REZONE THIS, WHICH IS VERY DIFFERENT. SO AT THAT TIME THOSE PROPERTIES COULD BE TORN DOWN AND THEN THEY COULD BUILD MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURES IN THE MIDDLE OF AN R1 DISTRICT. AND SO THAT'S WHY THE COMMISSION DENIED IT. AND I ALSO BELIEVE THAT THAT'S WHY STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO NOT TO DENY AS WELL. THANK YOU FOR THAT. LET ME RAISE THIS MEMBER, MITCHELL. I'LL GO TO COUNCIL MEMBER MITCHELL. HE WAS IN AND THEN I'LL I'LL COME BACK. I GUESS. AM I HEARING THIS CORRECTLY? SO AT SOME POINT, DID YOU SAY IT WAS A MULTIFAMILY OR ZONED FOR MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT? NO, I DID NOT. SO WHAT WAS GRANDFATHERED IN OR NOTHING? NOTHING. THAT WAS MY MAIN QUESTION. I'M JUST TRYING TO CLARIFY THAT. AND IS HE TRYING TO SELL THIS AS TWO DIFFERENT PROPERTIES OR. NO, I DON'T KNOW.

    OKAY. THANK YOU. COUNCILMAN DIRECTOR. THANK YOU, DIRECTOR SMITH. WHAT WERE YOUR REASONS? WHAT WERE PLANNING AND ZONING REASONS FOR DENYING THE APPLICANT FOR THE NIGHT? I HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT. SORRY FOR DENYING THE APPLICATION. BASED ON THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. THIS PROPERTY SITS IN THE MIDDLE OF R1 ZONED PROPERTY, WHICH IS SINGLE FAMILY. IF YOU RIDE THROUGH THE COMMUNITY, THROUGH THE NEIGHBORHOOD, IT'S MOSTLY SMALL BUNGALOW STYLE HOUSES, SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AND TO DEVELOP OR TO PROVIDE FOR THIS SINGLE PROPERTY TO BE ZONED MULTI-FAMILY. IF ANYTHING CHANGED IN THE MIDDLE, SAY THEY WANTED TO DEMOLISH IT, THEY COULD BUILD A APARTMENT BUILDING. THEY COULD BUILD ANY TYPE OF APARTMENT STYLE BUILDING WITH HIGHER DENSITY THAT IS CURRENTLY SET AND SET IN PLACE FOR THAT PARTICULAR AREA ON THAT STREET, AND WE JUST WOULD NOT ALLOW FOR SPOT ZONING TO OCCUR.

    SO STAFF RECOMMENDED DENIAL OF IT. BUT YOU COULD GET YOU COULD HAVE DID IT WITH RECOMMENDATIONS WITH RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE PROPERTY. YEAH. CONDITIONS. YEAH. WITH CONDITIONS.

    RECOMMENDATION FOR I MEAN CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL LIKE WHEN YOU APPROVE THINGS IN THE PAST IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN UNDER THESE CONDITIONS RIGHT HERE X Y Z YOU YOU CAN'T REBUILD IT FOR APARTMENT. YOU CAN'T DO THIS. YOU CAN'T DO THAT BECAUSE THIS THIS IS STRICTLY ZONED FOR THAT RIGHT THERE. AND MY QUESTION TO THE APPLICANT AND I BELIEVE HE SAID THAT HIS SON LIVES IN THE BACK IS THE APARTMENT IS THE HOME BECOMING A DUPLEX HOME OR IT'S JUST IS IT MULTIFAMILY BECAUSE OF THE WHAT'S IN THE BACK OF IT? WHAT WHAT EXACTLY? THERE'S ACTUALLY TWO STRUCTURES ON THE PARCEL. SO THERE'S A FRONT HOUSE WHICH MY SON RESIDES IN. AND THEN THE BACK HOUSE IS THE UPSTAIRS APARTMENT AREA. THERE'S A HOUSE IN THE FRONT, AND THEN THERE'S A STRUCTURE IN

    [00:45:06]

    THE BACK. YES. SO BASICALLY IT'S WHAT THE CITY ALREADY APPROVED IN THE PAST WHEN YOU HAVE PEOPLE COMING TO SAY THEY'RE BUILDING A MOTHER IN LAW SUITE OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. AT THE TIME THAT THE APPLICANT CAME THROUGH THE PROCESS, THEY DID NOT HAVE THEY DIDN'T LIVE ON SITE. SO WE WEREN'T IN A POSITION TO SAY, HEY, WHY DON'T YOU COME THROUGH FOR A SPECIAL USE FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE? BECAUSE THEY DID NOT HAVE SOMEONE THAT WAS RESIDING IN THE PROPERTY. SO WE WENT FORWARD WITH THE APPLICATION AS IT WAS PRESENTED. SO WILL WILL YOUR SO YOU SAY YOUR SON IS IN THE BACK? NO, MY SON IS IN THE FRONT. YOU'RE IN THE HE'S IN THE FRONT. WHO'S GOING TO BE IN THE BACK? HE HAS A RENTER IN THE BACK. SO IT'S LIKE A DUPLEX. OKAY. THANK YOU. COUNCILMEMBER BUTLER THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. THIS THIS QUESTION IS FOR MY COLLEAGUE. I APPRECIATE YOUR BACKGROUND. AND I ALSO HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT, TOO. SO IN THE PAST IF THIS WAS A DUPLEX, WHAT WOULD IT BE ZONED. IT WOULD THEN BE MULTI-FAMILY WHICH IS WHICH IS WHAT HE'S TRYING TO DO NOW, WHICH IS CORRECT. HE'S TRYING TO MAKE IT A MULTIFAMILY ZONED LOT IN THE MIDDLE OF A SINGLE FAMILY ZONED LOT. AND SO WE TRIED NOT TO SPOT ZONE BECAUSE IT COULD IMPACT THE QUALITY OF LIFE. SO LET'S SAY ON YOUR STREET WHERE YOU LIVE, IF ALL OF THOSE HOUSES ARE ZONED R-1, MEANING ONE STRUCTURE, AND THEN THE NEIGHBOR NEXT DOOR HAD A STRUCTURE IN THE BACK, DID NOT GET THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO HAVE IT, AND THEN TRIED TO SELL IT IN THE BANK, DID WHATEVER MR. LOGAN SAID. AND THEN THEY, YOUR NEIGHBOR, CAME TO THE CITY AND SAID, I WANT YOU TO REZONE THIS R-3. SO IF THE CITY REZONED THAT R-3, THEN AN APARTMENT BUILDING COULD BE BUILT NEXT DOOR TO YOUR HOUSE. LET ME RAISE A QUESTION. THANK YOU. SO. WELL, I GUESS THIS QUESTION, WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE, THEN, BETWEEN A HABITABLE STRUCTURE WHICH A LOT OF PEOPLE GET APPROVED FOR, AND THEN WHAT HE'S REQUESTING? AND WHY WOULD THIS NOT BE THE SAME? OR WHY WOULDN'T IT CANNOT BE JUST A HABITABLE STRUCTURE. SO I'M A SO WE GENERALLY DON'T GO BACK AND FORTH WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS IN A Q&A. OKAY. BUT I WILL SAY AS STAFF HAS ALREADY SAID, THE ISSUE IS HIS SON DOESN'T OWN THE HOUSE. HE DOES. SO HIS SON IS NOT THE OWNER. AND HE'S LIVING IN THE HOUSE. IF HIS SON WERE THE OWNER, HE COULD APPLY FOR A HABITABLE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AND THERE WOULDN'T BE AN ISSUE BECAUSE WE WOULDN'T CHANGE THE ZONING FROM R1. A WE WOULD BE CHANGING, ALLOWING A USE THAT WE ALLOW OFTEN IN THE CITY. HIS ASK FOR R3 ALLOWS THEM. TODAY HE'S SAYING THIS, BUT THINGS COULD CHANGE. HE COULD SELL IT TO SOMEBODY. THEY COULD PUT AN APARTMENT COMPLEX THERE. AND SO I THINK COUNCIL MEMBER ATKINS MENTIONED THAT PLANNING AND ZONING HAD TRIED TO WORK WITH HIM AROUND THE HABITABLE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE OPTION, BUT R3 IN THE HOW MANY APARTMENT UNITS CAN BE ON THE R? MISS SMITH. WAS TRYING TO FIND IN THE CODE. I WAS JUST LOOKING AT ABOUT TO LOOK AT DEFINITIONS LIKE THAT'S A LOT OF DENSITY. IT DEPENDS ON THE SIZE OF THE PROPERTY, BUT THE UNITS HAVE TO BE 800FT■!S IN SIZE, AND THE PROPERTY HAS TO BE FOR OUR THREE. I BELIEVE IT'S 14,000FT■. THE ACTUAL PROPERTY HAS TO BE 14,000FT■!S MINIMUM. YES, MA'AM.

    SO THIS I'M STILL SO, MISS SMITH, WHAT CAN WE DO SO THIS GENTLEMAN CAN GET FINANCING AND CAN GET INSURANCE ON THIS PROPERTY? I THINK THE QUESTION IS WHEN YOU PURCHASE THE HOUSE, IT WAS A R1, A ZONING ON IT, RIGHT? YES. YES, IT WAS. SO IT WAS ZONED FOR SINGLE FAMILY. IT WAS. YES. YES. BUT MY QUESTION STILL STANDS. WHAT CAN WE DO TO MAKE HIS HOME COMPLIANT? FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, HE WOULD HAVE TO LIVE IN THE PROPERTY. HE WOULD NEED TO COME THROUGH FOR A SPECIAL USE APPLICATION. IF HE'S TRYING TO USE IT AS A RENTAL PROPERTY. I MEAN, THE CODE JUST

    [00:50:05]

    DOES NOT. SO. SO LET ME LET ME SAY IT ANOTHER WAY THAT IF I OWN THE PROPERTY AND THEN I SOLD THE PROPERTY, I THEN THAT WHOEVER RECEIVES THAT PROPERTY STILL HAS THE BENEFIT OF IN WHAT'S IN EFFECT, TWO UNITS HIS HOME, AND THEN HE CAN RENT OUT THE BACK HOUSE WITH A SPECIAL USE RIGHT.

    SO I DON'T SEE WHY THIS IS NOT DIFFERENT IF BECAUSE THE CITY THIS IS A PROBLEM WE'RE TRYING TO FIX, THAT HAPPENED. I THINK YOU SAID 1963. I THINK THAT'S WHEN THE PROPERTY WAS FIRST CONSTRUCTED. AND SO THERE'S A MISTAKE THAT NEEDS TO BE RECTIFIED. I COULD UNDERSTAND THE ARGUMENT AGAINST MULTIFAMILY UNITS, BUT WE STILL IT WOULD BE DERELICT IF WE DON'T GIVE THIS BROTHER WHAT HE NEEDS TO BE COMPLIANT SO THAT HE CAN ADEQUATELY INSURE THE PROPERTY AND OR RECEIVE FINANCING FOR THAT PROPERTY. SO WHAT I THINK I HEARD YOU SAY IS IF HE GETS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, THEN HE CAN DO IT. NOW LET ME WAIT. LET ME ADD TO THAT. THEN IT GOES BACK TO MY ORIGINAL EQUATION. AND THE FACT THAT IF I BOUGHT THE HOUSE AND I BUILT A HABITABLE STRUCTURE, I GOT A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. THEN I SOLD IT TO SOMEONE ELSE. THEY STILL HAVE THE BENEFIT OF WHAT I DID. AND SO WE I UNDERSTAND THE TECHNICAL PART OF WHAT'S BEING SAID, BUT THAT'S WHY I COME TO COUNCIL SO THAT WE CAN DIG IN THE WEEDS A LITTLE BIT AND HOW WE CAN FIX THIS, BECAUSE WHAT I'M ASKING FOR, AND MAYBE YOU DON'T HAVE THE ANSWER TONIGHT. WE EITHER GRANT HIM THE ZONING WITH SPECIAL CONDITIONS. AS COUNCILWOMAN SHROPSHIRE SAID, OR BECAUSE THIS WOULD BE A SPOT ZONING PROBLEM OR WE GIVE HIM THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT SO THAT WE RECTIFY WHAT HAPPENED IN 1963. UNFORTUNATELY, THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT, HE DOESN'T QUALIFY FOR THAT BECAUSE HE DOESN'T RESIDE IN IT. SO THAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EVERYBODY ELSE GETTING THEM GOING THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE PROCESS. HE DOESN'T LIVE THERE. IT'S AN INVESTMENT PROPERTY. IT'S A RENTAL PROPERTY. SO BUT BUT BUT DO YOU SEE THE YOU SEE THE CONUNDRUM. BECAUSE IF I BOUGHT THE PROPERTY FROM HIM AND HE STAYED THERE AND HE HAD THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT, AND IF I BOUGHT IT FROM HIM, THEN I GET THE BENEFIT OF THAT HABITABLE STRUCTURE, WHETHER I LIVE THERE OR NOT. COUNCIL MEMBER MITCHELL OKAY. COUNCIL MEMBER ACTON YES, I'M JUST GOING TO CHIME IN. AND COUNCIL MEMBER BUTLER I HEAR YOU WHEN YOU SAY IT WOULD BE DERELICT FOR US NOT TO TRY TO FIND A COMPROMISE OR SOME WAY FOR THIS GENTLEMAN. BUT I ALSO WANT US TO BE VERY CLEAR THAT WE'RE TALKING APPLES AND ORANGE. MISTER LOGAN IS NOT ASKING FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. THE STRUCTURE IS THERE. THE CITY OF EAST POINT ALLOWS HABITABLE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. HE IS ASKING FOR A REZONING. I ALSO THINK THAT IT WOULD BE DERELICT FOR THOSE WHO LIVE AROUND HIM. TO PURCHASE A HOME IN AN R1 DISTRICT, AND THEN LATER THE CITY COMES AND REZONES THAT TO R3. THEY PURCHASED A HOME WHERE THEY WERE GOING TO BE OTHER SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AROUND THAT. SO WE HAVE TO LOOK AT BOTH OF THOSE THINGS. THIS PROPERTY CAN BECOME COMPLIANT IF MR. LOGAN CHOOSES TO LIVE IN THE PROPERTY, SO THAT THAT STRUCTURE BECOMES AN ACCESSORY TO THE PRIMARY AND THE CITY ISSUES HIM. A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THAT, THEN IT IS COMPLIANT, THEN IT REMAINS R1 AND THE NEIGHBORS WHO LIVE AROUND HIM WHO PURCHASE A HOME IN AN R1 DISTRICT, DO NOT HAVE TO FEAR OR WORRY ABOUT A MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURE BEING BUILT WITHIN THE MIDDLE OF THEIR COMMUNITY. I THINK IT IS ALSO WORTHY TO NOTE THAT IF YOU LOOK BACK AT THE MAP, I BELIEVE THAT THE LOT IS LARGER THAN THE OTHER LOTS IN THE COMMUNITY. IT IS EITHER A DOUBLE LOT OR A LOT AND A HALF. SO ONCE YOU REZONE THIS TO A R3, THEN YOU'RE ALLOWING MORE UNITS TO BE BUILT ON THAT LOT THAN WHAT'S AROUND THERE IN THE R1 DISTRICT. SO THE PROPERTY CAN BECOME COMPLIANT. YOU'RE CORRECT. WE ALLOW ADUS IN THE CITY OF EAST POINT ALL THE TIME, BUT WE DON'T CHANGE THE ZONING, WE DON'T CHANGE THE ZONING FOR THAT. WE GIVE THE APPLICANT A USE PERMIT FOR THOSE THINGS. WHERE YOU OFFER THIS OPTION, I'M SORRY. YES, HE WAS. SO I THINK AT THIS POINT IT WILL HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ON MONDAY. NO, WE MR. WE'VE ALREADY HAD THE PUBLIC HEARING. OH THAT'S RIGHT. WE ALREADY HAD THE PUBLIC HEARING COUNCIL WILL MAKE. THANK YOU.

    [00:55:03]

    COUNCILMAN. BUTLER COUNCIL WILL DECIDE ON THIS DAY. MR. LOGAN, YOU HAVE OPTIONS. AND YOU MENTIONED THAT YOUR SON WAS TRYING TO BUY THE PROPERTY. IF HE DOES, THEN HE LIVES IN IT.

    AND HE COULD DO A ADU A HABITABLE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IF YOU CHOSE TO LIVE IN IT AND SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. I'M ASSUMING THAT THE BACK HOUSE OR THE BACK UNIT YOU'RE SAYING IS UPSTAIRS, SO IT'S ASSUMING IT'S LESS THAN 50%, 50% OR LESS THAN THE FRONT STRUCTURE, WHICH MEANS IT WOULD COMPLY. BUT THOSE ARE YOUR OPTIONS, RIGHT? LIKE THOSE.

    THAT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT WE CAN DO FOR YOU OKAY. OUR CURRENT ORDINANCE DOESN'T ALLOW NON OWNERS TO GET A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A HABITABLE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE. IT DOES ALLOW OWNERS A R3. WHILE IT'S NOT YOUR INTENTION TO PUT APARTMENTS THERE, IF WE ZONE IT AS R3 AND YOU SELL IT TO SOMEBODY THEY COULD. SO THE RESIDENTS WHO LIVE AROUND THIS WOULD ALWAYS BE CONCERNED ABOUT A PART, AN APARTMENT COMPLEX BEING DROPPED IN THE MIDDLE OF A R1 SINGLE FAMILY ZONING DISTRICT, AND WHEN YOU PURCHASED IT, IT WAS R1, A SINGLE FAMILY ZONING. AND SO AT THIS POINT, WE DON'T WE WON'T HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING. SO, MADAM DEPUTY CITY CLERK, IF YOU COULD JUST PLACE THIS ON THE AGENDA AND HAVE THE PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED, DELETE IT AND ALSO INDICATE ON THE AGENDA THAT THE IN THE PARENTHESES, INSTEAD OF SAYING A PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON THE DATE THAT WE HELD IT IN NOVEMBER, I'M NOT. I CAN'T REMEMBER THE EXACT DATE AND THEN COUNCIL WOULD HAVE AN OPTION TO MAKE A DECISION ON MONDAY, BUT THERE ARE OPTIONS HERE. UNFORTUNATELY, THEY DON'T BELONG TO THE CITY. THEY BELONG TO THE OWNER. NO, I SAID, THERE ARE OPTIONS, BUT I THINK THE BALL IS IN YOUR COURT. YOU CAN TALK WITH STAFF. Y'ALL CAN WORK, WORK THROUGH IT WHETHER OR NOT IT'S WITHDRAWN AND RESUBMITTED IS SOMETHING DIFFERENT BECAUSE THE OWNERSHIP CHANGES. I DON'T KNOW WHEN YOUR SON IS PLANNING TO PURCHASE IT, BUT UNFORTUNATELY, EVEN YOUR INTENT IS NOT WHAT YOU'RE ASKING FOR. YOUR INTENT. IF WE BELIEVE WHAT YOU SAY TO BE TRUE IS TO HAVE YOUR SON OWN AND ONE, AND THEN USE THE ACCESSIBLE STRUCTURE IN THE BACK, WHICH IS WHAT WE ALLO. SO. BUT COUNCIL WILL MAKE THOSE DECISIONS ON MONDAY. THANK YOU.

    [III.3. Update on Policing]

    SO NO ONE ELSE ON ANY OF THE OTHER ITEMS BEFORE I START GOING IN ORDER, DO WE HAVE SOMEONE HERE FROM POLICE FOR AN UPDATE ON POLICING? YES, MA'AM. OKAY. MAJOR COPELAND IS HERE. SO GOOD EVENING, MADAM MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS ON MAJOR COPELAND. I ONLY GOT A COUPLE OF ITEMS THAT THE CHIEF GAVE ME TO UPDATE ON POLICING FOR THE HOLIDAYS, STARTING WITH CAMP CREEK. AT THE MARKETPLACE. WE HAVE ASSIGNED EXTRA UNIFORM OFFICERS AND PLAINCLOTHES POLICE OFFICERS TO WORK THE MARKETPLACE. FROM OPENING TO MIDNIGHT AND TO HANDLE ANY INCIDENTS IN THE MARKETPLACE. UNFORTUNATELY, ATLANTA AND FULTON COUNTY CID COULD NOT ASSIST US THIS YEAR.

    SO IT'S JUST HE'S PULLING OUT THERE AND WE'LL BE RUNNING THE DETAIL UP UNTIL JANUARY THE 10TH. AND THAT'S JUST FOR THE MARKETPLACE. ALSO IN REFERENCE TO THE SCHOOL ZONE CAMERAS, WE HAVE, THEY'VE GONE LIVE ALREADY. THEY IN A 30 DAY TEST MODE IN THE MIDDLE OF JANUARY WHEN SCHOOL STARTS, WE WILL ACTUALLY START WRITING TICKETS. WE HAVE HAD ADVERTISED ON SOCIAL MEDIA AND OTHER NEWS OUTLETS ARE GOING TO REPORT ON IT, SO THE CITIZENS CAN BE AWARE OF IT. AND I'M GONNA GIVE YOU THE LOCATIONS, THE THREE SCHOOLS. THERE'S GOING TO BE US MIDDLE SCHOOL ON HEADLAND DRIVE, WOODLAND MIDDLE SCHOOL ON STONE ROAD AND HAMILTON HOMES ON CONNOLLY DRIV.

    THAT'S ALL I HAVE. POLICE UPDATE THANK YOU. STILL, CAPTAIN MAJOR. MAJOR, I'M STILL TRYING TO LEARN THE SYMBOLS, BUT I. I KNEW YOU HAD A PROMOTION, RIGHT? YES, MA'AM. COUNCIL MEMBER ZIEGLER.

    YES. THANK YOU. SO I WHEN YOU WERE NAMING OFF THE SCHOOLS THERE, I DIDN'T HEAR TRI-CITIES.

    IS THERE A PARTICULAR REASON WHY THAT SCHOOL DIDN'T GET ANYTHING? I'M NOT SURE. I THINK IT'S IT DEPENDS ON WHAT WE REQUESTED. AND WE ONLY GOT THE THREE CAMERAS AND TRI CITY WASN'T ONE OF THEM. OKAY. DO YOU KNOW IF THERE'S ANY PLANS TO PUT ONE AT TRI-CITIES? I CAN FIND OUT. I'M NOT SURE. I CAN CHECK WITH THE CHIEF OF POLICE, BUT NO, I'M NOT FAMILIAR. OKAY. THANK YOU. YES, MA'AM. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MAJOR COPELAND? THANK YOU SO MUCH. I HAVE ONE, THANK YOU.

    THANK YOU. IN THIS PROBABLY A QUESTION FOR THE POLICE CHIEF. WHEN YOU ALL DECIDED TO PUT THE

    [01:00:07]

    CAMERAS AT THE SCHOOL, IT WAS BECAUSE OF THE CONSTANT TRAFFIC OR SPEEDING AND THE SPEEDING THAT GOES INTO SCHOOL ZONE. AND ONE HAMILTON HOMES, BEING A ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WITHOUT SIDEWALKS ALL THE WAY TO THE SCHOOL. AND YOU SAID WOODLAND MIDDLE SCHOOL. YES, MA'AM.

    WOODLAND MIDDLE SCHOOL, WHICH IS SPEEDING. AND THE OTHER ONE WAS WAS PARTY WEST PARK. YEAH.

    AGAIN, ANOTHER ROAD WHERE THERE'S CONSTANTLY SPEEDING DOWN HETLAND DOWN CONNELLY AND DOWN STONE. STONE. YES, MA'AM. WHERE THOSE SCHOOLS ARE. THANK YOU. OKAY. COUNCIL MEMBER BUTLER.

    YES, THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. ALSO, THERE ARE REQUIREMENTS BY THE STATE IN TERMS OF HOW WE PUT THOSE CAMERAS UP IN TERMS OF DISTANCING AND COULD YOU TELL US WHAT SOME OF THOSE OTHER REQUIREMENTS ARE TOO? WELL, I DON'T THINK I KNOW ABOUT THEM. IS THAT, YOU KNOW, THE SPEED LIMIT IS 25 MILES AN HOUR. AND WE, WE GOT A CHOICE TO HAVE THE CAMERAS ON JUST DURING THE MORNING HOURS AND THEN THE EVENING HOURS OR THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE DAY AND THROUGH THOSE THREE LOCATIONS. THE SPEED IS 25 MILES AN HOUR, REGARDLESS OF WHAT, WHETHER SCHOOLS IN OR OUT.

    AND SO WHAT WE ELECTED TO DO IS TO KEEP IT ON FOR THE WHOLE EIGHT HOURS. DO YOU HAVE ARE YOU GOING TO GIVE RESIDENTS NOTICE BEFORE YOU START? WE ACTUALLY WE ADVERTISED ON SOCIAL MEDIA AND PLUS THE NEWS IS GOING TO DO A REPORT ON IT. ALSO, HOW LONG IS THE WARNING PERIOD? 30 DAYS. SO IF SOMEONE VIOLATES THAT WITHIN THE 30 DAYS THEN YOU'LL GIVE THEM A WARNING A WARNING. BUT STARTING MID JANUARY THEY ACTUALLY GET TICKETS. AND THAT'S WHEN SCHOOL STARTS BACK. I'M GOING TO ASK THAT THE POLICE CHIEF CONSIDER GIVING TICKETS JUST TWICE A DAY, AS OPPOSED TO THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF TIME. WE'VE HAD SOME EASTPOINTE RESIDENTS THAT HAVE HAD ISSUES WITH THE SPEED CAMERA NEAR GOING TO GREENBRIAR, AND THEY DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT. YES. SO FOR HIS CONSIDERATION, MAYBE HE WANT TO THINK ABOUT THAT BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT TO BE INUNDATED.

    BECAUSE TO YOUR POINT, WHEN THE STATE MADE THAT LAW, EXCUSE ME, THERE ARE SOME REQUIREMENTS IN TERMS OF I'M NOT SURE IF THE TRI-CITY AREA, IT HAS A LONG ENOUGH STRAIGHTAWAY TO MAKE THAT, BUT I'M NOT SURE. BUT ASK HIM IF HE WOULD CONSIDER THAT FOR US. YEAH, AND ANOTHER REASON WE ELECTED TO DO IT. THE WHOLE DAY, BECAUSE THROUGHOUT SCHOOL, KIDS ARE STILL GETTING RELEASED EARLY. YOU KNOW, IT DEPENDS ON IF THEY GOT KIND OF DOCTOR'S APPOINTMENTS OR WHATEVER. SO WE STILL WANT TO KEEP THEM SAFE. ALSO, WHEN THE PEOPLE COME BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO COME, WE WANT THEM TO. YEAH, YEAH, I THINK A COUPLE OF THINGS. THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE. AND I THINK OPERATIONALLY I WOULD TRUST THE CHIEF AND HIS LEADERSHIP UNDER THIS INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO MAKE THE OPERATIONAL DECISION. BUT I THINK IT'S ALSO COUCHED IN SAFETY AND THE THIS ISN'T THE FIRST TIME THAT YOU ALL HAVE SHARED WITH US THE SPEED CAMERA, LOCATIONS THAT YOU ALL ARE CONSIDERING AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE. AND SO NOW THAT IT'S ROLLING OUT, YOU KNOW, SHARING HOW THOSE THE LOCATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN FINALIZED HAVE BEEN DETERMINED, I DON'T THINK AND HE'S GIVEN AN UPDATE THIS YEAR ABOUT THE CAMERAS, ABOUT WHERE THEY'RE BEING CONSIDERED. AND SO IF MAYBE MISS JESSE COULD EMAIL INFORMATION AGAIN ABOUT HOW THOSE AREAS WERE SELECTED, I KNOW THERE ARE A LOT OF CONCERNS AROUND SPEEDING IN THE JEFFERSON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD AREA. YES, AND SO ONE, I WAS THINKING THEY WERE THE CAMERAS ON BUSSES, BUT THESE AREN'T THE CAMERAS ON SCHOOL BUSSES RIGHT THERE IN THAT AREA. THEY ACTUALLY MOUNTED CAMERAS. THEY'RE ACTUALLY MOUNTED IN THE AREA. AND SO IF CHIEF COULD REMIND US AS TO HOW THOSE SELECTIONS WERE MADE AND IF THERE'S PLANS FOR EXPANSION AND YOU KNOW, I THINK THERE ALSO WAS A YOUNG LADY WHO WAS HIT ON THE CONNLEY HILLS GOING TO HAMILTON HOLMES. YES, MA'AM. AROUND THE TIME THAT WE EITHER STARTED THIS OR ALREADY TALKING ABOUT IT. SO MAYBE IF THAT CAN BE SHARED. YOU SAID THAT ENFORCEMENT STARTS IN THE MIDDLE OF JANUARY WHEN SCHOOL STARTS BACK. YES, MA'AM. AND OUR WORK SESSION IN JANUARY IS ON JANUARY 13TH. SO THAT'LL BE A LITTLE BIT BEFORE. BUT EITHER, MISS JESSE, IF WE COULD GET THE OUR RECOLLECTION REFLECTED ABOUT HOW THOSE DECISIONS WERE MADE AND THEN GET

    [01:05:05]

    ANY INFORMATION ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT THEY'RE THINKING OF EXPANDING TO DIFFERENT AREAS, THAT WOULD BE HELPFUL. AND IF NOT BEFORE JANUARY 13TH WORK SESSION. YES, MA'AM. WE'LL DEFINITELY FOLLOW UP WITH YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MAJOR COPELAND? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU

    [III.8. Distance Requirements for Public Notification of Planning and Zoning]

    SO MUCH. THANK YOU MA'AM. NUMBER EIGHT, DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF PLANNING AND ZONING. COUNCIL MEMBER MARTIN ROGERS, THANK YOU. AND I PUT THIS ITEM ON THE AGENDA BECAUSE IT WAS BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION BY RESIDENTS NOT ONLY IN MY COMMUNITY. THAT JUST NOTIFICATION OF THINGS THAT ARE COMING TO THE COMMUNITY, THE DISTANCE REQUIREMENT IS RATHER SHORT FOR INSTANCE, I THINK THE LAST EXAMPLE I GAVE WAS THE MICROSOFT DEVELOPMENT, IN WHICH THE HOMES THAT WERE NOTIFIED WERE IMMEDIATELY RIGHT THERE. HOWEVER, THE MICROSOFT DEVELOPMENT IMPACTED THREE OTHER COMMUNITIES IN THE AREA. SO I JUST WANTED TO KNOW IF THERE WAS SOMETHING THAT STAFF COULD DO TO BETTER NOTIFY OR EXTEND THE NOTIFICATION WHEN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS ARE COMING TO A AREA THAT ARE GOING TO IMPACT THE HOMEOWNERS THAT LIVE THERE.

    THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF COUNCIL KIMBERLY SMITH WILL COME UP AND DISCUSS THE DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IN REFERENCE TO THIS ITEM, IN REFERENCE TO THE WAREHOUSE AND I-1 ZONE PROPERTIES AND THE DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS. STAFF IS CURRENTLY WORKING ON A DRAFT ORDINANCE THAT WE'RE GOING TO VET THROUGH THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT. ONCE WE HAVE VETTED IT THROUGH THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT, WE'RE GOING TO TAKE IT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THEIR RECOMMENDATION TO COME BEFORE THIS BODY TO ACCOMMODATE YOU EARLY NEXT YEAR. THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU. I ALMOST FEEL LIKE WE'VE HAD THIS CONVERSATION BEFORE AND IT PROBABLY WAS BEFORE YOU CAME TO THE CITY.

    THIS CONVERSATION WE HAD OVER AT THE JEFFERSON STATION BUILDING ABOUT THE DISTANCE REQUIREMENT.

    AND I KNOW IT USED TO BE ONE DISTANCE, AND I THINK IT WENT TO MAYBE 500FT, MAYBE A THOUSAND FEET OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. AND, AND I FEEL LIKE WE'RE STILL HAVING THE SAME CONVERSATION AND I, I, I'M ALMOST SURE YOU WASN'T HERE AT THE TIME WE HAD THAT CONVERSATION, BUT I CAN SEE WHERE THERE'S A PROBLEM. AND IT SHOULDN'T JUST BE FOR WAREHOUSE. IT SHOULD BE FOR ANYTIME. THEY HAVE TO NOTIFY WHEN A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD IS BEING IMPACTED BY WHATEVER DEVELOPMENT. BECAUSE WHAT AFFECTS UP AT A CORNER AFFECTS EVERYBODY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

    SO IF WE COULD JUST LOOK AT THAT AS A WHOLE AS OPPOSED TO JUST WAREHOUSES AND ALSO AND I THOUGHT THAT THE MOVIE THING WOULD BE ON HERE. BUT THAT'S NOT THAT'S NOT YOUR AREA. THAT WOULD BE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. BUT YEAH, IF WE COULD JUST TAKE A LOOK AT INCREASING IT AS A WHOL, WE WILL. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER SHROPSHIRE. YOU'RE RIGHT. WE INCREASED IT WHEN I WAS A COUNCIL MEMBER. IT WENT. I THINK IT WENT FROM 500 TO 1000. THERE WAS AN INCREASE AND IT WAS TIED TO REZONING, NOT JUST INDUSTRIAL. I THINK YOU KNOW, THERE IS A BALANCING ACT OF. ARE WE GETTING INTO MORE? WE WANT TO DEFINITELY NOTIFY THE RESIDENTS. RIGHT. WE WANT TO NOTIFY AS MANY OF THEM AS POSSIBLE. BUT HOW WIDE IS HOW WHAT'S WHAT'S LARGE ENOUGH? RIGHT. AND THE ISSUES HAVE COME UP AROUND INDUSTRIAL OR REZONING FOR INDUSTRIAL. BUT I THINK WHAT WE DID WHEN IT WAS INCREASED BEFORE, MADAM, MISS SMITH, YOU WEREN'T HERE AT THE TIME, BUT YOU MAY HAVE LOOKED AT IT FROM A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE. I THINK IT WAS TIED TO JUST REZONINGS AND NOT NECESSARILY INDUSTRIAL. I COULD BE WRONG, BUT I MEAN, IF WE THE CONCERN IS, IS DEFINITELY WHEN THERE'S RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS WITHIN THE AREA. AND SO WHEN WE INCREASED IT BEFORE IT WAS BECAUSE OF PROPERTY THAT PROBABLY NOW IS OWNED BY MICROSOFT, WHERE THAT ISSUE CAME UP BECAUSE THE PROPERTY WAS PREVIOUSLY RESIDENTIAL, IT WAS FIRST INDUSTRIAL, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, THEN IT WENT TO RESIDENTIAL. AND THEN WHEN THEY WERE REZONING IT

    [01:10:01]

    FROM WANTING TO REZONE FROM RESIDENTIAL BACK TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. AFTER THE 2008 HOUSING MARKET CRASH. THAT'S WHEN THERE WAS A LOT OF CONCERN AND THEY WANTED THE REZONING BACK TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL BECAUSE THEY WERE NO LONGER ABLE TO BUILD RESIDENTIAL BECAUSE OF THE MARKET HOUSING MARKET AT THAT TIME. AND SO THAT'S WHEN IT WAS INCREASED. BUT THEN WE ENDED UP WITH ANOTHER REZONING OF PROPERTIES AFTER MCDONOUGH OF MICROSOFT PURCHASED ADDITIONAL PROPERTIES IN THE AREA AND THE NOTIFICATION FOR THOSE. RIGHT, SO WE CAN LOOK AT REZONING AS A WHOLE. I DON'T KNOW WHAT IMPACT THAT WOULD BE. THE COUNCIL MEMBER SHROPSHIRE ALWAYS POINT LIKE THAT WOULD BE EASIER. NOT JUST SELECTING A USE OR IS WHAT TYPES OF USES SHOULD WE BE LOOKING AT? WHAT ARE THE ONES THAT REALLY NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF OUR RESIDENTS? WHEN WE START GOING FROM SOMETHING TO SOMETHING, RIGHT, LIKE AND GENERALLY THAT'S GOING FROM A RESIDENTIAL TO AN INDUSTRIAL LIKE, THOSE TYPES OF USES ARE JUST NOT EVEN COMPATIBLE. BUT WE DID CREATE TWO NEW ZONING DISTRICTS. WAS IT WAREHOUSE, INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE, WAREHOUSE, MIXED USE INDUSTRIAL, MIXED USE COMMERCIAL RIGHT. THANK YOU. YES. AND I THINK THE INTENT IS TO ACTUALLY CAPTURE THE COMMUNITIES THAT ARE SURROUNDING. AND SO IF YOU HAVE MOST OF THE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES ARE LARGE IN SIZE. AND SO WHEN YOU PUT $1,000 RADIUS AROUND, IT DOESN'T CAPTURE THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, SPECIFICALLY RESIDENTIAL IF THEY'RE IN THE AREA. YEAH. SO COUNCIL MEMBER ATKINS. YES. IN ADDITION TO THE DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS THAT MADAM MAYOR SPOKE OF, OF HOW WE INCREASE THAT THE CITY ALSO HAD NOT HAD A MANDATORY COMMUNITY MEETING. AND SO WE INSTITUTED THE CCIM. AND SO I THINK THAT ONE OF THE WAYS, AS DIRECTOR SMITH HAS MENTIONED, THE INTENT IS TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE INFORMING THE PUBLIC OF WHAT'S COMING AS IT RELATES TO ZONING AND PLANNING MATTERS. AND SO, MISS SMITH, I KNOW THAT YOUR OFFICE PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THAT YOU GUYS ARE CHARGED WITH KEEPING A RECORD OF ALL OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION MEETINGS, THEIR PRESIDENTS AND I BELIEVE THAT THAT IS NOT UP TO DATE. SO IF WE CAN MAKE THAT UP TO DATE SO THAT WHEN THERE ARE ZONING MATTERS THAT COME TO CERTAIN COMMUNITIES, WE'VE GOT GOOD INFORMATION TO REACH OUT TO THE RESIDENTS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION MEETINGS SO THEY CAN ATTEND THE CCIM AND GET THE INFORMATION ON ANY OF THE MATTERS THAT ARE IMPACTING THEIR COMMUNITY AS IT RELATES TO PLANNING AND ZONING. THANK YOU. COUNCILMEMBER SHROPSHIRE, THANK YOU. AND IT SHOULDN'T JUST BE ABOUT NOTIFYING THE RESIDENTS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, BECAUSE MOST NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS ARE NOT AS ACTIVE AS OTHERS, BUT IT SHOULD BE A PROCESS AND A PLAN TO NOTIFY THE RESIDENTS AS WELL, BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO BE IMPACTED BY WHAT COMES IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD. YES, I WASN'T ASKING FOR SUBSTITUTE. I WAS ASKING TO BE. IN ADDITION, HOLD ON, HOLD ON. BUT I WAS JUST HOLD ON, HOLD ON, HOLD ON, HOLD ON, HOLD ON, HOLD ON. SO WE DON'T GO BACK AND FORTH WITH THE QUESTION AND ANSWER. LIKE IF COUNCIL MEMBER ATKINS, IF YOU WANT TO COME IN AGAIN, JUST PRESS YOUR BUTTON AND I'LL HAVE YOU TALK AFTER COUNCIL MEMBER SHROPSHIRE. BUT LET'S TRY TO STICK TO OUR ONE PERSON SPEAKS AND THEN I'LL CALL THE NEXT PERSON. BUT THE CONVERSATION IS KIND OF WHERE WE GET INTO A LITTLE BIT OF BACK AND FORTH. SO COUNCIL MEMBER SHROPSHIRE, ARE YOU DONE? FOR NOW, COUNCILMEMBER ATKINS YES, I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY. I WASN'T ASKING FOR THE DISTANCE REQUIREMENT AND THOSE NOTIFICATIONS TO GO AWAY IN ORDER TO REACH AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE. I WAS ASKING THAT WE ALSO INCLUDE NOTIFYING THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. SO THEN WE HAVE ANOTHER LAYER OF NOTIFICATION SO THAT WE CAN TRY TO GET AS MANY CITIZENS AS INVOLVED, INFORMED. COUNCIL MEMBER SHROPSHIRE. AND THANK YOU FOR THAT. AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS ARE ALREADY NOTIFIED. AND WHAT I WAS SAYING IS IT SHOULDN'T BE JUST ABOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS, BECAUSE THERE ARE SOME THAT ARE NOT AS ACTIVE AS OTHERS. SO WHAT WE WANT TO DO IS MAKE SURE WE CAPTURE EVERYBODY THAT'S IMPACTED BY WHATEVER DEVELOPMENT IS COMING THAT AFFECTS THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD. I THINK THAT THE COMMUNITY ZONE INFORMATION MEETINGS, I'M NOT SURE WHEN THEY STARTED. THEY'VE BEEN A WHILE FOR AROUND FOR A WHILE, BUT THE CHALLENGE HAS BEEN WHEN THE RADIUS IS NOT LARGE ENOUGH, WHEN WE DON'T NOTIFY ENOUGH RESIDENTS IN THE AREA TO THE POINT OF NOTIFYING THE PRESIDENTS OF THE HOA AS AN ADDITIONAL LAYER AND THE OTHER LAYER THAT STAFF HAS STARTED DOING WAS ALSO NOTIFYING MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS OF WHEN THOSE THOSE CARS THAT GO OUT THAT WE GET A CARD AS WELL, SO THAT WE WILL KNOW ABOUT IT SO THAT WE COULD TRY TO GET THE INFORMATION OUT. BUT SO THE MULTI-LAYERED COMMUNICATION APPROACH I THINK IS HELPFUL. THE

    [01:15:05]

    CHALLENGE HAS BEEN THAT ALTHOUGH WE HAVE A COMMUNITY ZONE INFORMATION MEETING, ALTHOUGH WE HAVE THE PLANNING ZONING WORK SESSION AND THEN WE HAVE THE PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING, AND THEN IT COMES TO COUNCIL WORK SESSION AND THEN IT COMES TO COUNCIL MEETING WHEN THE DISTANCE ISN'T LARGE ENOUGH, PEOPLE AREN'T RECEIVING THE INFORMATION. AND WE'VE HAD SEIZED ON VERY, I GUESS, CONTROVERSIAL TYPE PROJECTS WHERE NOBODY SHOWED UP BECAUSE AND THEN THEY SAID THEY DIDN'T GET THE INFORMATION. THE, THE THING THAT I WOULD LIKE FOR US TO LOOK AT IS WE RELY ON WHAT DO YOU CALL IT, SELF-REPORTING OR GOODWILL. WHEN THESE PEOPLE TELL US THAT THEY'RE PROVIDING THESE NOTIFICATIONS, BUT WE'RE NOT GETTING ANYTHING TO CONFIRM THAT THEY ACTUALLY WERE SENT. RIGHT. SO WE HAD THEY WE GIVE THEM A LIST OR THEY GET A LIST AND THEY SAY THEY SENT THEM, BUT WE HAVE NOTHING IN OUR PROCESS. AND CITY ATTORNEY WIGGINS, I DON'T KNOW IF OTHER CITIES HAVE IT. WE THERE'S IT'S KIND OF LIKE WE THEY SAY THEY DID IT. WE SAY WE GAVE THEM THE INFORMATION. THEY SAY THEY DID IT. AND WE DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO CONFIRM. LIKE THEY'RE NOT SENDING IF WE'RE ON THE LIST THEN WE'LL GET IT. BUT THERE'S NO CHECK AND BALANCE A LOT OF TIMES. AND WE'VE HAD SITUATIONS WHERE DEVELOPERS SAY THEY DID AND RESIDENTS SAY THEY DIDN'T. AND OUR LAWS, OUR ORDINANCE JUST REQUIRES THEM TO DO IT. IS THERE A WAY TO PUT A CHECK AND BALANCE IN TO CONFIRM IN SOME WAY THAT THEY SENT IT TO THE WHATEVER OUR RADIUS IS, RIGHT? LIKE THAT. THERE'S I'M SAYING PROOF, BUT YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? LIKE SOMETHING TO THAT WE'D BE ABLE TO SAY, OKAY, YES, THESE WENT OUT. SO YOU'RE RIGHT. ONE THING THAT CAN HAPPEN IS THAT WE CAN CHANGE OUR FEE SCHEDULE TO INCLUDE US SENDING IT OUT ON THEIR BEHALF. THE OTHER THING IS, LIKE WITH POSTING, BECAUSE OUR WE CAN VERIFY POSTING OF THE PROPERTY, RIGHT? BECAUSE THERE MUST BE POSTING ON ALL STREETS THAT FRONT, WHATEVER PROPERTY IS GETTING THE ACTION, THE ENTITLEMENT. AND I KNOW THE DEPARTMENT HAS STARTED GOING OUT TO TAKE PICTURES TO ENSURE THAT THAT'S BEING DONE. WE HAD A CASE WHERE IT WAS QUESTIONABLE WHETHER IT WAS DONE, AND THAT POSTING IS USUALLY DONE BY THE APPLICANT, AND WE HAD TO KIND OF PIVOT SO THAT WE CAN MAKE SURE THAT THE POSTING OCCURRED. AND SO WHEN THAT DID HAPPEN, PLANNING AND ZONING WAS LIKE, OKAY, WE NEED TO BE CHECKING THIS STUFF REGULARLY TO ENSURE THAT THE POSTING IS DONE. SO WE'VE GOT A FEW OPTIONS TO MEET THE VERIFICATION OF WHETHER OR NOT CITIZENS ARE GETTING THE NOTIFICATION. AND SO I THINK THIS OPERATIONAL AND LEGAL TO SOME EXTENT, LIKE IF I THINK IF WE COULD TAKE ALL OF THE DISCUSSION THAT WE'RE HAVING TONIGHT AROUND THE DIFFERENT SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AS WELL AS SOME LEVEL OF VERIFICATION, I DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH STAFF TIME IT WOULD TAKE FOR US TO MAIL ALL OF THEM OUT.

    A LOT, RIGHT? AND I KNOW WE HAVE A NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT THAT HAVEN'T BEEN FILLED, AND DIFFERENT WAYS TO RESTRUCTURE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES. ACTUALLY, THE CHARTER ALLOWS COUNCIL TO DETERMINE THE FUNCTION AND DUTIES OF POSITIONS. RIGHT? SO BUT I THINK WE NEED TO ALL OF THIS I MEAN, I'M IN MY 11TH YEAR AND THE THINGS THAT HAVE COME UP AND HAVE BEEN CONTROVERSIAL HAVE BEEN THE DEVELOPER SAID I SENT IT, THE RESIDENTS SAID WE DIDN'T RECEIVE IT, WE HAD NO KNOWLEDGE. AND WE HAVE NOTHING TO SUPPORT IN ANY KIND OF WAY. WHETHER THEY DID WHAT THEY SAID THEY WERE GOING TO DO OR ANY OF THAT. SO AS WE'RE LOOKING AT IT HOLISTICALLY AROUND WHETHER OR NOT WE SHOULD INCREASE THE DISTANCE, WELL, WE SHOULD INCREASE THE DISTANCE TO WHAT IT SHOULD BE. YOU KNOW, HOW WE HAVE THE MULTI-LAYERS OF COMMUNICATION BUILT IN TO KIND OF ENSURE THAT. BUT IT IS REALLY THE DUTY IS ON THE DEVELOPER OR THE APPLICANT TO ACTUALLY MAKE THOSE NOTIFICATIONS HAPPEN. RIGHT. BUT WE HAVE TO HAVE SOME WAY TO CONFIRM, VERIFY, CONFIRM. MAY I, COUNCILMAN? YES. MAY I ADD SOMETHING? I WAS JUST GOING TO STATE, AS IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS, THEY OFTEN REQUIRE THE APPLICANT TO DO A CERTIFIED MAIL, WHICH IS IT WOULD BE AN ADDITIONAL FEE. AND IF THEY HAVE A LOT OF PEOPLE TO NOTIFY, THEN IT COULD GO UP IN COST, BECAUSE I THINK THE CARDS ARE ABOUT $7 PER CARD. SO THEY WOULD HAVE TO PAY $7 AND MAY HAVE GONE UP SINCE FIVE YEARS AGO. BUT MANY JURISDICTIONS

    [01:20:06]

    REQUIRE CERTIFIED MAIL. THE CERTIFIED GREEN CARDS TO GO OUT, SO THAT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO KNOW WHICH JURISDICTIONS ARE REQUIRING THAT BECAUSE THEY'RE PAYING IT SOMEWHERE. THEY'RE JUST NOT PAYING IN EASTPOINTE. RIGHT. AND SO MAYBE IF WE CAN FIGURE OUT WHAT JURISDICTIONS ARE REQUIRING THAT, AND IF THERE'S BEEN ANY FEEDBACK AROUND IT. BUT LIKE THE KEY IS TO MAKE SURE RESIDENTS ARE NOTIFIED ABOUT WHAT'S HAPPENING IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOODS, IN THEIR AREA, AND THAT THEY'RE AWARE OF THE OPPORTUNITIES TO PARTICIPATE AND PROVIDE IMPACT AND ENGAGE AND GET INFORMATION. THAT'S KIM WORK SESSION PLAN. THAT'S FIVE MEETINGS, AND WE END UP GETTING TO THE WORK SESSION WITH COUNCIL, WHERE THREE MEETINGS HAVE ALREADY BEEN HELD AND PEOPLE NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT WHAT'S HAPPENING. SO IF WE COULD FIND OUT WHICH JURISDICTIONS ARE REQUIRING CERTIFIED MAIL AND SEE HOW THAT'S GOING, ESPECIALLY IF WE'RE LOOKING AT THE CITIES IN FULTON COUNTY, THAT WOULD BE A GOOD PLACE TO START. OR SOUTH FULTON, ATLANTA COUNCILMEMBER MARTIN ROGERS. YES, AND I JUST WANTED TO SAY THAT EARLIER THIS YEAR, I EMAILED ATTORNEY WIGGINS AND MISS SMITH, AND YOU MADE MENTION OF AN ENTIRE ZONING REWRITE. IS THIS WOULD THIS BE A PART OF THAT? I KNOW THAT WE HAVEN'T HAD TIME TO TALK MUCH MORE ABOUT IT, BUT YOU DID MENTION THAT THE ITEM SHOULD GO ON THE WORK SESSION AND AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE NOW, BUT THIS WAS FOR ANOTHER ISSUE, AND THAT WILL GET US TO THE REVISION AS OPPOSED TO A PIECEMEAL APPROACH. BUT THIS IS FOR ANOTHER ISSUE. WOULD THIS BE A PART OF THAT CONVERSATION THAT WE HAD EARLIER? JUST A COMPLETE ZONING REWRITE, BECAUSE SOMEONE WAS HIRED IN THE PAST, BUT IT CERTAINLY COULD BE RIGHT. AS WE USE THE ZONING ORDINANCE MORE AND MORE, WE IDENTIFY ISSUES THAT NEED TO BE CHANGED, AMENDED, UPDATED VERSUS WITH IN ACCORDANCE WITH LIKE STATE LAW.

    SO IT COULD BE OR WE CAN TAKE THE APPROACH OF, YOU KNOW, AS WE SEE THINGS MAKE CHANGES AS WE SEE THEM. SO IT REALLY IS THE WILL OF THE COUNCIL. DO WE HAVE ANY UPDATES ON THE ZONING CODE REWRITE? THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS APPROVED. QUITE SOME TIME AGO. AND I THINK WE WERE TALKING ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT THE CITY ATTORNEY MIGHT BE ABLE TO. PROVIDE THAT FUNCTION INSTEAD OF GOING TO ANOTHER THIRD PARTY VENDOR. I THINK THAT WAS THE LAST TIME WE TALKED ABOUT IT, BECAUSE IT'S BEEN QUITE SOME TIME SINCE THE ZONING CODE REWRITE WAS APPROVED BY COUNCIL.

    I THINK THE LAST THING THAT HAPPENED, I GAVE YOU GUYS A MEMO ON THE STATUS OF WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE LAST VENDOR THAT WAS HIRED TO DO IT. THAT WAS NOT DONE. AND I SUBMITTED A PROPOSAL, BUT I DON'T THINK ANYTHING HAPPENED AFTER THAT. MAYBE THAT'S A PUBLIC DISCUSSION, RIGHT? YEAH. SO WE COULD PUT ZONING CODE, REWRITE ON THE JANUARY WORK SESSION.

    MADAM DEPUTY, CITY CLERK, WE THINK WE COULD. YOU ALREADY SENT THE MEMO, AND WE ALREADY HAVE THE INFORMATION, AND WE CAN MAKE SURE ALL OF COUNCIL HAVE IT AS WELL. JANUARY WORK SESSION, ZONING CODE REWRITE, UPDATE. ANYTHING ELSE? COUNCIL MEMBER MARTIN. SO THIS ITEM, MISS SMITH INDICATED THAT YOU ALL ARE WORKING ON A DRAFT ORDINANCE. COUNCIL MEMBER MARK ROGERS. THAT MEANS THEY COULD PUT IT ON WHEN IT'S READY OR OKAY, IT'S GOING TO COME BACK THROUGH FROM PLANNING COMMISSION BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO BE AN ORDINANCE. RIGHT. SO IT WILL COME BACK. SO BUT YOU ALL COULD START THE PROCESS AND CORRECT AT. MADAM CITY ATTORNEY, COULD COUNCIL SHOULD COUNCIL I COULD WE COULD SHOULD COUNCIL GET AN UPDATE ON WHAT IS BEING RECOMMENDED FROM STAFF REGARDING THE DISTANCE PRIOR TO IT GOING TO THE THROUGH THE PROCESS OR AS IT GOES THROUGH THE PROCESS FOR A ZONING TEXT REWRITE. SO YOU'RE SAYING PRIOR TO AN ENTIRE ZONING REWRITE, CAN YOU GET AN UPDATE? I'M SORRY, I MISSPOKE PRIOR TO THE ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT COMING BACK TO US, WHICH WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE PROCESS OF CCIM PUBLIC. YOU CAN GET AN UPDATE. YOU JUST CAN'T TAKE ACTION.

    OKAY, SO MAYBE WE CAN GET AN UPDATE AT THE JANUARY WORK SESSION SO WE CAN HAVE DISCUSSION AROUND WHAT DISTANCES WE'RE CONSIDERING AND THINGS LIKE THAT BEFORE IT ACTUALLY GOES THROUGH THE PROCESS. COULD YOU ASK WITH THE DISTANCE AND THE APPROACH TO YOUR POINT, TO MAKE SURE THAT WE KNOW THAT THE APPLICANT IS SENDING STUFF OUT TO LOOK AT BOTH OF THOSE, WHETHER IT'S GOING TO BE SIMPLY SEND THEM. OH YEAH, THE DISTANCE AND THE OTHER CITIES THAT ARE REQUIRING CERTIFIED MAIL FOR NOTIFICATION, LIKE HOW WE ENSURE VERIFICATION AND NOTIFICATION.

    [01:25:04]

    WERE YOU PLANNING TO START THE PROCESS WITH IN JANUARY WITH THE ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT? IT MIGHT DELAY IT FOR A MONTH IF IT COMES BACK TO US FIRST, AND IT CAN BE SIMULTANEOUS. MADAM MAYOR. SO AS SHE PREPARES IT FOR IT TO GO THROUGH THE STATUTORY PROCESS, IT CAN BE SIMULTANEOUS. IT CAN GO TO THE TO THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL JUST FOR DISCUSSION ONLY. AND SO IF AS TO NOT DELAY IT FOR ANOTHER 30 DAYS. SO THAT'S AN OPTION. WE'LL, WE'LL LET STAFF AND LEGAL DECIDE. I MEAN I THINK THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE PROBABLY SHOULD ADDRESS SOONER RATHER THAN LATER, BUT ADDRESSING ALL OF THE DISCUSSION THAT WE'VE HAD TONIGHT AS A PART OF THE ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT,

    [III.10. Local Food Ecosystem]

    OKAY. LOCAL FOOD ECOSYSTEM COUNCIL MEMBER FREELY INITIALLY PUT THIS ON, BUT THE LAST DISCUSSION WAS THAT THERE IS FUNDING IN THE BUDGET FOR A CITY AGRICULTURAL. I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S MANAGER, WHAT IT'S CALLED. AND THE QUESTION WAS WHETHER OR NOT IT WAS. THE FUNDING IS FOR A CONSULTANT OR FOR AN EMPLOYEE. AND THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER HAS GIVEN US THIS DOCUMENT. SO I'LL TURN IT OVER TO MISS JESSIE. MADAM MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, AFTER A COUPLE OF DISCUSSIONS REGARDING THE STAFFING CHOICES FOR THE TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY AGRICULTURE PLAN, YOU ASKED THAT STAFF GO BACK AND DO SOME RESEARCH AND COME BACK WITH A RECOMMENDATION ON WHAT IS MOST FEASIBLE AT THIS PARTICULAR TIME. AND IN DOING SOME RESEARCH ON THAT, I SPOKE WITH MEMBERS OF OUR INTERNAL STAFF WHO HAS SERVED AS A PARTNER OR STAFF TO THE LOCAL FOOD ECOSYSTEM COMMISSION. I SPOKE WITH MEMBERS OF THE LOCAL FOOD ECOSYSTEM COMMISSION AND SOME OF THEIR PARTNERS. AND WHAT I GAVE YOU IS REALLY A RECAP OF SOME OF THE HIGHLIGHTS OF THE CITY AGRICULTURE PLAN, WHAT THE PLAN INTENDS TO DO OR WHAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO DO, SOME OF THE WORK THAT THEY'VE ALREADY DONE, THEIR PRIORITIES, AND A WORK PLAN OR SOMEWHAT OF A ROADMAP FOR WHAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO ACHIEVE IN THE FUTURE. THE IDEA WAS FOR US TO AT LEAST GET THIS STARTED WITH SOME STAFF SUPPORT. AND SO WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT WAS HOW DO WE GET THIS EFFORT OFF THE GROUND, AND WHERE BEST WOULD THE POSITION REST? SO WE LOOKED AT THE DEPARTMENTS THAT WE HAVE, AND I KNOW THOSE ON COUNCIL WHO ARE FAMILIAR WITH SEVERAL OF THE PRESENTATIONS THAT THE LOCAL FOOD ECOSYSTEM COMMISSION DID HEARD FROM THEM, THAT THEY FELT LIKE THIS IS A MULTIFACETED APPROACH, THAT IT IMPACTS THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. IT IMPACTS IMPACTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SOMEWHAT, RECREATION, AND OF COURSE, OUR NEWEST ENDEAVOR WITH THE OFFICE OF EQUITY, INCLUSION AND EMPOWERMENT, BECAUSE THAT PROGRAM IS REALLY THE CLOSEST TO PEOPLE WHO COULD BENEFIT THE MOST TO HAVING LOCAL FOOD SOURCES. SO AS WE TALKED ABOUT THIS, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE THOUGHT TO GET THIS OFF THE GROUND, THIS IS WHY WE BUDGETED THE POSITION IN THE OFFICE OF EQUITY TO GIVE IT A HOME, SO TO SPEAK. THE ISSUE WITH THAT, AS I INDICATED IN THE INFORMATION, I GAVE YOU, IS THAT WE WERE EXPECTING THAT DEPARTMENT TO BE MORE FULLY STAFFED THAN WHAT IT IS RIGHT NOW. WE ONLY HAVE THREE PEOPLE IN THE OFFICE THAT IS HOUSING MANAGER. WE HAVE OUR COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES MANAGER AND A COMMUNITY LIAISON. WE ARE HOPING TO HIRE SOME ADDITIONAL STAFF. ONE OF THE REASONS, THE RECOMMENDATION THAT I'M MAKING TONIGHT IS THAT WE

    [01:30:02]

    NOT USE THIS AS A STAFF PERSON AT THIS PARTICULAR TIME, BECAUSE WE DO NOT HAVE THE SUPPORT, THE SUPPORTIVE SERVICES THAT WE WERE ENVISIONING SEVERAL MONTHS AGO. THERE'S NO ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT. MOST OF THE MANAGERS ARE DOING THEIR WORK. AND UNTIL WE GET THAT OFFICE FULLY CONSTITUTED, WE BELIEVE THAT A CONSULTANT WOULD WORK BEST FOR THE INTERIM TIME PERIOD. WHAT A CONSULTANT WILL DO IS TO TAKE THE VERY GOOD RECOMMENDATIONS THAT ARE FOUND IN THE IN THE LOCAL FOOD ECOSYSTEM WORK PLAN. IT'S A VERY THICK DOCUMENT. I'M NOT SURE IF IT'S STILL ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE OR NOT, BUT IT'S A VERY THOROUGH APPROACH TO PROVIDING FOOD SUSTAINABILITY AT THE LOCAL LEVEL, AND WE THINK THAT A CONSULTANT COULD COULD ALSO HELP US GET OUR ARMS AROUND IT TO FIGURE OUT HOW WE GO ABOUT IMPLEMENTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS. ALSO, THAT WE ARE ABLE TO GET GRANT FUNDS. WE HAVE A GRANTS MANAGER POSITION AVAILABLE, BUT IT IS NOT FILLED YET. WE'RE RECRUITING FOR THAT POSITION, BUT IT'S BEEN DIFFICULT ATTRACTING AN INDIVIDUAL AT THIS PARTICULAR TIME TO COME ON FULL TIME. SO TO MAKE THE LONG AND SHORT OF IT, WE BELIEVE THAT IF WE COULD START OUT WITH A CONSULTANT, BUILD UPON THE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THAT CONSULTANT, ULTIMATELY THIS COULD BE A CITY POSITION AND IT COULD BE IN MAYBE THE OFFICE OF EQUITY, OR IT COULD BE IN ANOTHER DEPARTMENT. IT JUST DEPENDS. BUT SO WE DON'T HAVE TO WAIT ANY ADDITIONAL LENGTH OF TIME, WE COULD START THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS FOR A CONSULTANT AND HAVE SOMEONE POSSIBLY ON BOARD BY FEBRUARY. THANK YOU. SO MUCH FOR THAT.

    OVERVIEW AND UPDATE. MISS JESSIE. SO WHAT WOULD THE BUDGET IS 75,000. WHAT WOULD THE WHAT AMOUNT. AND THAT WAS FOR THE FULL FISCAL YEAR. SO ARE YOU ALL THINKING HALF OF THAT 37 FIVE.

    ACTUALLY I'M THINKING THAT IF WE PROCURED THIS SERVICE THAT WE DON'T KNOW WHAT IT'LL COME BACK AT IN TERMS OF THE COST, BUT I'M EXPECTING THAT AN INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD BE DOING THIS INDEPENDENTLY WOULD PROBABLY ASK FOR A LITTLE BIT MORE THAN THAT, BECAUSE THEY WOULD HAVE TO PROVIDE EVERYTHING. BASICALLY, THEY WOULD NOT HAVE THE OFFICE SPACE THAT WE WOULD HAVE AT THE CITY AND OTHER AMENITIES. IT COULD COST MORE THAN THAT, MORE THAN WHAT WE BUDGETED JUST FOR THE PERSON OR A BODY. BUT WE COULD PUT IT OUT AND SEE WHAT WE'RE ABLE TO GET BACK IN IN TERMS OF DOLLARS. YEAH, I JUST THINK THAT WE HAVE TO THINK ABOUT THE FACT THAT WE'RE HALFWAY THROUGH THE FISCAL YEAR, AND WHAT WAS BUDGETED WAS BUDGETED FOR 12 MONTHS, NOT JUST SIX. AND SO THAT WOULD BE A STEEP SIX MONTH CONTRACT AT $75,000 FOR SIX MONTHS. BUT COUNCIL MEMBER, COUNCIL MEMBER MITCHELL THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION.

    AND THAT WAS ONE OF THE QUESTIONS THAT THE MAYOR TALKED ABOUT WITH THE SALARY OF THE 75,000. BUT LIKE YOU SAID, WE DON'T KNOW WHAT A CONSULTANT, WHAT THEY WOULD ASK FOR. AND THEN LIKE SHE SAID, IT'S IN THE MIDDLE OF THAT FISCAL BUDGET YEAR. SO AND YOU YOU MENTIONED SOMETHING ABOUT THE, THE OFFICE SPACE. SO THEY WOULD OPERATE INDEPENDENTLY. THEY WOULDN'T HAVE A PROVIDED SPACE HERE AT THE. CORRECT. OKAY. AND I KNOW A BIG THING, I WAS LOOKING AT THE PROS AND THE CONS THAT YOU HAD HERE. YOU TALKED ABOUT WITH THE GRANT WRITING. SO WHEN I LOOKED AT THE CONS FOR IF WE SECURE THE SERVICES OF A CONSULTANT, COULD WE NOT PUT THAT IN THERE THAT THEY MAY POSSIBLY HAVE SOME SORT OF GRANT WRITING EXPERIENCE, OR COULD THEY WORK IN CONJUNCTION WITH. WE DON'T HAVE A GRANT PERSON HERE, RIGHT? NOT YET. OKAY. SO I KNOW BASICALLY EVERYTHING THE CONTRACT WOULD HAVE TO BE CRAFTED AS SUCH FOR THOSE THINGS THAT WE NEED. SO WE COULD INCLUDE THAT IN THERE. I JUST NOTICED I KEPT SEEING THE GRANT. YES, MA'AM. OKAY. LET'S

    [01:35:02]

    SEE. SO LIKE I SAID, WE JUST HAVE TO PRETTY MUCH BUILD A CONTRACT OUT FOR EVERYTHING THAT WE WOULD NEED THAT WE'D BE ASKING FOR, FOR THAT CONSULTANT, WE CAN BRING BACK OUR SCOPE OF WORK. OKAY. IF THAT'S THE ROUTE YOU WANT TO TAKE, WE'RE MORE THAN HAPPY TO BRING THAT BACK.

    SO THAT WE CAN INCLUDE ALL THAT YOU THINK WE SHOULD INCLUDE IN THAT. WE THINK WE CAN COVER ALL THE BASES, BUT WE'LL BRING IT BACK. OKAY. AND ANOTHER THING, MADAM MAYOR, I KNOW BECAUSE WE ARE, LIKE YOU SAID, IN THE MIDDLE OF OUR OUR FISCAL BUDGET SEASON, JUST IN, WHAT WOULD IT LOOK LIKE IF WE JUST WAITED UNTIL THE NEW BUDGET? I MEAN, I KNOW IT'S A NEED THAT WE THAT WE FILL THIS POSITION, BUT BECAUSE IS THAT SOMETHING THAT WE COULD POSSIBLY CONSIDER THAT GIVING US ENOUGH TIME TO ACTUALLY FIND AN INDIVIDUAL THAT WE WOULD HIRE FOR THE CITY AS AN EMPLOYEE, OR IS IT IS TIME OF THE ESSENCE, AND WE NEED TO BRING SOMEONE IN THIS POSITION NOW, RIGHT.

    COUNCILMAN? OKAY. SO THAT'S JUST NO, THAT'S JUST KIND OF JUST SORT OF THROWING IT OUT. THANK YOU. I YIELD. NO, THANK YOU. I WAS GOING TO ASK, HAVE WE DONE ANY TYPE OF RESEARCH ON A SIMILAR CONSULTING FIRMS? YES. AS A MATTER OF FACT, WE STARTED DOING RESEARCH ON PEOPLE WHO ARE ALREADY IN THAT BUSINESS. WE HAVEN'T FOUND ANYBODY THAT WOULD FIT IN TERMS OF THAT. IDENTIFIED THE AREAS THAT WE TALKED ABOUT BECAUSE WE THE PLAN CALLS FOR HOUSING, INCLUSIONARY HOUSING, MAYBE CONVERTING SOME OF THE VACANT LOTS IN THE CITY TO GARDENS AND SO FORTH, AND ALSO HAVING AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ARM OF IT. THEY STARTED THAT WITH THE FARMERS MARKET. SOME OF YOU ALL KNOW THAT PEOPLE START IN FARMER'S MARKET, AND THEN THEY WENT OFF INTO STOREFRONTS.

    SO THAT'S PART OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PIECE. BUT YES, SIR. SO THEY WANT TO CONVERT SOMETHING TO LIKE A URBAN GARDEN. WOULD THEY BE USING THEIR OWN RESOURCES OR WOULD THEY BE USING LEVERAGING CITY RESOURCES? THE PLAN HAS A COMPONENT IN IT THAT CALLS FOR IT'S LIKE A SEED BANK WHERE THE INDIVIDUAL WORKING WITH THE PROGRAM WOULD SUPPORT LOCAL URBAN GROWERS AND THERE ARE MANY DIFFERENT WAYS THAT YOU COULD DO THAT. I DON'T PROFESS I HAVE A HOME GARDEN, BUT I CAN'T TELL YOU RIGHT WHAT IT WOULD BE ON A FULL SCALE, BUT I THINK THAT WOULD BE PART OF THE ASSISTANCE THAT WILL BE OFFERED. AND YOU WERE SAYING YOU THINK THIS MIGHT. WELL, I WAS TRYING TO SEE HOW THIS MIGHT COST OVER 75 K. I WAS TRYING TO SAY, ARE THEY USING RESOURCES FOR LIKE ARE THEY JUST MANAGING AND SUPPORTING ALREADY ESTABLISHED, I GUESS GARDENS AND STUFF LIKE THAT? OR ARE THEY THEY'RE BUILDING, YOU KNOW, USING THEIR RESOURCES, HAVING TO GO OUT. AND THE IDEA WOULD BE TO LEVERAGE RESOURCES THAT ARE ALREADY AVAILABLE, COLLABORATE WITH ENTITIES THAT ARE ALREADY PROVIDING SERVICES. AND THAT'S WHAT THEY DID IN THE FIRST PHASE OF THIS. AND JUST CONTINUE TO GROW IT IN THAT MANNER. OKAY.

    AND ALSO, I WOULD EXPECT HOPEFULLY, I KNOW GRANT WRITING MIGHT BE A YOU KNOW, I WOULD ASSUME THAT THEY WILL PURSUE GRANTS. AND WOULD THEY BE WOULD THEY MANAGE THOSE IF THEY DID GET THEM THE GRANT? WOULD BE FOR THE CITY OF EAST POINT. SO THEY WOULD HELP TO PROCURE THAT. BUT IT WOULD BE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EAST POINT, NOT THE INDIVIDUAL THAT CONSULTANT. OKA.

    ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. I THINK TO THE POINT OF WHETHER OR NOT WE WAIT UNTIL JULY, THE CHALLENGE IS, IS THERE THAT THERE WILL PROBABLY BE SOME GRANTS AVAILABLE THAT WE WOULD FOREGO BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE A GRANT WRITER IN HOUSE, AND THEN GENERALLY, PEOPLE WHO DO THIS WORK KNOW OF OPPORTUNITIES THAT THEY COULD HELP US FOR. BUT THE CAVEAT TO THAT IS, IS THAT, YOU KNOW, IF WE'RE DOING A REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS, THE GUARANTEED BUDGET IS ONLY FOR SIX MONTHS, RIGHT? RIGHT. AND WHEN WE AND I THINK THAT'S IMPORTANT FOR THE SCOPE OF SERVICE OR THE SOLICITATION LIKE WHAT'S THE INITIAL TERM. RIGHT. AND WE PROBABLY NEED TO COMMIT

    [01:40:08]

    TO AT LEAST A YEAR SO THAT MEANS THAT THIS POSITION WOULD BE IN TWO FISCAL YEARS UNTIL WE GOT TO A POINT WHERE WE COULD PROBABLY OFFSET IT LATER WITH LIKE RENEWALS OR STUFF LIKE THAT. SO THERE'S PROS AND CONS EITHER WAY. I JUST THINK THAT IF WE GET SOMEBODY ENGAGED SOONER THAN LATER, THEY'RE PROBABLY GRANT OPPORTUNITIES AND OTHER THINGS THAT THEY COULD BRING TO US THAT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL FOR THE WORK THAT WE WOULDN'T HAVE FOR SIX MONTHS IF WE WAITED. SO, COUNCIL MEMBER, ONE MORE THING WAS THIS. AND HIS NAME, SIR, IT'S NOT SERVICE, BUT BUT BUT THAT'S THE ONE THAT WE WERE KIND OF OKAY. I JUST DIDN'T KNOW WHAT I MISSED THIS. YEAH. OKAY. YEAH. ALL RIGHT. THANKS. I THINK THE, YOU KNOW, DISCUSSION HAS BEEN LIKE THE LAST COUPLE OF TIMES, LIKE WHETHER IT'S GOING TO BE AN EMPLOYEE, WHETHER IT'S GOING TO BE A CONSULTANT, IF IT'S A CONSULTANT, WE HAVE TO DO A SOLICITATION BECAUSE IT'S OVER 25,000. AND WHILE WE KNOW, YOU KNOW, SOME INDIVIDUALS OR INDIVIDUAL THAT HAS AN AMAZING EXPERIENCE IN THIS AREA TO NOT GET AHEAD OF THE PROCESS AND MAKE SURE WE HAVE THAT OPEN PROCESS AND MAKE SURE PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT IT, INCLUDING HIM AND OTHERS, SO THAT WE CAN MAKE SURE WE DON'T IN ANY WAY JEOPARDIZE THE PROCUREMENT EXPERIENCE OR THE JOB APPLICATION PROCESS. IT SOUNDS LIKE STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT WE DO A CONSULTANT. SO FOR TONIGHT, IS THERE ANY OBJECTION TO THAT? AND THEN IF THERE'S NO OBJECTIONS TO THAT, WE CAN GET THE SCOPE OF WORK AT THE JANUARY 13TH. WE COULD DO IT. THE 16TH IF YOU WANT. OH THE 16TH, BLESS YOU. BLESS YOU. WE CAN PUT IT ON THE AGENDA FOR NEXT MONDAY FOR SCOPE OF WORK AND HAVE A DISCUSSION SO THAT THEN THEY COULD PUT OUT THE SOLICITATION AND BRING US SOMETHING. MAYBE THEN WE USUALLY DO WITH 30 DAYS FOR THE SOLICITATION. YES, MA'AM. AND THEN WE'D HAVE SOMETHING LIKE TOP OF YEAR TO TRY TO GET AT LEAST SOME WORK ENGAGED. ALL RIGHT. YEAH. ARE WE ABLE TO PUT A CAP ON HOW MUCH WE PAY THE INCLUDE THAT. YES. SO GENERALLY WITH THE SOLICITATIONS WE CREATE THE SCOPE. AND THEN PEOPLE TELL US WHAT THEY'RE CHARGES FOR AND THAT PRICING IS A PART OF EVALUATION. WHAT THE PRICING AND THE SCOPE THAT THEY RESPOND BACK TO US WITH. SO YOU KNOW, A LOT OF CONSULTANTS WILL LOOK TO SEE WHAT WE'VE ALREADY BUDGETED FOR TO THEN MAKE THEIR PROPOSALS OR CREATE THEIR PROPOSALS. AND SO WE DON'T GENERALLY PUT THE AMOUNT IN THE SOLICITATION. WE PUT THE SCOPE OF WORK. AND THEN THEY TELL US WHAT THEY CAN DO IT FOR. AND THEN THAT'S THE COMPETITION IN THE PROCESS, BECAUSE I'M JUST SAYING IT'S I THINK THE DIRECTION KIND OF CHANGED FROM AN EMPLOYEE TO US HIRING AN EMPLOYEE, TO US GOING TO CONSULTING GROUP. AND I THINK THAT 75 K, YOU KNOW, BUT YOU JUST SAID WE DON'T PUT THE AMOUNT BECAUSE OF COURSE MY CONSULTING FIRM I'M LIKE, YES, IT'S GOING TO COST 75 K. SO I THINK WHAT HAPPENS IS IF IT IS WITHOUT IF IT'S OUTSIDE OF WHAT WE'VE ALREADY BUDGETED, STAFF WOULD HAVE TO ASK US FOR A BUDGET AMENDMENT IF WE GO WITH SOMEBODY THAT'S MORE THAN WHAT WE BUDGETED, THEY'D EITHER DO AN INNER DEPARTMENT TRANSFER FROM FUNDS WITHIN IT TO TRY TO MAKE IT UP, OR ADD BECAUSE IT'S CONSULTING SERVICES. SO THERE'S THE ABILITY TO DO THAT, OR THEY WOULD COME BACK TO US WITH THE BUDGET AMENDMENT, WHICH MIGHT INCLUDE OTHER AMENDMENTS FOR US TO DO IT IN THAT WAY, $75,000 OVER 12 OVER 12 MONTHS IS $6,250. $75,000 OVER SIX MONTHS IS $12,500. THAT'S A HUGE RANGE. I DON'T THINK. ME NOT SPEAK.

    THIS ISN'T MY AREA, BUT LIKE 62, 50 TO 12,005 IS KIND OF WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT. IF WE USE THE BUDGET THAT WE HAVE RIGHT NOW. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. AND THEN WE'RE ABOUT TO GO THROUGH THE BUDGET PROCESS FOR THE FY 25 BUDGET. RIGHT. AND THEN WE CAN MAKE DECISIONS IF WE WANT TO INCREASE THIS IN THAT BUDGET. OR THEY COULD DO BUDGET AMENDMENTS. OKAY. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER SHROPSHIRE THANK YOU. AND I WAS GOING TO SAY IF YOU HAVE THE SCOPE OF WORK BEFORE MONDAY, IF YOU COULD SEND IT OUT IN THE EMAIL, THAT WAY EVERYBODY CAN GET TO LOOK AT IT AND ANY QUESTIONS OR CHANGES THEY ALREADY HAVE OPPOSED TO WAIT UNTIL MONDAY AND THEN WE DECIDE MAYBE IT SHOULD GO TO WORK SESSION, JUST SEND IT TO US IN THE IN AN EMAIL AND WE CAN

    [01:45:02]

    ALREADY HAVE OUR QUESTIONS OR ANY CHANGES OR ANYTHING. YES MA'AM. THANK YOU. MADAM DEPUTY CITY CLERK PLACED THIS ON THE AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION. WE WOULDN'T TAKE ACTION AT THAT POINT, BUT WE CAN REVIEW THE SCOPE OF WORK. NUMBER 13, THE CHIP AND A GRANT FROM DCA.

    [III.13. Council Discussion and Possible Action on a Resolution Authorizing the Submission of the 2025 Community HOME Investment Program (CHIP) Grant Application to the Georgia Department of Community Affairs (DCA)]

    MADAM, MISS JESSIE. MADAM MAYOR, MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, I AM GOING TO ASK FRANK WHITFIELD TO COME UP AND TALK ABOUT THE OPPORTUNITY THAT THE CITY HAS WITH THIS GRANT, AND HE'LL TALK BRIEFLY ABOUT SOME OF THE OTHER HOUSING RELATED PROJECTS WE'RE WORKING ON. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING, MADAM MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, AS WAS MENTIONED, MY NAME IS FRANK WHITFIELD. I'M THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MANAGER OUT OF THE OFFICE OF EQUITY, INCLUSION AND EMPOWERMENT. THE HANDOUT YOU'RE GETTING IS A BRIEF MEMO THAT GIVES AN OVERVIEW OF KIND OF WHAT OUR DEPARTMENT IS UP TO IN TERMS OF THE HOUSING SPACE. SO I'LL GIVE A SECOND FOR EVERYBODY TO GET A COPY. AND IN PARTICULAR THE DECISION TONIGHT IS GOING TO BE AROUND THE CHIP GRANT PROGRAM. AGAIN THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT TO YOU ALL TONIGHT. I REALLY BELIEVE THAT THE CITY OF EAST POINT IS AT A REALLY UNIQUE INFLECTION POINT AND HAS A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO DEMONSTRATE WHAT'S POSSIBLE IN TERMS OF THE HOUSING SPACE. AS YOU KNOW, HOUSING IS A NATIONAL ISSUE RIGHT NOW IN TERMS OF AFFORDABILITY, ACCESS, HOMELESSNESS. THE MAYOR REFERENCED THE POINT IN TIME COUNT AND THAT REPORT AND HOW IT'S SHOWING THE MISMATCH BETWEEN THE SUPPLY AND DEMAND NEEDS IN TERMS OF HOUSING. SO A PART OF MY MANDATE IS TO ADDRESS NOT ONLY MORE AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, BUT OVERALL MIXED INCOME HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, AS WELL AS MANAGE PROGRAMS THAT YOU ALREADY HAD EXISTING. WHEN I GOT HERE TWO MONTHS AGO, IN PARTICULAR, THE NO COST MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM. SO I'M GOING TO GIVE YOU A COUPLE UPDATES AND THEN DIVE STRAIGHT INTO THIS CHIP GRANT PROGRAM. SO THE NO COST MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM IS SOMETHING THAT THIS CITY COUNCIL AGREED, PASSED AN AGREEMENT ON AUGUST 19TH WITH HOUSE PROUD AND GREENHEART CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE NO COST MINOR HOME REPAIRS TO SENIOR CITIZENS AND VETERANS WHO RESIDE IN EAST POINT AT A FUTURE MEETING, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT WE SHOULD FOCUS ON THE WAITLIST THAT HOUSE PROUD HAS, AND SINCE THAT MEETING, HOUSE PROUD HAS BEEN GOING THROUGH THAT WAITLIST OF 49 RESIDENTS TO DETERMINE THEIR ELIGIBILITY AND PREPARE THEM FOR THE REPAIR NEEDS. OUR GOAL IS TO HAVE THAT LIST LIST VERIFIED AND COMPLETE BY THE END OF THIS YEAR, AND FOR OUR PARTNER GREENHEART CONSTRUCTION TO BEGIN WORK ON THOSE HOMES. THOSE ARE REPAIRS THAT WERE SLATED TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN A $10,000 THRESHOLD. SO THOSE ARE MINOR HOME REPAIRS. AND WHAT I'M ASKING FOR APPROVAL FOR TONIGHT IS TO APPLY FOR A GRANT THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS HERE AT THE STATE TO DO MAJOR HOME REPAIRS. AND SO THIS PROGRAM IS SOMETHING WE'VE APPLIED FOR LAST YEAR, AND WE WERE UNFORTUNATELY UNSUCCESSFUL IN OUR GRANT APPLICATION. WE REACHED OUT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND GOT FEEDBACK ON OUR APPLICATION IN TERMS OF WHY DIDN'T WE GET FUNDED? WE SCORED WELL IN ALMOST EVERY CATEGORY THAT WE HAD EXCEPT FOR CAPACITY. WE HADN'T DEMONSTRATED THAT WE HAD SOMEONE WITH EXPERIENCE ON STAFF THAT COULD MANAGE THE PROGRAM. SO THEREFORE WE DIDN'T GET ANY POINTS IN THAT SECTION. SO WE I SHARED MY BACKGROUND WITH ONE OF THE PROGRAM OFFICERS WITH THAT PROGRAM, AND SHE GAVE US CONFIDENCE SHE COULDN'T GIVE US ASSURANCE. BUT SHE GAVE US CONFIDENCE THAT MY BACKGROUND IN MANAGING THIS PROGRAM WOULD HELP US FARE MUCH BETTER IN THIS APPLICATION CYCLE. THAT APPLICATION IS DUE ON JANUARY 31ST. IT ALSO HAS A $500 PROCESSING FEE FOR THE APPLICATION, WHICH AGAIN, THIS IS SOMETHING WE APPLIED FOR LAST YEAR, BUT WERE UNFORTUNATELY UNSUCCESSFUL. THIS IS A FEDERALLY FUNDED PROGRAM THAT GOES THROUGH THE STATE. A COUPLE OTHER QUICK UPDATES. THE DEMOLITION PROGRAM THAT WE CONDUCTED OVER THIS PAST YEAR, ALL OF THOSE EIGHT PROPERTIES HAVE BEEN DEMOLISHED PER THE CONTRACTOR, GMP CONSTRUCTION HAULING AND ENVIRONMENTAL. SO WE'RE CLOSING THAT OUT. AND THEN LASTLY, I LISTENED TO ONE OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AND IT WAS MENTIONED THAT WE WANTED TO DO MORE TO INCENTIVIZE FIRST RESPONDERS TO BECOME HOMEOWNERS HERE IN THE CITY OF EAST POINT. AND SO WITH THAT MANDATE, I REACHED OUT TO SOME LOCAL REAL ESTATE AGENTS AND GOT CONNECTED WITH A MORTGAGE LENDER. AND WE

    [01:50:02]

    RECENTLY LAST WEEK HOSTED A WORKSHOP HIGHLIGHTING THE HOMES FOR HEROES PROGRAM, WHICH IS A NATIONAL PROGRAM THAT WE HAVE A LOCAL LENDER WHO PARTICIPATES IN THAT PROGRAM WHERE THEY PROVIDE DOWN PAYMENT ASSISTANCE TO FIRST RESPONDERS. SO WE HAD THE WORKSHOP YESTERDAY OR LAST WEEK.

    WE HAD AROUND 40 PLUS EMPLOYEES PARTICIPATE IN THAT, AND WE HOPE TO CONTINUE TO DO THOSE SORT OF WORKSHOPS. AND WE ALSO HAD OTHER STAFF, NOT JUST POLICE AND FIRE, BUT ALSO ALL STAFF ENCOURAGING THEM TO BECOME HOMEOWNERS HERE IN EAST POINT. AND LASTLY, I'VE ALSO ENGAGED WITH BUSINESS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIT, ALSO KNOWN AS BIDA, WHO'S ALSO GOING THROUGH A REBRAND OF EMPOWER EAST POINT AND TALK WITH THEM ABOUT ESTABLISHING A HOMEBUYER FUND FOR THE CITY OF EAST POINT, SOMETHING THAT'S DEDICATED JUST TO EAST POINT. THERE'S A LOT OF HOMEBUYER PROGRAMS OUT THERE, BUT WE BOTH FEEL THAT IT'S IMPORTANT TO HAVE SOMETHING DEDICATED SPECIFICALLY FOR EAST POINT RESIDENTS. SO THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE'RE IN DISCUSSIONS ABOUT WHAT THAT COULD LOOK LIKE AND HOW TO SCALE THAT, TO MAKE SURE IT'S A SUSTAINABLE FUND THAT'S CREATED.

    SO HERE'S MY CONTACT INFORMATION. HERE IS BELOW. IF YOU EVER WANT TO REACH OUT. YOU KNOW, I KNOW IT'S IMPORTANT TO GO THROUGH THE CITY MANAGER. SO BE SURE TO CC THE CITY MANAGER IF YOU DO REACH OUT. BUT THE DECISION FOR TODAY IS REALLY AROUND SEEKING A RESOLUTION FOR US TO APPLY FOR THE GRANT. THAT'S DUE ON JANUARY 31ST, 2025. THANK YOU. SO THE BEST WE CAN DO TONIGHT IS CONSENT AGENDA FOR MONDAY. SO I JUST WANT TO CAVEAT THAT BECAUSE WE DIDN'T PUT ACTION MIGHT BE TAKEN. AND I SAW THAT THE APPLICATION IS DUE JANUARY 31ST 2025. SO AS WE'RE TALKING WE CAN POTENTIALLY PUT IT ON THE CONSENT AGENDA BECAUSE THIS IS A WORK SESSION. WE DON'T WANT TO TAKE ACTION ON UNLESS THAT GOT YOU. SORRY ABOUT THAT. NOT NO WORRIES. COUNCIL MEMBER BUTLER HAS. COUNCILMAN CLARK, HOW ARE YOU DOING? FORMER MAYOR? I'M DOING OKAY. IT'S GOOD TO HAVE YOU HERE. MY QUESTION IS REGARDING THE $10,000 THRESHOLD FOR THE SENIORS. COULD YOU TELL US WHAT THAT ENCOMPASSES? AND MY SECOND PART OF THAT QUESTION IS GREEN HEART CONSTRUCTION. IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT WE ARE FUNDING TWO NON-PROFITS. SO COULD YOU TELL US ABOUT THIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AS WELL? SURE. SO THROUGH YOU, MADAM MAYOR, TO COUNCIL. SO THERE'S TWO PARTS OF THE QUESTION. ONE IS AROUND OUR TWO VENDORS. SO HOUSE PROUD IS BASED OUT OF ATLANTA. BUT THEY DO HOME REPAIRS MINOR HOME REPAIRS. I'D SAY ALL AROUND THE COUNTRY. THEY HAVE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF BIRMINGHAM WHERE THEY'RE ACTUALLY DOING THIS IN BIRMINGHAM AS WELL. BUT THEY ARE A NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION THAT DOES HOME REPAIRS. THEY RAISE FUNDS FOR IT. THEY HAVE A LOT OF SIMILAR CRITERIA THAT WE HAVE FOR OUR PROGRAM TARGETING VETERANS AND SENIORS, FOLKS WHO ARE 80% OF AMI. SO THEY HAVE A LOT OF SIMILARITIES THAT WE DESIGN THE PROGRAM. GREEN HEART CONSTRUCTION IS A FOR PROFIT COMPANY, AND THIS IS WHAT THEY DO FOR THEIR BUSINESS IS DUE MINOR OR THEY DO ALL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. BUT WE'VE ENGAGED THEM AROUND THIS LOW NO COST, MINOR HOME REPAIRS, WHICH IN ESSENCE IS TO HELP FOLKS GET UP TO CODE. SO WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT SIDING PAINTING, WE SAY DRY SAFE. SO IF THERE'S ANY WINDOWS THAT NEED REPAIRED, ANY HOLES IN THE ROOF, ANY SIDING ISSUE, ANY ACCESSIBILITY ISSUE, NEED A RAMP BUILT SO THAT SOMEONE WITH A WHEELCHAIR CAN BE ABLE TO ACCESS THEIR HOME SAFELY. SO IT'S AND IT'S THOSE MINOR THINGS. IT'S NOT THE SYSTEMS THING, WHICH IS THE GRANT THAT WE'RE TRYING TO APPLY FOR WHEN SOMEONE HAS AN ELECTRICAL ISSUE OR THEY NEED A FULL ROOF OR THEY NEED A FULL HVAC SYSTEM, SOME OF THESE MAJOR REPAIRS, THEY COST MUCH MORE THAN 10,000. THAT'S WHAT THE GRANT WE'RE LOOKING TO APPLY FO. BUT THE MINOR IS GOING TO BE MORE I DON'T WANT TO SAY SURFACE LEVEL, BUT THEY'RE NOT AS INTENSIVE. SO AND COUNCILWOMAN SHROPSHIRE, IF YOU CAN HELP ME WITH THIS TOO. SO I KNOW HOUSE PROUD HAD A LIST OF EASTPOINTE RESIDENTS. AND HERE YOU'RE SAYING THAT 49. IS THAT CORRECT? YES. HAVE YOU GONE THROUGH THOSE? THE LIST OF THE 49 YET TO DETERMINE THE GRANT RECIPIENTS? YES. SO HOUSE PROUD HAS GONE THROUGH ABOUT HALF OF THAT LIST. SO FAR. AND SO THE FIRST ENGAGEMENT WITH THAT LIST IS ONE. ARE YOU STILL INTERESTED IN THE PROGRAM? TWO LET'S VERIFY YOU'RE ELIGIBLE FOR THE PROGRAM.

    AND THREE DOING AN INITIAL ASSESSMENT OF THE TYPE OF REPAIRS THAT ARE NEEDED. SO THEY'RE ABOUT HALFWAY THROUGH THAT LIST RIGHT NOW, AT LEAST HALFWAY THROUGH WITH THE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. I JUST NEED SOME CLARIFICATION. IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT WE WOULD PROVIDE THE FUNDING TO HOUSE PROUD, AND THEN THEY WOULD PICK THE CONTRACTOR. SO ARE WE DOING SOMETHING DIFFERENT NOW? YEAH, THAT IS NOT HOW THE AGREEMENT WAS PASSED, THAT IT WAS AN

    [01:55:05]

    AGREEMENT PASSED WITH TWO ORGANIZATIONS AND I'M GOING TO DEFER BECAUSE THERE WAS A SECOND ORGANIZATION, TOO. MADAM MAYOR, THAT WAS THAT IS GRANT. BUT I THOUGHT THERE WERE TWO NONPROFITS THAT DEALT WITH. AND IS THAT THE ONE THAT BUT ONE IS LOCATED HERE IN THE CITY, CORRECT. SO HOUSE PROUD IS WORKING WITH AND I ALREADY HAD THE LIST BECAUSE THEY PROVIDED FOR THE COUNTY AND THEY DIDN'T HAVE FUNDING SPECIFICALLY FOR EASTPOINTE GREEN HEART ALSO BECAUSE WE HAD TO DO A SOLICITATION. SO HOUSE PROUD AND GREEN HEART RESPONDED. THEN THE QUESTION IS WHY IS GREEN HEART THE ONLY ONE DOING CONSTRUCTION AND NOT HOUSE PROUD? YEAH. SO THE I THINK THE INITIAL VISION WAS FOR HOUSE PROUD TO DO THE CONSTRUCTION. I THINK SOME OF THE CONVERSATIONS I'VE HAD WITH THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR IS IN TERMS OF BEING COMPLIANT WITH THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT FUNDS. THERE'S A THERE'S A NUMBER OF HURDLES THAT ARE CREATED WITH BEING COMPLIANT WITH THAT. AND ONE OF THEM IS I'LL JUST GIVE YOU THE SCENARIO.

    SO AND IF THIS WAS NON ARPA FUNDS, WE COULD GO ON A BLOCK AND SAY ALL RIGHT ALL THREE OF THESE HOMES NEED HVAC AND IT'S GOING TO COST 7000 HERE 7000 HERE AND 7000 HERE. SO WE'RE GOOD. LET'S GO AHEAD AND ROCK AND ROLL WITH ARPA. THE MOMENT YOU GO OVER THAT $10,000 THRESHOLD, YOU HAVE TO THEN GO THROUGH A PROCUREMENT PROCESS. AND FOR A NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION LIKE HOUSE PROUD, THAT IS A TON A BIG LIFT FOR THEM ADMINISTRATIVELY THAT TAKES THEM AWAY FROM THEIR MISSION. AND ALSO THEY DON'T FEEL LIKE IT. IT'S A REALLY A DRAIN ON THEIR RESOURCES. SO THEIR PREFERENCE IS TO BE MORE AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROJECT MANAGER OF THIS. SINCE WE'VE ALREADY SIGNED THE AGREEMENT WITH GREEN HEART CONSTRUCTION, THEY WOULD VET THAT LIST, GO THROUGH, MANAGE REPORTING, BUT THEY WOULDN'T BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT PROCUREMENT PROCESS BECAUSE WE'VE ALREADY DONE IT. SO THAT IS THE LOGIC BEHIND HOUSE PROUD BEING MORE OF A PROJECT MANAGER AND GREEN HEART CONSTRUCTION DOING WHAT THEY DO BECAUSE WHAT HOUSE PROUD IS TYPICAL BUSINESS MODEL IS THEY DON'T HAVE STAFF THAT ARE DOING THESE REPAIRS WHEN THEY GET A CONTRACT, THEY THEN GO CONTRACT OUT THE WORK AND FIND PEOPLE WHO CAN DO IT. SO IN ESSENCE, WE'VE ALREADY DONE THAT WORK FOR THEM BY SIGNING THE AGREEMENT WITH GREEN HEART CONSTRUCTION. MY FINAL QUESTION THEN, SO WHO MONITORS? WELL, I GUESS HOUSE PROUD WILL MONITOR SO GREEN HEART. GREEN HEART. ALL RIGHT. THIS COST $7,000. SO THEY WON'T SPEND THE WHOLE TEN. YEP.

    SO THEY MONITOR THAT. YES. THROUGH YOU MADAM MAYOR TO COUNCIL. SO YES THIS WOULD BE THERE'S TWO LAYERS. ONE IS HOUSE PROUD IS GOING TO OVERSEE AS THEY THIS IS WHAT THEY DO EVERY DAY OVERSEEING THEIR CONTRACTORS AND VENDORS. THEY'RE GOING TO OVERSEE TO MAKE SURE THAT THINGS ARE DONE CORRECTLY. THINGS ARE COMPLIANT. THE CHECKOUTS WILL BE THERE. BUT I ALSO WILL BE MONITORING THIS PROCESS AS WELL OF BOTH HOUSE PROUD AND GREEN HEART CONSTRUCTION. OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. COUNCIL MEMBER SHROPSHIRE, THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION. AND I WAS GOING TO ASK FOR AN UPDATE AND THAT IS PRETTY MUCH CORRECT. AND WHAT HAPPENED IS WHEN THEY WHEN THE RESIDENTS INITIALLY SIGNED UP AND THAT'S HOW WE CAME TO A DOLLAR AMOUNT, THEY KIND OF KNEW WHAT EACH SENIOR NEEDED, WHETHER IT WAS RAMPS IN THE BATHROOM, WHETHER IT WAS THE FLOOR SINKING IN IN THE BATHROOM. THEY KIND OF KNEW WHAT IT WOULD COST TO MAKE THOSE REPAIRS IN THOSE HOMES WITH THE SENIORS ARE. SO WHEN IT WHEN WE INITIALLY RECEIVED IT, THE CITY WAS JUST GOING TO WORK WITH HOUSE PROUD. BUT THEN WE FOUND OUT WE IT HAD TO BE BIDDED OUT. AND THAT'S HOW WE GOT TO HOUSE PROUD. AND THE OTHER CONTRACTOR, BASED ON THE REGULATIONS OF USING THE AQUA FUNDS. SO HOUSE PROUD IS STILL THERE BECAUSE THEY HOLD THE LIST OF ALL THE SENIORS. AND THEN THIS COMPANY COMES IN AND MAKE THE REPAIRS TO THE HOMES THAT HOUSE PROUD. ALREADY KNOW ABOUT WHAT THEY THEY KNEW THAT NEEDED TO BE DONE IN THOSE HOUSES. SO THANK YOU FOR THIS. AND THANK YOU FOR ALSO BRINGING UP THE FACT ABOUT FIRST RESPONDER HOUSING. WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THAT FOR QUITE SOME TIME AS TO HOW WE CAN PUT THAT TOGETHER TO OFFER HOUSING TO FIRST RESPONDERS, THAT ALSO, I HOPE, COULD TIE IN TO BANK OWNED HOUSES, BECAUSE THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE HAVE IS A LOT OF HOUSES THAT ARE VACANT, THAT'S OWNED BY THE BANK. AND WE'RE GOING TO I'M GOING TO BRING THIS BACK UP BECAUSE I KNOW WE SUPPOSED TO HAVE A REGISTRY OF WHEN WHO IS

    [02:00:04]

    OWNING THE PROPERTY TO KNOW AND THAT WOULD ALSO HELP AS WELL WITH FIRST RESPONDERS INTO THESE HOMES AS WELL. AND ALSO, I DO LIKE THE FACT THAT YOU TALKED ABOUT HOME OWNERSHIP IN EASTPOINTE. THAT'S ANOTHER THING THAT PLAYS INTO WHAT WE'RE WE HAVE AND WHAT WE DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY ABOUT HOW DO WE GET MAKE IT WHERE PEOPLE CAN BECOME HOMEOWNERS IN EASTPOINTE, WHETHER THEY'RE LIVING WHEREVER THEY'RE LIVING, TO GIVE THEM THE TOOLS AND THE TRAINING OR WHATEVER THEY NEED OR HELP THEM WITH DOWN PAYMENT ASSISTANCE IN BECOMING A HOMEOWNER, THAT ALSO TIES INTO THE BANK OWNED HOMES, AS WELL AS INVESTMENT PROPERTY THAT PEOPLE ARE JUST HOLDING ON TO. IT ALSO COULD PLAY INTO OUR 50 WORST BECAUSE THOSE PEOPLE HAVE TO BRING THOSE PROPERTY UP TO CODE STANDARD BECAUSE THEY PAY MORE TAXES ON THEM, AND ONCE THEY BRING THEM UP TO CODE STANDARD, MAYBE THEY CAN COME INTO COMPLIANCE AS TO FIXING IT, AS TO WHERE PEOPLE COULD PURCHASE THOSE HOMES. SO THIS RIGHT HERE IS, IS REALLY GOOD, BUT I'M MOST EXCITED ABOUT THE FACT THAT WE ARE STARTING TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE SENIOR HOMES, BECAUSE THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WAS BROUGHT TO COUNCIL. COUNCIL MEMBER CALLOWAY BROUGHT LISA JONES FLOWERS, WHO IS A RESIDENT OF EASTPOINTE. AND THEN I THINK I BROUGHT UP THE FACT ABOUT THESE SENIOR HOMES, WHICH I DID, AND HOW WE CAN MAKE REPAIRS TO THEIR HOMES BECAUSE THEY WERE GETTING ON THE LIST.

    BUT THERE WAS NOTHING IN PLACE FOR THEM TO GET THEIR HOMES FIXED BECAUSE WE KNOW HOW PRIDE WORKS WITH ATLANTA AND ATLANTA, HAVE PEOPLE LIKE TYLER PERRY AND OTHER PEOPLE INVESTING TO FIX UP THOSE HOMES. BUT THEN WE HAD TO MAKE A DECISION OF HOW WE WERE GOING TO INVEST TO HELP FIX UP OUR SENIOR HOMES, BECAUSE WE DO KNOW THAT WE DO WANT THEM TO AGE IN PLACE, BUT WE ALSO WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE PROVIDED WITH A SAFE ENVIRONMENT AND THEY CAN CONTINUE TO STAY IN THEIR HOUSE AND MAINTAIN THEIR HOUSE. BUT THEY WE REALIZE THAT THEY DO NEED A LITTLE HELP BECAUSE THEY'VE GOTTEN TO THE POINT WHERE THEIR INCOMES WON'T ALLOW THEM TO DO THE THINGS THAT THEY USED TO DO. SO IF WE CAN HELP THEM GET FIX IT UP TO MAKE THEM COMFORTABLE AND SAFE, THEN I'M GLAD THAT THIS IS ONE OF THE PROGRAMS THAT WE HAVE THAT WILL HELP THEM. AWESOME. MADAM MAYOR, OH, CAN I RESPOND? YEAH, YOU CAN RESPOND. AND THEN COUNCIL MEMBE, ATHENS, COUNCILMEMBER MITCHELL.

    COUNCILMEMBER ROGERS. YEAH, I'LL JUST SHARE, YOU KNOW, THE OFFICE OF EQUITY AND THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR OF YOUR COMMENTS, COUNCILWOMAN. I THINK IT'S SPOT ON IN TERMS OF WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT WHY THE OFFICE OF EQUITY IS DOING THIS WORK. IF WE THINK ABOUT OUR SENIORS NOT BEING DISPLACED, NOT BEING PRICED OUT, SOME DEVELOPERS ACTUALLY PREY ON SENIORS WHO ARE HAVE CODE VIOLATIONS. SO THEY REALIZE, OH, THEY GOT COVID. HEY, I CAN BAIL YOU OUT OF THIS. HERE'S A CHECK.

    SO I'M APPROACHING THIS WORK FROM THAT EQUITY LENS TO MAKE SURE THAT, YOU KNOW, THE LEAST OF US IS BEING THOUGHT OF, YOU KNOW, WORKING WITH SHANNON AND YOLANDA, THEY HAVE THEIR, YOU KNOW, BOOTS ON THE GROUND. AND WE ARE APPROACHING THIS WORK FROM AN EQUITY LENS. FROM THAT STANDPOINT. MR. WHITFIELD, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR PRESENTATION. VERY INFORMATIVE.

    QUICK QUESTION FOR ME. SO FOR THE MINOR REPAIRS, THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT PER HOUSEHOLD IS $10,000 FOR THE CHIP GRANT THROUGH DCA. I KNOW THAT WE'RE APPLYING FOR TO BE ABLE TO ASSIST 12 HOUSEHOLDS. WHAT IS THAT MAXIMUM AMOUNT PER HOUSEHOLD AND IS THAT THE MAXIMUM FOR WHICH WE CAN APPLY? YEP. THANK YOU. AND THROUGH YOU CHAIRWOMAN TO COUNCIL. SO WE ARE APPLYING FOR $500,000. THAT'S THE MAX THAT YOU CAN APPLY FOR. AND THANK YOU FOR THIS QUESTION. I'M APOLOGIZE THAT IT WASN'T I DIDN'T SPEAK ON IT EARLIER. SO $500,000. AND WE'RE SAYING AT LEAST 12 HOMES.

    SO WE'RE EXPECTING THESE REPAIRS TO BE AT MAX OUT AT 40,000 PER HOME. SO IF SOME COME UNDER THAT AND WE HAVE A LITTLE EXTRA BUDGET, WE CAN DO MORE. BUT THE MAX WE'RE LOOKING AT IS 40 K PER HOME. AND THE DOLLAR AMOUNT THAT WE'RE APPLYING FOR IS 500,000. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER MITCHELL, THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENTATION. I KIND OF HAD THE SAME QUESTION. SO THANK YOU FOR ANSWERING THAT. I KNOW YOU MENTIONED THAT HOUSE PROUD. I THINK THERE YOU SAID ONCE IT GOES OVER $10,000, IT BECOMES LIKE THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS BECOMES CUMBERSOME. SO IF WE DO GET THIS CHIP GRANT, WHO WILL MANAGE IT OR HOW WOULD THAT WORK? YEAH. SO TBD TO BE

    [02:05:02]

    DETERMINED AND THROUGH THROUGH YOU CHAIRWOMAN TO COUNCIL, IT WOULD BE TO BE DETERMINED HOW WE WANT TO MANAGE THAT PROGRAM. IF WE WANT TO DO IT IN HOUSE, IF WE STILL FEEL LIKE THE CAPACITY IS NOT WHERE WE'D LIKE IT TO BE, AND WE'D LIKE TO GO THROUGH HOUSE PROUD, YOU CAN PARTNER WITH A NONPROFIT LIKE HOUSE PROUD TO MANAGE THE INITIATIVE. I THINK THERE WILL BE NATURAL PROGRESSION TO WORK WITH AND MOMENTUM TO WORK WITH HOUSE PROUD, BECAUSE THEY'RE ALREADY GOING TO BE IDENTIFYING FAMILIES. AND SOME OF THESE, THEY'RE GOING TO LOOK AT AND SAY $10,000 ISN'T GOING TO CUT IT. LET'S PUT YOU ON THIS OTHER LIST FOR WHEN THIS PROGRAM OPENS UP.

    SO I THINK THEY'RE A NATURAL PARTNER FOR US. BUT THAT'S TO BE DETERMINED. AND THAT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE SPECIFIED IN ORDER TO APPLY. I ALSO SEE I KNOW YOU MENTIONED YOU APPLIED FOR THIS GRANT BEFORE. I KNOW WE DON'T HAVE A GRANT WRITER. SO WHO WOULD BE KIND OF HANDLING THE APPLICATION PROCESS. YEAH. SO THROUGH YOU, MADAM MAYOR TO COUNCIL, WE HAVE A GRANT WRITER CONSULTANT. WE HAVE A CONSULTANT THAT IS WRITING GRANTS WHO PREPARED LAST YEAR'S GRANT. AS I MENTIONED, WE REVIEWED LAST YEAR'S GRANT PROPOSAL. 80% OF IT WAS TIGHTENED READY TO GO. SO A LOT OF THIS WAS JUST COPY AND PASTE. THERE WAS A COUPLE OF THINGS WE HAD NEEDED TO UPDATE.

    AS I MENTIONED, THE CAPACITY ISSUE. WE NEEDED TO MAKE SURE WE ADDRESSED, BUT FOR THE MOST PART THAT THAT CONSULTANT HAS BEEN GREAT TO WORK WITH. AND THEN WE HAVE A GRANT COORDINATOR HERE WHO SPOKE BEFORE YOU BEFORE VICTOR CEPHAS. AND I'VE BEEN WORKING WITH HIM ON MAKING SURE IT'S SUBMITTED. OKAY. THANK YOU. COUNCILMEMBER MYRA, AND THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR PRESENTATION. MR. WHITFIELD. AND TO PIGGYBACK ON WHAT COUNCIL MEMBER SHROPSHIRE SAID, THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF DISCUSSION ON THE HOUSING PROGRAM AND SHE'S BEEN INSTRUMENTAL ON THIS HOUSING INITIATIVE. BUT WHAT I'M MOST INTERESTED IN SEEING OR HEARING ABOUT IS DELIVERABLES AND HOW WE MARRY EVERYTHING TOGETHER. FROM WHAT SHE HAS TALKED ABOUT, OTHERS HAVE TALKED ABOUT, ESPECIALLY THE PIECE FOR THE PUBLIC SAFETY HOUSING INITIATIVE. BROOKVIEW AND DUNWOODY OFFER THEIR OFFICERS A STIPEND TO LIVE WITHIN THE CITY. BUT I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO KNOW HOW WE ENGAGE REAL ESTATE AGENTS. I GUESS A FOOLPROOF PLAN AS TO HOW YOU WILL GO ABOUT A TIMELINE WITH BRINGING ALL OF THIS TOGETHER WITH WHAT IS CURRENTLY HAPPENING NOW, I THINK COUNCIL MEMBER SHROPSHIRE MENTIONED BANK OWNED HOUSING, VACANT HOUSING REGISTRY, PUBLIC SAFETY HOUSING. BUT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE IS HOW ARE YOU GOING TO GO ABOUT CARRYING ALL OF THAT OUT LIKE WHAT IS OUR PLAN, WHAT'S THE TIMELINE AND THE DELIVERABLE FOR A COMPLETE AND CONSCIOUS HOUSING INITIATIVE PROGRAM, WHICH YOU DON'T HAVE TO ANSWER TONIGHT, BUT I GUESS IN THE NEAR FUTURE, LIKE WHAT ARE WHAT IS GOING TO BE DONE TO TACKLE WHAT EVERYONE HAS TALKED ABOUT? YEAH. THROUGH YOU, MADAM MAYOR, TO COUNCIL, I WOULD SAY I CAN GIVE YOU A LITTLE BIT AS YOU MENTIONED, YOU KNOW, THIS THIS THIS IS COMPREHENSIVE AND IT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN OVERNIGHT.

    I'VE BEEN HERE FOR TWO MONTHS. SO LET'S LET'S PREFACE WITH THA. SECOND TO THAT, I CAN TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT MY APPROACH AND HOW I THINK THIS NEEDS TO GET COMPLETE. I THINK, YOU KNOW, ONE OF THE, THE CHALLENGES IN TERMS OF CONTEXT, AGAIN, IS AROUND LEADERSHIP. AND ONCE THE CITY MANAGER IS SELECTED, WHAT IS, YOU KNOW, MAKING SURE THAT THAT PERSON BUYS INTO THE VISION AS WELL, THAT THEY SEE THIS AS A PRIORITY SO THAT, YOU KNOW, THAT'S A DYNAMIC AS AS THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER MENTIONED, ENSURING THAT WE HIRE AND BUILD THE RIGHT TEAM AND CAPACITY. BUT WHAT I'VE BEEN DOING, BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, I THINK ONE OF THE REASONS THEY BROUGHT ME HERE IS I PRIDE MYSELF ON GETTING ACTIVE AND GETTING THINGS DONE IS YOU HAVE I'M WORKING ON ALL FRONTS.

    SO NOT ONLY AM I WORKING ON THE HOMEBUYER CLASS THAT WE DID LAST WEEK COORDINATING THAT, BUT I'M ALSO MEETING WITH DEVELOPERS AND SELLING EASTPOINT AND SAYING, HEY, CONSIDER EASTPOINT USING MY NETWORK FROM FROM MY CAREER AND INVITING THOSE FOLKS TO COME AND TOUR EASTPOINT. WE'VE HAD SOME GOOD DISCUSSIONS. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'RE AWARE THERE'S A NEW HOUSING DEVELOPMENT THAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN RIGHT HERE ON ON EASTPOINT STREET BETWEEN DORSEY AND THOMPSON HERE NEXT YEAR. AND SO I MET WITH THOSE DEVELOPERS AND SAID, HEY, DON'T STOP HERE. LET'S CONTINUE TO GROW IN OTHER SPACE. AND THEY HAPPEN TO HAVE SOME TAX CREDITS ALREADY EARMARKED FOR THEM. AND SO IT WAS INTERESTING TIMING TO BE SELLING ON SELLING THEM ON INVESTING IN EASTPOINT. SO MY PHILOSOPHY IS DIVE ALL IN, GO IN ALL IN ALL OF THEM TALK. I'VE MET WITH POLICE AND FIRE AND TALK WITH THEM ABOUT BEING HOMEOWNERS. SO UNTIL THE LARGER PICTURE IS CREATED WITH THE CITY MANAGER AND POLICY AND THOSE THINGS THAT YOU ALL HAVE TO DETERMINE, MY ROLE IS TO KEEP KEEP THINGS MOVING FORWARD TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY. SO THAT'S A LITTLE BIT ABOUT KIND

    [02:10:05]

    OF MY PHILOSOPHY WITH THINGS. SO THE TIMELINE AND THINGS WILL COME, BUT THOSE THINGS ARE PREDICATED UPON HAVING LEADERSHIP AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANIZATION THAT BUYS INTO IT, INTO THIS INVESTMENT IN TERMS OF HOUSING. THANK YOU. YOU MENTIONED NEW DEVELOPMENT ON DORSEY AND THOMPSON. WHAT KIND OF DEVELOPMENT? INITIAL QUESTION FOR YEAH, I CAN I CAN PULL UP WHY I DID THIS IN MY LAPTOP. BUT IT'S A MIXED INCOME HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND IT'S BEING DONE BY GORMAN. AND YEAH I DON'T KNOW PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MIGHT BE ABLE TO SPEAK MORE TO IT BECAUSE THIS WAS SOMETHING THAT'S COOKED BEFORE. BEFORE I GOT HERE. BUT THERE'S STILL SOME PHASES. THEY GOT TO GO THROUGH IN TERMS OF GETTING APPROVAL. STILL VARIANCES POTENTIALLY, AS WELL AS GETTING THIS DONE. SO. SO MY QUESTION IS HAS IT BEEN BEFORE COUNCIL OR ARE THEY STILL IN THE DEVELOPMENT PHASE. THANK YOU. LEE. COUNCIL MEMBER SHROPSHIRE WE JUST HAD AND THIS WAS PROBABLY ABOUT SIX MONTHS AGO. WE HAD A CONCEPT MEETING WITH THE DEVELOPER. AND THAT'S REALLY THE STAGE THAT IT'S AT RIGHT NOW. NOTHING HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. IT'S JUST A LOT OF TALK WITH ALL THE DEPARTMENTS TRYING TO GET A FEEL FOR THE REQUIREMENTS. BUT AS MR. WHITFIELD STATED, IT IS PROPOSED AS A MIXED USE TYPE DEVELOPMENT AND WHERE EXACTLY ON DORSEY AND WHAT WAS IT? WILL IT WILL STRETCH FROM DORSEY TO THOMPSON ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF EAST POINT STREET. OKAY. SO HERE IS THE CONCERNS. IT WAS JUST SHARED, BUT IT HASN'T BEEN SHARED WITH THE COMMUNITY. SO ANYTIME THERE'S POSSIBILITY OF DEVELOPMENT THAT'S COMING TO A NEIGHBORHOOD OR ANYBODY'S WARD, I WOULD THINK THAT YOU WOULD AT LEAST HAVE THAT CONVERSATION FIRST, BECAUSE WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN IS THE RESIDENTS ARE GOING TO WONDER NOW BECAUSE I'M STILL TRYING TO PICTURE WHAT END OF DORSEY AND THOMPSON, WHAT KIND OF DEVELOPMENT, WHAT KIND OF APARTMENTS, WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO LOOK LIKE? WHAT IS IT FOR THAT AREA? SO IT IS A RED FLAG. GOTCHA. YEAH. I MEAN, I'M SURE WE COULD EASILY GET WITH THE DEVELOPER AND PROVIDE YOU WITH A COPY OF THE CONCEPT, BUT NOTHING HAS BEEN ETCHED IN STONE AT THIS POINT. I MEAN, THIS IS MERELY A CONCEPT. THIS THIS IS A PART OF THE PLANNING PROCESS THEY HAVE TO BRING BEFORE US A CONCEPT, AND THEY WILL HAVE TO GO BEFORE THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THAT'S WITH ANY PLANS, WITH ANYTHING THAT THEY'RE DOING. THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. BECAUSE WHAT I DON'T WANT IS PUT OUT THERE THAT THIS IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING AND IT HASN'T GONE BEFORE THE NEIGHBORHOOD. YES, MA'AM. SO A COUPLE OF THINGS. AND PLEASE STAND BECAUSE I WANT TO MAKE SURE I'M, I'M SPEAKING CORRECTLY ON THIS. SO THE ZONING IS ALREADY IN PLACE FOR THIS SORT OF DEVELOPMENT. SO THERE WILL NOT BE A MY UNDERSTANDING OR A REQUEST FOR A REZONE FOR THIS PROPERTY. BUT I SAY ALL THAT TO SAY TO YOUR POINT, WE DON'T WANT TO PUT THE CART BEFORE THE HORSE. I WAS SHARING THAT JUST TO LET YOU KNOW, KIND OF MY APPROACH HAS BEEN GOING OUT THERE, AND I FOUND OUT ABOUT THIS PROJECT BECAUSE I WAS ENGAGING WITH DEVELOPERS ABOUT CONSIDERING EAST POINT, AND THE DEVELOPERS SAID, HEY, WE'RE ALREADY CONSIDERING EAST POINT. LET ME SHOW YOU A PROJECT THAT WE'RE WORKING ON. SO THAT'S THAT'S THE CONTEXT OF HOW THAT CAME TO BE. OKAY. AND, AND, AND, YOU KNOW, IT COULD BE ZONED FOR IT. BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY, YOU WOULD RATHER HAVE THAT CONVERSATION WITH THE COMMUNITY FIRST BEFORE IT'S JUST PUT OUT THAT, HEY, LOOK, THEY'RE LOOKING THIS IS WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO D, BECAUSE THE COMMUNITY WILL FEEL SLIGHTED OR SOME TYPE OF WAY WHEN A DEVELOPER COMES AND THERE WAS NO COMMUNICATION AND THEY KNEW NOTHING ABOUT IT. AND I CAN'T SPEAK IF THEY DID. AND THROUGH YOU, MADAM MAYOR TO COUNCIL, I CAN'T SPEAK ON IF THEY DID OR DIDN'T ENGAGE WITH COMMUNITY, THEY AND WE CAN MAKE SURE WE INVITE THEM TO COME SPEAK WITH YOU ALL. AND THEY WERE ALREADY TALKED TO THEM ABOUT COMING TO SPEAK WITH YOU

    [02:15:02]

    ALL, AND THEY ARE OPEN TO THAT, AND THEY MAY BE ABLE TO SHARE HOW THEY ENGAGE THAT SURROUNDING COMMUNITY. EVEN PRIOR TO ENGAGING AND EMBARKING ON THIS. SO I CAN'T SPEAK ON THAT. THEY MAY HAVE THAT INFORMATION. YEAH, I THINK MISS JESSIE, THE OPPORTUNITY HERE IS TO ENSURE THAT BEFORE STATEMENTS ARE MADE IN PRESENTATIONS BY STAFF ABOUT DEVELOPMENTS COMING TO THE AREA, THAT MAYOR AND COUNCIL KNOW ABOUT THEM, BECAUSE RESIDENTS WILL EXPECT US TO KNOW AND THEY WILL EXPECT THAT WE HAVE ALREADY AGREED OR MADE SOME DECISIONS. WE DON'T KNOW WHAT DECISIONS HAVE TO BE MADE. THEY DON'T NEED A REZONING. BUT ARE THEY LOOKING FOR ZONING CONDITIONS OR IS THERE A VARIANCE LIKE WHAT PROCESS IS IT GOING TO BE GOING THROUGH? AND SO I THINK WHEN IT COMES UP AND EVERYBODY UP HERE IS SURPRISED OR HADN'T HEARD ABOUT IT, YOU KNOW, EITHER ON SOCIAL MEDIA RIGHT NOW THEY THEY'RE PUTTING COMMENTS AS A PART OF THE MEETING OR ARE THEY GOING TO BE EMAILING OR DOING COMMENTS LATER. RIGHT. AND WITH THIS JUST BEING BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION, BECAUSE THERE IS NO ZONING APPLICATION, YOU SAID THEY'RE IN THE CONCEPT PHASE, SO THEY REACHED OUT TO THE OFFICE AND SHARED SOME INFORMATION. BUT SOMETIMES CONCEPTS DON'T MAKE IT PAST CONCEPTS. AND SO I THINK THAT'S THE OPPORTUNITY AS WE MOVE FORWARD, ESPECIALLY WHEN WE TALK ABOUT DEVELOPMENT, HOUSING DENSITY AND ALL OF THOSE THINGS. IT'S JUST THE LEVEL OF, YOU KNO, AT THIS POINT, WE DEFINITELY ALL THE INFORMATION BY TOMORROW ABOUT WHAT THIS IS BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO BE QUESTIONS ASKED. YES. AND IT'S TO PREVENT FREQUENT EMAILS OR MULTIPLE EMAILS. BLESS YOU ABOUT THE SAME INFORMATION. LIKE WE'RE GOING TO NEED TO KNOW THIS SO THAT WE CAN BE ABLE TO RESPOND TO THE COMMUNITY. BECAUSE I CAN IMAGINE, LIKE I SAID, IT'S EITHER A COMMENT ON THE VIDEO RIGHT NOW OR IT'LL COME UP LATER OR WE'LL SEE EMAILS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SO I THINK THAT'S THE. AS IT RELATES TO THIS ITEM, THERE IS EVERYBODY OKAY WITH THE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF THE GRANT APPLICATION, WHICH IS ATTACHED TO OUR AGENDA TONIGHT, GOING TO THE CONSENT AGENDA FOR THE MAJOR REPAIRS. NO OBJECTION. OKAY, MADAM DEPUTY CITY CLERK, YOU CAN PUT ITEM NUMBER 13 ON CONSENT. THANK YOU. SO MUCH. NEXT UP,

    [III.15. Council Discussion and Possible Action on the Facade Grant Program to be Funded by ARPA Funds in the Amount of $350,000 (Part 1 of 2)]

    MISS JESSIE, IS THE FACADE GRANT PROGRAM. I REALLY HOPE WE HAVE A LOT MORE DETAILS TONIGHT. YES, MA'AM. MACY ROGERS AND SHANNON GOLDEN ARE GOING TO COME UP AND SPEAK ON THAT.

    MADAM MAYOR, COUNCIL FINANCE IS HERE TONIGHT TO INFORM EVERYONE OF THE COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT AS IT RELATES TO THE ARPA FUNDS. ARPA FUNDS WERE WAS SELECTED FOR THIS PROGRAM. HOWEVER, WE ARE AT THE STAGE WHERE WE'RE ABOUT TO FINALLY FINALIZE OUR FUNDS TO BE OBLIGATED AND BE REPORTED ON. SO ARPA FUNDS HAVE TO BE OBLIGATED BY DECEMBER 31ST OF THIS YEAR. THIS I GUESS THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM WAS BROUGHT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL SOMETIME IN SEPTEMBER, AUGUST OR SEPTEMBER. AND SO AS IT RELATES TO THE OBLIGATION REQUIREMENT, IT HAS TO HAVE A CONTRACT. AND THAT CONTRACT HAS TO ALSO HAVE A DOLLAR AMOUNT ATTACHED TO IT. AS IT STANDS RIGHT NOW, I DON'T BELIEVE THIS PROGRAM HAS THAT FINANCE HAS RECOMMENDED TWO OPTIONS FROM RESEARCH IN REGARDS TO THESE ARPA FUNDS AND OBLIGATING THEM. AND TO MEET THE COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT. THE FIRST OPTION IS TO CREATE AN MOU. THIS CAN BE DONE BETWEEN THE CITY AND IDA. THE SECOND IS TO OPTION WOULD BE TO DETERMINE ANOTHER FUNDING SOURCE. WE CAN HAVE THAT MOU PREPARED AND READY MONDAY FOR MAYOR AND COUNCIL TO DISCUSS AND TAKE ACTION ON. I THINK THE CHALLENGE WITH DOING AN MOU WITH ANYBODY IS WE DON'T KNOW THE DETAILS OF THE PROGRAM. THAT'S WHY IT'S BEEN COMING BACK LIKE WE'VE TALKED ABOUT AND ALLOCATED $350,000, BUT $350,000 ISN'T GOING A LONG WAY IN FOUR WARDS.

    AND IF WE SEPARATE DOWNTOWN AS A SPECIFIC AREA, SO WHAT WE WERE SUPPOSED TO BE GETTING AND WHAT WE'VE BEEN WAITING ON IS WHAT IS A REALISTIC PLAN FOR THIS MONEY. I DON'T KNOW THAT WE NEED A

    [02:20:05]

    THIRD PARTY VENDOR TO MAKE IT HAPPEN. WE MY UNDERSTANDING IS IF THE FUNDS ARE ALLOCATED COMMITTED TO A PROJECT, THEN WE'RE FINE. AND THAT'S WHY WE MADE THE VOTE IN AUGUST OF SEPTEMBER TO SATISFY THAT REQUIREMENT. BUT WHAT WE DON'T HAVE IS A REALISTIC PLAN OR WHAT WE HAVEN'T HAD. LET ME SAY I'M NOT SURE WE'RE GOING TO GET TONIGHT, BUT A REALISTIC PLAN OF SPENDING $350,000 IN FOUR WARDS ALONE OR FOUR WARDS PLUS DOWNTOWN, WHICH WOULD BE FIVE DIFFERENT AREAS, AND WHAT ARE GOING TO BE THE CRITERIA AND HOW WE WORK THROUGH THAT. AND I THINK PREVIOUSLY WE HAD A PRESENTATION ABOUT THAT, BUT WE CAN'T OVERPROMISE AND UNDERDELIVER $350,000 IS NOT GOING THAT FAR. AND I THINK THE IT WAS LIKE UP TO $80,000. I MEAN, THAT'S LIKE FOUR GRAND OPPORTUNITIES. IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN. SO WE'VE BEEN WAITING ON THOSE DETAILS, BUT WE VOTED TO APPROVE THE FUNDING, THE ARPA FUNDING FOR THIS SO THAT IT CAN BE COMMITTED, ALLOCATED TO COMPLY WITH THE GRANT. BUT WE STILL NEED THE FUNDING. SO IT'S NOT ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT WE DO AN MOU WITH IDA, BECAUSE WE STILL DON'T HAVE THE INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE PROGRAM IS GOING TO BE OPERATED. THAT'S THE FIRST TIME WE'RE HEARING ABOUT THAT TONIGHT. WHAT WE'RE EXPECTING TONIGHT IS WHAT HOW WE'VE ALREADY APPROVED THE FUNDING.

    WE'VE ALREADY SAID THE STAFF CAN DO THIS PROGRAM. SO DOING AN MOU WITH VITAL WOULD BE A WHOLE NOTHER DECISION, WHICH WOULDN'T HAPPEN TONIGHT. IT COULD POTENTIALLY HAPPEN ON MONDAY.

    BUT THE QUESTION WOULD BE WHY ARE WE DOING THAT WHEN WE'VE ALREADY APPROVED FOR STAFF TO DO IT? AND WHAT WE'RE WAITING FOR IS A REALISTIC PLAN THAT GETS $350,000 THROUGHOUT THE CITY OR WHEREVER WE IF WE'RE GOING TO JUST FOCUS ON DOWNTOWN BUSINESS OR WHATEVER THAT PLAN IS GOING TO BE THAT HAS BEEN THE CONCERN OF COUNCIL, OF HOW WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A FAIR, OPEN PROCESS TO ACTUALLY DO THE PROGRAM. BUT WE'VE ALREADY COMMITTED THE FUNDS. WE'VE ALREADY SAID THAT WE'RE GOING TO DO IT. WE JUST NEED THE DETAILS OF THE PROGRAM. RIGHT. BUT I JUST NEEDED TO ADD TO THAT. EVEN THOUGH COUNCIL APPROVES THE FUNDING, IT HAS, IT HAS TO HAVE A CAVEAT TO WHERE THE CONTRACT HAS TO BE. THE FUNDS HAVE TO BE OBLIGATED TO A CONTRACT, AND THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE SAYING THROUGH THIS IS THIS IS THE FIRST TIME YOU ALL ARE TELLING US THAT, FIRST OF ALL, YEAH, VERY FIRST TIME, BECAUSE BEFORE IT WAS JUST THE PROGRAM THROUGH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, AND WE WERE WAITING ON DETAILS. AND SO THIS AGAIN, WE'RE PUTTING COUNCIL IN A POSITION TO HAVE TO MAKE A DECISION AT THE FINAL HOUR ABOUT SOMETHING THAT ONE WE WERE NEVER TOLD ABOUT THERE HAVING TO BE A CONTRACT WITH THE AGENCY OR WITH SOMEBODY TO OBLIGATE THE FUNDS. WE WERE JUST TOLD WE NEEDED TO APPROVE THE PROGRAM AND NOT OBLIGATED THE FUNDS, AND NOW WE'RE TALKING ABOUT VITAL, BUT WE STILL IT'S NOT WHO WE HAVE TO CONTRACT WHO IF WE'RE GOING TO CONTRACT WITH SOMEBODY, WE SET THE TERMS OF WHAT IT'S GOING TO BE. WE'RE NOT GOING TO TURN $350,000 OVER TO AN ENTITY WITHOUT ANY INPUT ON THAT. AND SO I'M HOPEFUL THAT TONIGHT WE HAVE AN UPDATE. WE HAVE SOME INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT THIS PROGRAM IS GOING TO BE, WHAT THE QUALIFICATIONS ARE GOING TO BE, HOW WE'RE GOING TO DO IT. BECAUSE THE COUNCIL WILL DECIDE IF THERE IS A CONTRACT, HOW THAT MONEY WILL BE SPENT, NOT THE OTHER AGENCIES. I WAS JUST SPEAKING ON THE FUNDING PART OF IT, BUT MAESHOWE IS THE PROGRAM HAS THE PROGRAMMATIC PIECE ON IT. AND GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL MACY ROGERS, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT I TRULY APOLOGIZE. THE PRESENTATION IS NOT UPLOADED TO THE SYSTEM. SO IF YOU HAVE IT ON A FLASH DRIVE, DO YOU HAVE YOUR LAPTOP? I, I, I HAVE A FLASH DRIVE AT MY, MY DESK. I CAN GO GET IT REAL QUICKLY AND BE RIGHT BACK. WE'LL, WE'LL PASS THIS ITEM AND GO TO A VERY GOOD THANK YOU. READY. NEXT ONE. NUMBER 16 IS ON THE CONSENT. LET'S GO TO NUMBER 17. THIS LAST

    [IV.17. Discussion and Possible Action on GIRMA PTSD Insurance Program (Action May be Taken)]

    MONTH I MEANT LAST WEEK. THIS IS MANDATORY INSURANCE PROGRAM THAT WE HAVE TO PUT IN PLACE FOR PTSD. AND FOR WHAT I THINK IS STANDS FOR POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER FOR GAMA. I THINK THIS IS FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. THE AMOUNT WAS AROUND 33,000. THERE WAS I THINK WE APPROVED THE AMOUNT. BUT WE NEED TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION AND IT'S TIME SENSITIVE. AND SO I'LL TURN IT OVER TO MISS JESSIE AND OUR CITY ATTORNEY. MADAM MAYOR, MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, YOU APPROVE THE PAYMENT OF THE INSURANCE FOR FIRST RESPONDERS, PTSD INSURANCE PROGRAM LAST MEETING. BUT

    [02:25:02]

    THERE'S ALSO A RESOLUTION THAT YOU ASK THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TO PUT IN THE PROPER FORM FOR ADOPTION THAT INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO YOU. AND SO WE ARE REQUESTING APPROVAL OF THAT RESOLUTION. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? IF NOT, BECAUSE IT INDICATES ON THE AGENDA THAT ACTION MAY BE TAKEN, WE CAN THERE CAN BE A MOTION TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION TO ADD MEMBERSHIP IN A FUND OF GEORGIA INTERLOCAL RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY.

    IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS TO ASK FROM STAFF, TONIGHT IS THAT WE APPROVE THE RESOLUTION. WE'VE ALREADY APPROVED THE AMOUNT AND THE RESOLUTION. THE MOTION WILL BE A RESOLUTION TO ADD MEMBERSHIP AND A FUND OF GEORGIA INTERLOCAL RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY. GIRMA, WHICH IS THE TITLE OF THE RESOLUTION. COUNCIL MEMBER BUTLER. MADAM, MAY I MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE RESOLUTION TO ADD THE MEMBERSHIP FOR RICH MEN? RISK MANAGEMENT RESOLUTION SO. IT DOES DEAL WITH RISK MANAGEMENT. BUT DO WE NEED TO BE SPECIFIC ABOUT THE TITLE OR IS THAT OKAY. ATTORNEY WIGGINS YEAH, IF YOU WOULD JUST READ THE TITLE OF THE RESOLUTION I THINK THAT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE. I DON'T HAVE THAT IN FRONT OF ME. SO THE RESOLUTION, THE TITLE IS THE RESOLUTION TO ADD MEMBERSHIP AND A FUND OF GEORGIA INTERLOCAL RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY. SO MOVED. IS THERE A SECOND SECOND MOVED IN PROPERLY SECONDED. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIES. NEXT UP, COUNCIL MEMBER MARTIN ROGERS. NEXT GEN

    [IV.18. The Next GEN Internship Program Initiative]

    INTERNSHIP PROGRAM. YES. AND I HAVE PROVIDED A COUPLE OF PIECES OF INFORMATION HERE. THIS ISN'T ANYTHING DIFFERENT THAT THE CITY HAS ALREADY DONE APPROXIMATELY EIGHT YEARS AGO, WE WERE ABLE TO PARTNER WITH ATLANTA METROPOLITAN COLLEGE IN ORDER TO PROVIDE THOSE STUDENTS WITH AN INTERNSHIP EXPERIENCE HERE IN THE CITY TO GO TOWARDS THEIR DEGREE PROGRAM. I'M STILL IN THE PROCESS OF NOT ONLY SPEAKING WITH ATLANTA METROPOLITAN COLLEGE, BUT ALSO COLLEGES IN THE ATLANTA UNIVERSITY CENTER AND ALSO CLAYTON STATE UNIVERSITY. TO CONTINUE OR REENACT THIS INTERNSHIP PROGRAM THROUGH THE CITY OF EASTPOINTE, PAID AND NON-PAID INTERNSHIPS.

    THIS PARTICULAR DOCUMENT THAT I HAVE HERE WILL JUST COINCIDE WITH WHAT THE CITY IS ALREADY DOING FOR AN INTERNSHIP PROGRAM, BUT IT'S MORE STREAMLINED AND VALUABLE TO WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE STUDENTS RECEIVE AS THEY ENTER THE INTERNSHIP PROGRAM HERE IN THE CITY. I DO HAVE. THE INTERNSHIP PROGRAM WOULD START AT THE END OF MAY, GOING INTO ONLY THE MONTHS OF JUNE AND JULY. THEY CAN IN TURN IN VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF EASTPOINTE. BUT INTERNSHIPS ARE A VALUABLE WAY TO GROW OUR PIPELINE OF INCOMING GRADUATING TALENT. THE CITY CAN ASSESS THEIR ABILITIES AND ENCOURAGE INTERNS TO APPLY FOR OPEN POSITIONS. I'VE ALSO CREATED A TIMELINE HERE TO BE INSTITUTED. AGAIN, THIS DOCUMENT WILL GO ALONG OR COINCIDE WITH WHAT IS ALREADY BEING DONE IN THE CITY OF EASTPOINTE. SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE THIS DOCUMENT A PART OF THE CITY'S INTERNSHIP PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT A NEXT GEN INTERNSHIP PROGRAM. IF YOU LOOK AT PAGE NUMBER TWO, I PROVIDED AN INTERNSHIP SUMMER SCHEDULE ORIENTATION. STUDENTS SHOULD RECEIVE WEEKLY LECTURES NOT TO. EXCEED 45 MINUTES AND A BREAKDOWN FROM START TO FINISH FROM THE MONTH OF JANUARY UNTIL THE END OF JULY, WHEN THE INTERNSHIP PROGRAM SHOULD END.

    THE GOALS OF THE INTERNSHIP ARE TO DEVELOP PROFESSIONAL SKILLS AND INCREASE EMPLOYABILITY IN TARGETED INDUSTRIES. CONNECT INTERNS WITH POTENTIAL JOBS IN THE CITY. INCREASE THE NUMBER OF JOB OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOCAL YOUTH AND DEVELOP KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE CITY OF EASTPOINTE AND

    [02:30:04]

    ITS OPERATIONS, AND INCREASE AWARENESS AND ENGAGEMENT WITH THE LOCAL COMMUNITY. DEVELOP A DEEPER UNDERSTANDING OF COMMUNITY ISSUES AND PROVIDE BE PROVIDED WITH THE HANDS ON LEARNING EXPERIENCE FOR INTERNS. SO THAT IS WHY I HAVE PROVIDED THIS DOCUMENT TONIGHT FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ALSO SOME OF THE QUALIFICATIONS IN THE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES THAT THE INTERNSHIP OR THE INTERN WILL BE PROVIDED BY COMING HERE INTO THE GREAT CITY OF EASTPOINTE. THANK YOU. I KNOW YOU'RE NOT EXPECTING ACTION TONIGHT OR MONDAY. NO, I'M NOT EXPECTING ACTION TONIGHT. I MEAN, IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES OR ANYTHING THAT NEED TO BE MADE, THE CITY OF EASTPOINTE ALREADY HAS AN INTERNSHIP PROGRAM. IT'S ONE THAT IS PAID AND IT'S ONE THAT IS NOT PAID. BUT WHEN YOU TAKE A DEEPER DIVE INTO WHAT IT IS WE'RE OFFERING, I THINK THIS GIVES A BETTER SCOPE OF WHAT IT IS WE ARE OFFERING OR WHAT WE SHOULD BE OFFERING AS WE ARE OFFERING INTERNS. WHEN I STARTED THE INTERNSHIP OR WHEN I INITIATED THE INTERNSHIP PROGRAM ONLY WITH ATLANTA METROPOLITAN EIGHT YEARS AGO, THERE HAVE BEEN QUITE A FEW CHANGES. SO I WOULD LIKE FOR US TO EXPAND OUR REACH WITH STUDENTS IN THE ATLANTA UNIVERSITY CENTER AND ALSO AT CLAYTON STATE UNIVERSITY. SO IT'S NO ACTION ON IT. I WOULD JUST LIKE THIS DOCUMENT TO BE PROVIDED OR THIS DOCUMENT TO BE A PART OF OUR RECORDS WITH WHAT THE POSSIBILITIES ARE FOR OFFERING STUDENTS THESE INTERNSHIPS THAT COME INTO OUR CITY MORE STREAMLINED AS TO WHAT THE POSSIBILITIES WILL BE AS AN INTERNSHIP IN THE CITY OF EASTPOINTE, COUNCILMEMBER. YES.

    THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER MARTIN ROGERS I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PROGRAM. YOU TALKED ABOUT PARTNERING WITH THE ATLANTA TECHNICAL COLLEGE, ATLANTA METROPOLITAN COLLEGE, CLAYTON STATE, AND THE ATLANTA UNIVERSITY CENTER. WOULD WE PARTNER WITH THEM AND SPECIFICALLY LOOK FOR EASTPOINTE RESIDENTS WHO ARE ENROLLED IN THOSE INSTITUTIONS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PROGRAM? COULD YOU REPEAT YOUR QUESTION? I'M SORRY SO AS NOT TO ENGAGE IN A Q&A. IF YOU COULD WRITE DOWN THE QUESTIONS THAT COUNCIL MEMBER ATKINS HAS AND THEN THERE THERE ARE TWO OTHER PEOPLE, AND THEN I'LL COME BACK TO HER. SO JUST ASK IF YOU COULD ASK HER THE QUESTIONS, AND THEN WE'LL GO TO OTHERS AND THEN SHE CAN. SURE. I JUST WANTED TO KNOW PARTNERING WITH THOSE INSTITUTIONS THAT YOU MENTIONED, ATLANTA TECHNICAL COLLEGE, ATLANTA METROPOLITAN COLLEGE, AUC, AND CLAYTON STATE COLLEGE, WILL WE PARTNER WITH THOSE INSTITUTIONS AND SPECIFICALLY ENGAGE EAST POINT RESIDENTS WHO ARE ENROLLED IN THOSE INSTITUTIONS? AND BECAUSE I ASKED THAT QUESTION JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE BENEFITING EAST POINT RESIDENTS. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. THAT'S IT. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER MITCHELL. THANK YOU. I WAS JUST CURIOUS. I HEARD YOU SAY SOME OF THESE ARE FUNDED OR PAID INTERNSHIPS, SO I WAS JUST CURIOUS AS TO HOW THAT WOULD BE FUNDED. AND WHERE DID THAT MONEY COME FROM? ALSO, TO MISS JESSE REALLY QUICK, I WASN'T AWARE WE HAVE INTERNSHIP PROGRAMS. OKAY.

    ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER BUTLER. YES, MA'AM. MADAM MAYOR, MY QUESTION FOR COUNCILWOMAN DOCTOR MARTIN ROGERS IS YOU MENTIONED SOMETHING ABOUT THE CURRICULUM.

    SO WOULD THAT BE FORMATTED BY THE COLLEGES? AND BECAUSE I THINK YOU SAID THERE WAS A AMOUNT OF TIME FOR STUDY, I THINK IT WAS 45 MINUTES A WEEK OR. I'M I'M JUST TRYING TO CATCH THAT. SO IF YOU COULD HELP ME WITH THAT QUESTION, I APPRECIATE IT. COUNCILMEMBER ROGERS, ALL RIGHT. AND THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR QUESTIONS TO GO TO. COUNCIL MEMBER ATKINS. YES. IN THE PAST, BEFORE WHEN THIS INTERNSHIP PROGRAM STARTED WITH ATLANTA METROPOLITAN COLLEGE, WE SPECIFICALLY GAVE PRIORITY. MY GOAL WAS TO GIVE PRIORITY TO EAST POINT STUDENTS. AND THEN IF WE WEREN'T ABLE TO FIND EAST POINT STUDENTS THAT WERE ATTENDING ATLANTA METROPOLITAN COLLEGE, THEN WE MOVED ON TO WHOEVER WAS INTERESTED IN THE INTERNSHIP PROGRAM. BUT WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT IS TWOFOLD. YOU CAN COME. I WOULD LIKE FOR YOU CAN COME INTO OUR CITY OF EAST POINT AND RECEIVE COLLEGE CREDIT, BUT THERE'S ALSO AN ADDITIONAL PROGRAM HERE IN THE CITY OF EAST POINT WHERE YOU ARE PAID TO HAVE AN INTERNSHIP HERE AS WELL. I DID NOT I HAVEN'T HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO GO OVER TO ATLANTA TECHNICAL COLLEGE, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS WITH THE

    [02:35:06]

    PRESIDENT AT ATLANTA TECHNICAL COLLEGE HOW DO WE GET EDUCATIONAL CREDITS FOR OUR POLICE AND FIRE OFFICERS? BECAUSE IT IS A TECHNICAL INSTITUTION AND NOT A FOUR YEAR INSTITUTION. SO I WANTED TO TAKE A DEEPER DIVE WITH WHAT THEIR COURSE OFFERINGS ARE AND HOW THAT COULD BENEFIT EITHER THE EMPLOYEES IN EAST POINT, OR WOULD IT BENEFIT THE STUDENTS AT ATLANTA TECHNICAL COLLEGE, VICE VERSA? BUT I JUST HAVEN'T HAD TIME TO REACH OUT TO ATLANTA TECHNICAL COLLEGE. BUT WHEN IT FIRST STARTED, IT WAS JUST SOLELY ATLANTA METROPOLITAN COLLEGE. BUT NOW THERE IS A GREATER NEED. WE HAVE THESE INSTITUTIONS AND THESE STUDENTS THAT, YOU KNOW, THERE ARE QUITE A FEW STUDENTS THAT ARE ATTENDING CLAYTON STATE, RIGHT NOW THAT ARE EAST POINT RESIDENTS. SO TOP PRIORITY WOULD GO TO THOSE STUDENTS THAT RESIDE IN EAST POINT FUNDING. THAT IS SOMETHING THAT I'M STILL DISCUSSING WITH OUR INTERIM CITY MANAGER, BUT I THOUGHT THERE MIGHT HAVE BEEN A LINE ITEM IN EACH CITY'S DEPARTMENT ALREADY FOR INTERNSHIPS, BUT I HAVEN'T HAD I HAVEN'T TAKEN THAT DEEPER DIVE YET WITH MISS JESSE. AND WAS THERE ANOTHER QUESTION COUNCIL MEMBER BUTLER OH, SO AS I WAS LOOKING AT INTERNSHIP PROGRAMS AND WHAT OTHER CITIES WERE DOING, THEY OFFERED 45 MINUTE WEEKLY SESSIONS TO THE INTERNS BY DEPARTMENT HEADS. SO ONE OF THE IF YOU LOOK ON PAGE, THEY JUST OFFERED 45 MINUTE COURSE OFFERINGS AS TO ONE OF THE COURSE OFFERINGS, LET'S SAY UNDERSTANDING JOB MARKET AND RESUMES, THAT WOULD BE A PRESENTATION MADE BY OUR HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. SO WHAT I DID WAS INCORPORATE THE DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS TO PROBABLY COME IN AND GIVE THOSE INTERN STUDENTS A BRIEF PRESENTATION ON JOB MARKET SKILLS, LEADERSHIP FUNDAMENTALS, BUSINESS ETIQUETTE, AND PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION. JUST PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL LAYER THAT COMES ALONG WITH ANY JOB IN ANY INDUSTRY. YOU HAVE SOME SORT OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, SO IT'S TECHNICALLY NOT A CURRICULUM. I WOULD SAY THAT WOULD BE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ADDED TO THEM COMING INTO WORK AND RECEIVING PAY. JUST A REAL HANDS ON ON THE JOB EXPERIENCE. COUNCILMAN. THANK YOU. I KNOW WE'VE BEEN DOING INTERNS FOR QUITE SOME TIME AND I BUT I DON'T WANT IS FOR US TO GET REALLY, REALLY DEEP INTO TH. TELLING THEM OR PROVIDING TO THEM ABOUT RESUMES AND WHAT THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO. HOW IT'S SUPPOSED TO WRITE, HOW THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO DRESS. THAT'S PART OF THEM GOING TO SCHOOL. WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT INTERNSHIP, YOU'RE THINKING ABOUT COMING HERE LIKE, IF YOU ARE GOING TO SCHOOL TO BE AN ATTORNEY, YOU'RE GOING TO GO AND DO AN INTERNSHIP IN A LAW OFFICE. AND THEY'RE GOING TO GO OVER THINGS OR SHARE THINGS AS TO WHAT IT IS TO PUT A CASE TOGETHER, HEAR A CASE, DO A CASE, THINGS LIKE THAT. WHAT I DON'T WHAT I WOULD PREFER IF THE CITY ATTORNEY POSSIBLY LOOK AT IT, OR TO SEE WHAT CAN BE ADDED, WHAT CAN BE TAKEN OUT, HOW WILL IT WORK WITH THE CITY? BECAUSE WHAT I DON'T WANT IS FOR STAFF TO BE TAKEN AWAY FROM MORE TIME, HAVING TO DO LECTURES OR OR STUFF LIKE THAT, THAT THAT'S JUST THE WAY THAT I SEE IT. I MEAN, HOWEVER IT WORKS, WHATEVER THE WISHES OF COUNCIL, I'M FINE, BUT I JUST DON'T WANT OUR STAFF TO HAVE TO GIVE THEM WEEKLY LECTURES ABOUT WHAT IT IS THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE DOING, BECAUSE WHEN YOU'RE DOING AN INTERNSHIP, YOU'RE COMING TO LEARN WHAT YOU'RE ACTUALLY GOING TO TAKE A TRADE OR STUDY IN AS FAR AS CLASSES FOR THE POLICE, WE PROVIDE TRAINING AND THEY ACTUALLY GET THEIR PAY BASED ON THEIR TRAINING. STAFF ALSO

    [02:40:03]

    PROVIDES GET TRAINING THAT THE CITY. I'M SURE PAYS FOR THAT THEY CAN DO AS WELL. SO THAT'S JUST MY TAKE ON IT. OKAY. COUNCILMAN MARTIN ROGERS, THANK YOU. AND. WHEN YOU'RE PROVIDED AN INTERNSHIP, I THINK THAT IT'S GOOD TO TAKE A HOLISTIC APPROAC. I UNDERSTAND WHAT IT IS THAT YOU ARE SAYING, BUT IT'S A DIFFERENCE IN COMING INTO A CITY AND JUST DOING A JOB. LIKE WHAT IS IT THAT YOU'RE GATHERING THESE THESE INFORMATION SESSIONS DON'T HAVE TO BE 45 OR 60 MINUTES. THIS IS JUST SOMETHING THAT, AS I LOOKED AT OTHER INTERNSHIP PROGRAMS AND OTHER CITIES, THE CITY OF ATLANTA, THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, ALL OF THE EMPLOYEES OR MAYBE A SPECIFIC PROGRAM EMPLOYEE IS DESIGNATED TO PROVIDE SOME SORT OF ADDITIONAL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND NOT NECESSARILY IT'S STATED HERE THAT IT'S A WEEKLY LECTURE, BUT IT'S PRETTY MUCH AN INFORMATION SESSION. UNDERSTANDING JOB MARKET AND RESUMES SOME OF THE COURSE OFFERINGS THAT NOT COURSE OFFERINGS, BUT INFORMATIONAL SESSIONS THAT THEY OFFER WAS LEADERSHIP AND TEAM BUILDING SKILLS, BUSINESS ETIQUETTE, AND PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION.

    LEADERSHIP FUNDAMENTALS. IT ALSO SAYS HERE THAT THE INTERNSHIPS, THE INTERNS SHOULD BE ABLE OR BE PROVIDED THE OPPORTUNITY TO COME TO A CITY COUNCIL MEETING. SO PRIOR TO LIKE SUBMITTING THIS OR BRINGING THIS BEFORE A COUNCIL, I LOOKED AT SEVERAL INTERNSHIP PROGRAMS AND WHAT OTHER CITIES WERE DOING, AND I JUST WANT US TO HAVE IF WE ARE ALLOWING STUDENTS TO COME INTO OUR CITY, THAT THE PROGRAM IS BENEFICIAL ON ALL FRONTS. SO NO, THEY DON'T HAVE TO HAVE A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OR INFORMATIONAL SESSION, BUT I WOULD JUST PREFER THAT THIS BE THE BEST OPPORTUNITY POSSIBLE TO THOSE STUDENTS. I'M GOING TO GO TO COUNCIL MEMBER MITCHELL, AND THEN I'M GOING TO MAKE SOME REMARKS. AND THEN MISS JESSE. I MEAN, YOU'VE BEEN OUR HR DIRECTOR FOR QUITE SOME TIME, AND I KNOW WE'VE RUN INTERNSHIP PROGRAMS ANNUALLY. WE'VE INCLUDED GEORGIA TECH, GEORGIA STATE, I KNOW COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS HAD MENTIONED LAST YEAR A PROGRAM YOUTH INTERNS FOR OUR YOUTH. AND WE TALKED ABOUT THAT BEING A PART OF WHAT WE WERE ALREADY DOING AND GETTING FUNDING FROM FULTON COUNTY YOUTH WORKFORCE WIOA OFFICE, WORKFORCE INNOVATION, BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE THE FUNDING COMES DOWN FOR THIS. I DID JUST DO A QUICK SCAN OF THE QUICK, YOU KNOW, CONTROL OF SOME OF THE BUDGET FOR INTERN. I DIDN'T NECESSARILY SEE THOSE LINE ITEMS. SO BACK TO THE QUESTION AROUND FUNDING, HOW WE FUNDED IN THE PAST, HOW WE FUNDED IT NOW. BUT I KNOW LAST YEAR WE WERE TALKING ABOUT ADDING AND REALLY REACHING OUT TO FULTON COUNTY AROUND THE SUMMER. YOUTH EMPLOYMENT COUNCIL MEMBER CUMMINGS BROUGHT THAT UP.

    SO COUNCIL MEMBER MITCHELL AND THEN MISS JESSE, I WAS JUST GOING TO ADD, I DO THINK THIS IS A GREAT IDEA. HOWEVER, I THINK I REMEMBER MY SUMMER INTERNSHIP, SO I ACTUALLY GOT COLLEGE CREDITS FOR THIS. I'M NOT SURE IF THEY GET IN COLLEGE CREDITS, BUT I KNOW BEING AN UNDERGRAD, YOU HAVE SO MANY. YOU KNOW, I GOT THE PROBABLY THE BEST EXPERIENCES, YOU KNOW, DOING MY SUMMER INTERNSHIPS. SO I THINK IF WE CAN MAKE THAT A PIECE OF IT TO MAKE SURE THEY BENEFIT IN MORE THAN ONE WAY AND YEAH, IF IT COULD BE ACCREDITED, I THINK THAT WOULD BE AWESOME. THANKS, MISS JESSE. I'LL TURN IT. I SAID I WAS GOING TO MAKE STATEMENTS AND THEN I MADE THEM AND SO I BASICALLY, MADAM MAYOR, MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, WE CERTAINLY WELCOME ANY AND ALL IDEAS ABOUT HOW WE CAN IMPROVE OUR INTERNSHIP OFFERINGS. AND YES, WE DO HAVE INTERNSHIPS THAT ARE FOR COLLEGE CREDITS ONLY. WE HAVE PAID AND WE HAVE NON PAID. SO AND IT DEPENDS ON THE SCHOOL REQUIREMENTS. SOMETIMES THEY HAVE TO DO AN INTERNSHIP IN ORDER TO GRADUATE. SO WHAT WE GENERALLY DO IS TO WE'VE HAD HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS AND THOSE HONESTLY ARE IN MY OPINION THE

    [02:45:01]

    MOST MEANINGFUL BECAUSE THOSE YOUNG PEOPLE ARE BEING INTRODUCED TO THE WORLD OF WORK AND THEY REALLY LATCH ON TO IT AND THEY LOVE IT. A COUPLE OF THE PROGRAMS WE'VE HAD, WE'VE IDENTIFIED STUDENTS WHO WERE HAD ASPIRATIONS TO BE ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS, YOU NAME IT, AND THEY WERE WELL ON THEIR WAY IN THEIR FUTURE FIELD OF STUDY. HAD THEY HAD RESEARCHED COLLEGES WHERE THEY WANTED TO GO, ETCETERA, AND SO WE WOULD WELCOME ANY OPPORTUNITY FOR ANY AND ALL OF THOSE KINDS OF INTERNSHIPS PAID NON-PAID COLLEGE CREDIT, SUMMER EMPLOYMENT, INTERNSHIPS. WE'LL MAKE IT WORK. AND. THANK YOU. SO THERE'S SOME TIME BUILT IN. MISS JESSE, I THINK YOU KNOW, AS WE THINK ABOUT SUMMER OR BECAUSE THIS KIND OF STARTS FOR THIS LOOKS LIKE A TIMELINE. MORE SO FOR SUMMER. IT'S ASSESSING FEBRUARY THROUGH MARCH. SO LIKE THE COMPREHENSIVE INTERNSHIP PROGRAM, CONSIDERING THE YOUTH EMPLOYMENT, WE OWE A FUNDS LINE ITEMS THAT WE'VE ALREADY BUDGETED, COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES THAT WE MIGHT WORK WITH. I THINK THE IT DEPARTMENT IS WORKING WITH GEORGIA TECH. BEFORE I KNOW WE WORK WITH GEORGIA STATE, WE ARE THERE ARE A NUMBER OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN THE AREA. RIGHT. AND SO YOU THINK IT WOULD BE GOOD FOR US TO HAVE THIS DISCUSSION AT THE JANUARY WORK SESSION LIKE THE LIKE EAST POINTS INTERNSHIP PROGRAM, WHETHER I MEAN, THESE ALSO CAN GO YEAR ROUND, RIGHT? KIDS ARE IN SCHOOL. YES, MA'AM. FOR DIFFERENT SEMESTERS AND STUFF LIKE THAT. SO IT'S LIKE THE COMPREHENSIVE WHICH INCLUDES SUMMER. WAS THAT SOMETHING YOU COULD SHARE WITH US AT THE JANUARY WORK SESSION OR WOULD YOU PREFER FEBRUARY WORK SESSION? I THINK JANUARY, BECAUSE A LOT OF STUDENTS ARE LOOKING FOR THEIR INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITIES IN JANUARY, SCHOOLS LET OUT, I THINK IN MAY. SO ONCE YOU GET PAST THE FIRST PART OF MAY, THEY'RE ENGAGED IN FINALS AND SO FORTH, SO WE CAN BRING SOMETHING BACK IN JANUARY. SO IF WE COULD PUT ON THE JANUARY WORK SESSION, EAST POINT, THE CITY OF EAST POINT, INTERNSHIP PROGRAMS. OH, COUNCILMAN BUTLER, THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. I THINK THIS IS A GREAT PROGRAM TO I THINK THE SOLUTION BETWEEN SOME OF THOSE CONCERNS, MAYBE THERE'S A NONPROFIT BECAUSE WHEN I WAS IN HIGH SCHOOL, I CAN'T REMEMBER THE NAME OF THE NONPROFIT, BUT IT GAVE US THAT SCHOOLING THAT YOU MENTIONED ON THE WEEKENDS. ALSO, EVEN TO THE POINT WHERE IT TAUGHT YOU WHICH FORK TO EAT WITH AND ALL OF THOSE TYPE OF ETIQUETTE PROGRAMS. YES, BUT SO WHAT TO WHERE? HOW TO GET YOUR RESUME? WHAT SUIT ARE YOU SUPPOSED TO WEAR? ALL OF THOSE THINGS TO GO ALONG WITH THAT. SO WE MAY BE ABLE TO PARTNER WITH THE NONPROFIT TO DO THAT. ALRIGHTY. JANUARY WORK SESSION.

    WORK SESSION. CAN'T TALK. CITY OF EAST POINT INTERNSHIP PROGRAMS AND COUNCIL MEMBER CUMMINS. I DON'T KNOW IF THEY ALREADY HAVE THE INFORMATION FROM LAST YEAR FOR SUMMER YOUTH, BUT LIKE IF WE CAN KIND OF HAVE ALL OF THAT AS A PART OF THOSE DISCUSSIONS. ALRIGHTY. I THINK 20 AND 21 ARE GOING TO BE QUICK, AND THEN WE'LL GO BACK TO 17. THIS IS 20 IS PURCHASE A POLICE

    [IV.20. Council Discussion and Possible Action on the Purchase of Police Department Patrol Vehicles Under STATE CONTRACT for a Five-Year Lease from Ford Credit for $863,471.86]

    DEPARTMENT, PATROL VEHICLES UNDER STATE CONTRACT. IT'S $863,000, $471.86. IF WE PUT IT ON CONSENT. I'M FINE WITH THAT. I JUST THINK WE NEED TO HAVE A DISCUSSION ABOUT. THIS IS ALMOST $1 MILLION ON THIS ITEM. WE CAN EITHER DO IT TONIGHT OR IF YOU ALL WANT TO DO IT AT MONDAY'S MEETING, THEN IT WOULDN'T GO ON THE CONSENT. IT WOULD GO ON THE AGENDA. MAJOR COPELAND, I SAW YOU KIND OF MOVING THIS WAY. WOULD YOU PREFER TO TALK ABOUT IT TONIGHT OR MONDAY? IF YOU'RE READY, WE CAN DO IT TONIGHT. YE. YES, MADAM MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS. SO THE REASON WE'RE

    [02:50:05]

    DOING THIS IS, IS TO REPLACE CARS THAT'S BEEN WRECKED OR EITHER WEAR AND TEAR. PLUS, WE GOT NEW OFFICERS THAT WE CONTINUE TO HIRE. AND THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE THREE VEHICLES THAT WAS WRECKED ON 285. AND IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN, CHIEF WENT OVER THE NUMBERS WITH SHANNON. AND I THINK WE ALSO USED CONDEMNED FUNDS FOR THE INITIAL PAYMENT, WHICH IS DRUG MONEY. HOW MANY VEHICLES? YES, MADAM MAYOR, THIS WAS PART OF THE BUDGET AMENDMENT IS FOR TEN VEHICLES TO BE FUNDED WITH CONDEMNED FUNDS, CONFISCATED FUNDS FOR THE LEASE VEHICLES, CONFISCATED FUNDS. SO THAT'S A REVENUE SOURCE GENERATED THROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, NOT FROM THE GENERAL FUND. CORRECT. COUNCILMEMBER MITCHELL I KNOW THAT WAS THAT WAS MY QUESTION.

    SO GREAT WORK GUYS. I FOUND A NEW FUNDING SOURCE, SO I'LL KEEP IT UP. YEAH, ALMOST $1 MILLION.

    KEEP LOOKING, KEEP LOOKING. ALRIGHT. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY OBJECTION THIS GOING ON CONSENT.

    [IV.21. Council Discussion and Possible Action on the Legal Department Renovations]

    ALRIGHT. LEGAL DEPARTMENT RENOVATION. THIS DOES INDICATE ACTION MAY BE TAKEN. IT SEEMS THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY. THANK YOU. MAJOR. THE CITY ATTORNEY MAY NEED SOME ACTION TONIGHT.

    ATTORNEY WIGGINS. THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. SO JUST A QUICK HISTORY. THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF ALYSSA EDMONDS, DID LOOK INTO DOING SOME RENOVATIONS OVER THERE. WE REACHED OUT TO FINANCE WHO INCLUDED US IN THE BUDGET FOR SOME CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. WITH THAT, WE HAVE SOUGHT TO DO A STATE CONTRACT WITH. I THINK IT'S SOURCEWELL AND THE CONTRACTOR IS ROUGH ORDER MAGNITUDE. I BELIEVE THAT HAS BEEN INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKET. IF IT HASN'T, I CAN CERTAINLY EMAIL IT, BUT IT IS TO DO SOME RENOVATIONS WHICH INCLUDE THE BATHROOM. IT ALSO INCLUDES THE CARPET, SOME PAINTING. SEE WHAT ELSE. AND THE PAINTING WOULD INCLUDE THE INTERIOR WALLS, DOORS AND DOOR FRAMES. IF YOU HAVE NOT BEEN OVER TO THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT AS YOU KNOW IT IS IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SLASH COURTHOUSE, SLASH JAIL AND THE SUITE THAT WE OCCUPY USED TO BE FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. AND SO THERE ARE A NUMBER OF REMNANTS OF IT LOOKING AS SUCH. AND THERE ARE THERE'S SOME SEVERE DISREPAIR WITH THE CEILING TILES THAT ARE IN THERE. SO THAT'S INCLUDED IN THE BREAKDOWN AS WELL. AND SO WITH THE STATE CONTRACT, WE WERE ABLE TO GET THE PRICING DOWN FROM, I THINK IT HAD ORIGINALLY STARTED AT ABOUT 165 DOWN TO 82 FIVE. SO I DON'T SEE ANY LIGHTS ON AT THIS TIME. I THINK WHAT WE HAVE ATTACHED TO THE AGENDA IS LIKE JUST INVITATIONS FOR BIDS. SO I GUESS THE STATE CONTRACTS THAT THESE VENDORS ARE FROM. BUT I THINK UNLESS I'M DIDN'T CLICK ON AN ATTACHMENT, I DON'T SEE THE ITEMIZATION OF WHAT YOU'RE ACTUALLY ASKING FOR. AND SO IF YOU COULD SHARE THAT I KNOW YOU SAID YOU WENT FROM 160 TO 80 SOMETHING THOUSAND. GREAT JOB ON THAT 50% DISCOUNT. YOU MUST HAVE A MAJOR NEGOTIATION SKILLS. BUT LIKE IF YOU COULD SHARE WHAT IT IS AND THEN THE TOTAL AMOUNT, THEN WE COULD SEE IF COUNCIL WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I CAN DO THAT. I'M HAPPY TO SHARE IT.

    NOW OR THEN OR ADD IT TO MONDAY'S MEETING. WELL, THE AGENDA INDICATED ACTION MAY BE TAKEN TONIGHT, SO IF YOU NEED THE ACTION TONIGHT, IF YOU SHARE WITH US WHAT IT IS AND THE VENDORS, I THINK WE COULD APPROVE IT SINCE IT INDICATED ACTION MAY BE TAKEN. OR IF YOU WANT TO WAIT TILL MONDAY, IT'S UP TO YOU. I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S TIME SENSITIVE. IT IS FAIRLY TIME SENSITIVE, ONLY BECAUSE SOME OF THE WORK THAT WAS STARTED BY A PREVIOUS CONTRACTOR THAT WE HAD TO IMMEDIATELY STOP WORK WITH, THE OFFICE IS IN A LITTLE BIT OF DISREPAIR IN WHICH WE CANNOT ACCESS IT. I DID JUST EMAIL YOU THE QUOTE THAT WE RECEIVED FROM THE STATE CONTRACTOR THAT LISTS THE INDIVIDUAL ITEMS. ONE THING THAT I DO NOT SEE ON HERE, WE DID

    [02:55:09]

    JUST GET THIS TODAY WAS NOT THE BREAKDOWN OF THE PRICE OF EACH OF THE ITEMS, BUT IT DOES LIST ALL OF THE WORK THAT WOULD BE DONE. AND I CAN READ IT OUT. OR IF, MADAM MAYOR, YOU WANT TO SHARE YOUR SCREEN, I DID EMAIL IT TO YOU. YEAH, I SEE, I CAN'T SHARE MY SCREEN WITH YOU. CAN I GO QUESTION? I WAS GOING TO SAY IF WE DON'T TAKE ACTION ON THIS TONIGHT, IS IT POSSIBLE WE CAN GET A COUPLE PICTURES OF. SURE, I CAN GO OVER THERE. AND WE HAD A VIDEO ACTUALLY OF THE OFFICE PRIOR TO WORK BEING DONE. AND I CAN SHARE THAT AS WELL. OKAY. SO WHEN IT COMES TO THIS LAPTOP HERE ISN'T WORKING. THAT'S PLUGGED INTO THE SYSTEM. SO IF YOU EMAIL IT TO. IS YOUR EMAIL PULLED UP ON THAT ONE? NO. MADAM MAYOR, I WOULD PREFER Y'ALL HAVE ALL OF THE INFORMATION. I KNOW MR. MITCHELL JUST ASKED FOR SOME INFORMATION. WE CAN PUT IT TO MONDAY. THAT'S NO PROBLEM. SO LET'S DO IT ON MONDAY. LET'S SHOW THE VIDEO. YEP. OF THE BEFORE. LET'S SHOW. I MEAN, I DON'T THINK THERE WOULD BE ANY. DO WE HAVE ANY CONCERNS ABOUT THE TOTAL COST OR ANY OBJECTIONS? I'VE BEEN OVER THER. AND BATHROOM IS REALLY SO IF AND MONDAY IS A OFFICIAL MEETING. SO IT WILL STAY A PART OF THE RECORD AS WELL. SO WE COULD DO IT. BUT IT IS A ITEM I WAS GOING TO SAY WE COULD DO IT IN PRESENTATION, BUT IT'S MORE OF AN AGENDA ITEM THAT YOU CAN DO THE VIDEO WITH, AND WE CAN PUT IT AT THE TOP OF THE AGENDA ITEM. MADAM MAYOR, LET ME ALSO EXTEND THE INVITATION. OBVIOUSLY ONE IS NOT NEEDED, BUT COME, COME SEE IT. RIGHT. LET ME KNOW WHEN YOU WANT TO COME BY BECAUSE IT IS CARD ACCESS ONLY AND I KNOW COUNCIL MEMBER MARTIN ROGERS HAS BEEN BY COUNCILWOMAN SHROPSHIRE, HAS BEEN BY THE MAYOR, HAS BEEN BY. BUT YEAH.

    COME, COME SEE WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE BEFORE ANY WORK IS DONE. SO YOU CAN COMPARE. ALL RIGHT, MADAM CITY DEPUTY CITY CLERK AGENDA FOR THAT ONE. YOU PUT AT THE TOP OF THE AGENDA. AND OUR

    [III.15. Council Discussion and Possible Action on the Facade Grant Program to be Funded by ARPA Funds in the Amount of $350,000 (Part 2 of 2)]

    LAST ITEM IS THE ITEM NUMBER 15. MISS JESSIE.

    SORRY. IN THE AMOUNT OF $350,000, MAY CEO ROGERS IS HERE TO TALK ABOUT THAT. HE WORKED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AT YOUR DIRECTION AFTER THE LAST PRESENTATION. AND HE'S GOING TO PRESENT YOU SOME OPTIONS. THANK YOU. INTERIM CITY MANAGER MANAGER JESSE. AND GOOD AFTERNOON AGAIN, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, MISS ROGERS, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. IT WAS IN OCTOBER THAT I LAST CAME BEFORE YOU AND. I WILL PROCEED NOW WITH PROVIDING AN UPDATE TO THE PRESENTATION THAT WE PRESENTED DURING THAT TIME. SO THE CITY HAS APPROVED $350,000 TO BE USED AS A CITY WIDE FACADE GRANT INITIATIVE THAT WOULD BRING ABOUT BEAUTIFICATION INTO THE VARIOUS COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS BY IMPROVING BUILDING FACADES, ENHANCING CURB APPEAL, AND ATTRACTING MORE FOOT TRAFFIC IN THOSE COMMERCIAL AREAS, THIS WOULD BE UTILIZED. THIS WOULD UTILIZE ARPA FUNDS. AMERICAN RESCUE ACT PLAN, AND IT WOULD INVOLVE EXTERIOR REPAIR AND ENHANCEMENTS JUST FOR EDIFICATION. A COMMERCIAL DISTRICT IS A DESIGNATED AREA OF CITY SLASH TOWN PRIMARILY USED FOR COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES,

    [03:00:02]

    BUYING AND SELLING GOODS AND SERVICES. AND JUST FOR BRIEFING A AN EXAMPLE OF THOSE PRODUCTS COULD BE ANYTHING GLOVES, SHOES, SOAPS, HAMMERS, CARS, BOATS, BICYCLES, ETC. AND SERVICES COULD BE ANYTHING RANGING FROM HAIR SALONS, FOOD DELIVERY, GUTTER CLEANING, HOUSE CLEANING, WINDOW WASHING, LAWN CARE, ETC. AT THE LAST MEETING, WE DISCUSSED POTENTIAL TWO OPTIONS.

    ONE WOULD BE CITY WIDE, INCLUDING ALL FOUR DISTRICTS OR ALL FOUR WARDS A, B, C, AND D, AND AS WELL THE DOWNTOWN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. APPLICANTS COULD APPLY FOR UP TO $70,000 WITH A 25% MATCH AND THE 25% MATCH WOULDN'T BE A DIRECTIVE TO WHERE THEY HAVE TO COMMIT TO THAT. BUT IT IS STRONGLY AND WOULD BE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED IF THEY COULD COULD DO THAT MATCH.

    OPTION TWO WOULD BASICALLY JUST INVOLVE THE CENTRAL DOWNTOWN BUSINESS COMMUNITY. AND SO THAT THAT IS A SMALLER AREA DISTRICT WIDE, AND IT WOULD INVOLVE JUST THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESSES THAT WOULD BE IN THAT PARTICULAR PARTICULAR DISTRICT. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED, RIGHT? THERE WOULD BE UP TO $35,000, AGAIN, WITH A 25% MATCH. FUNDS WOULD BE, OF COURSE, ALLOCATED ACROSS THE DOWNTOWN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. SO THOSE ARE TWO PATHS THAT WE ARE ASKING YOU TO CONSIDER AS I MOVE FORWARD WITH THE PRESENTATION. SO IN YOUR PACKETS, WE HAVE A SCENARIO.

    OPTION ONE. THAT WOULD BE THOSE AREAS THROUGHOUT THE CITY. AND WE WERE INITIALLY LOOKING AT STRIP CENTERS, SHOPPING CENTERS FROM THE, THE SMALLER SIZE OF 75,000FT■!S AND GOING UP TO APPROXIMATELY 120 500 ZERO SQUARE FEET. SO IF YOU JUST TAKE THAT FIRST ITEM, THE SMALL LOCATIONS OF APPROXIMATELY 75,000FT■!S, I'M SORRY, 7500. THANK YOU, MAYOR, 7500FT■!S. AND YOU LOOK AT GOING ACROSS THE ASPHALT OVERLAY THIS WOULD BE PARKING LOT REPAIR. AND THEN OF COURSE STRIPING OF THAT PARKING LOT. THE FACADE ITSELF WOULD INVOLVE A PRESSURE WASH. AND THEN OF COURSE, THE PAINTING OF THE BUILDING. THAT TOTAL WOULD BE ALMOST $53,000. IF YOU WERE TO TAKE THE LESSER OPTION IN TERMS OF THE CHEAPER OPTION, LOOKING AT JUST THE SEALCOATING OF THE PARKING LOT, THEN THAT FEE IS JUST AT EIGHT, JUST OVER 80, $38,000. SO ABOUT $37,000 BASED ON JUST THAT. NOW FROM THAT POINT, THE SIZE IS ACTUALLY GO UP. AND THIS IS JUST TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF THE COST FOR THE FACADE IMPROVEMENT THAT WE WOULD BE LOOKING AT WITH RESPECT TO DISTRIBUTING THE MONEY EQUALLY ACROSS EACH WARD. AND I APOLOGIZE FOR THE SMALL TEXT HERE, BUT I COULDN'T GET GET IT UP BIGGER THAN WHAT YOU SEE RIGHT HERE. BUT IF YOU WERE TO LOOK AT OPTION TWO AGAIN, THIS WOULD BE JUST FOR DOWNTOWN. WE HAVE TWO A COUPLE OF SCENARIOS THAT TOP LINE, THAT TOP ITEM THERE, WHICH IS DOWNTOWN PRIMARILY THE FACADE. MATERIAL.

    AND THIS FIRST ITEM IS ACTUALLY AT THE CORNER OF DORSEY AVENUE. AND MAIN STREET. AND IF YOU WERE TO LOOK AT THAT, YOU WOULD LOOK AT THE FACADE PRESSURE WASH ONLY, FOR EXAMPLE, THE FRONT SIDE AND THE COST WOULD BE JUST OVER, JUST OVER. LET ME SEE. JUST OVER $3,000, APPROXIMATELY 5000 ALTOGETHER. HOWEVER, IF YOU WERE TO LOOK AT THAT SAME BUILDING BUT INCLUDE ALL FOUR

    [03:05:07]

    SIDES OF IT, YOU WOULD BE LOOKING AT APPROXIMATELY $19,000 JUST FOR THE PRESSURE WASHING AND THE PAINTING OF THE BUILDING ITSELF. AND THIS OF COURSE, AGAIN IS ON MAIN STREET RIGHT THERE AT THE CORNER OF DORSEY AND MAIN STREET, MOVING FURTHER. NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT AGAIN ANOTHER LOCATION IN DOWNTOWN EAST POINT. HERE WE'RE LOOKING AT, FOR EXAMPLE, WHITE WASTE STREET. AND THIS LOCATION WOULD BE 16, 11, 16, 11 WHITE WAY. AND HERE YOU WOULD BE LOOKING AT JUST THE PRESSURE WASHING OF THE BUILDING AND THE REPLACING OR GLAZING OF THE AWNINGS. YOU MIGHT BE FAMILIAR WITH THIS SITE. THIS IS THE LOCATION RIGHT THERE WHERE A THUMBS UP IS AT.

    THE RETAIL IS ON THE BOTTOM AND THE CONDOS ARE AT TOP, AND YOU HAVE THE GREEN AWNINGS THAT FRONTS THAT PARTICULAR BUILDING HERE. THE COST, IF YOU WERE GOING TO INVOLVE THE PRESSURE WASH AND THE GLAZING OF THE AWNINGS, THE COST IS QUITE DIFFERENTLY. YOU'D BE LOOKING AT ABOUT 45, $47,000 FOR JUST DOING THAT. AGAIN, PRESSURE WASHING AND REPAIRING OF THE OR REPLACING THE AWNINGS FOR THAT PARTICULAR PROCESS IN DOWNTOWN EAST POINT. ELIGIBILITY. THIS PARTICULAR APPLICATION WOULD BE OPEN TO COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE CITY OF EASTPOINTE. IS LESS THAN 120 500 ZERO SQUARE FEET, ZONED FOR COMMERCIAL AND BE IN GOOD STANDING. IN OTHER WORDS, NO OUTSTANDING FEES OWED TO THE CITY IN ANY WAY MUST PRESENT.

    THE APPLICANT MUST PRESENT A PLAN OF ELIGIBLE IMPROVEMENTS BY APPLICATION, DEADLINE. EXAMPLES OF ELIGIBLE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE NEW MULTI-TENANT SIGNAGE, EXTERIOR PAINTING AND FINISHES, MIXED USE PROPERTIES, CANOPIES, AWNINGS, WINDOWS, BUILDING FACADE REPAIRS SUCH AS BRICK SIDING, STUCCO, ETC. DECORATIVE GATES AND FENCING, LANDSCAPING, DECORATIVE PAINT PLANTERS, PARKING LOT, VISUAL BUFFERS, RE TOPPING RESTRIPING, ETC. INELIGIBLE APPLICANTS WOULD INVOLVE PACKAGE STORES, PAWNSHOPS, CONVENIENCE STORES, GAS STATIONS, RESIDENTIAL OR INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, PROPERTIES UNDER CONTRACT OR PLAN TO BE WITHIN 12 MONTHS, FORECLOSURE OR FOR SALE WOULD BE INELIGIBLE FOR THIS GRANT OPPORTUNITY AND ELIGIBLE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE INTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN, AND PLANNING SERVICES, SECURITY ROLL ROLL DOWN, CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEES, SECURITY, FENCING AND SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT, AS WELL AS TV SLASH SATELLITE EQUIPMENT, ETC. PROCESS AND TIMELINE. THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL OR SUBMISSION TIMELINE. THE APPLICANT CAN SUBMIT ONLINE OR WOULD BE ABLE TO SUBMIT ONLINE OR IN PERSON WITH NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION. THERE WOULD BE AN ELIGIBILITY REVIEW. APPLICANTS WOULD BE REVIEWED BY PROPERLY FOR PROPERTY PROPERTY ELIGIBILITY AND EVALUATED BY A COMMITTEE. FUNDING APPROVAL PROJECTS WILL BE EVALUATED BASED ON IMPACT AND FEASIBILITY. SO WE ARE CERTAINLY INTERESTED IN THOSE PROPERTIES THAT WOULD HAVE HIGH VISIBILITY AND HIGH TRAFFIC COUNT PROJECT COMPLETION. THE APPLICATION WILL OPEN, PROCESS WILL OPEN JANUARY 2025 AND MUST BE RECEIVED BY CLOSE OF BUSINESS FEBRUARY 14TH, 2025. OF COURSE, WE CAN TWEAK THE TIMING OF THIS AS NECESSARY. SELECTED APPLICANTS WOULD BE NOTIFIED BY THE END OF FEBRUARY. EARLY MARCH 2025, AND ALL AWARDEES MUST ENTER INTO A SIGNED AGREEMENT AND RECEIVE THE PROJECT AWARD. PROJECT REIMBURSEMENT FUNDS WILL BE DISBURSED UPON RECEIPT, SUBMITTAL AND VERIFICATION. VERIFICATION OF COMPLETED WORK IMPROVEMENTS MUST BEGIN WITHIN

    [03:10:04]

    60 DAYS OR TWO MONTHS OF AWARD ANNOUNCEMENT AND PROJECT COMPLETED WITHIN SIX MONTHS.

    HERE IS JUST ONE EXAMPLE OF A BEFORE AND AFTER SCENARIO THAT COULD BE POTENTIAL POSSIBILITY.

    THIS IS NOT A SPACE IN EAST POINT. AND ANOTHER SCENARIO. THIS IS JUST A STREET PROJECT, BUT JUST GIVES YOU AN IDEA OF POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS THAT COULD TAKE PLACE BASED ON A BEFORE AND AFTER SCENARIO. MARKETING AND PROMOTION OUTREACH STRATEGY. WHAT WE WOULD DO HERE IS WE WOULD HAVE A DIRECT OUTREACH APPROACH. WE WOULD SEND INFORMATION, SEND TARGETED EMAILS TO ELIGIBLE PROPERTY OWNERS THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF EASTPOINTE, WHETHER THEY ARE RESIDING HERE OR WHETHER THEY'RE JUST OPERATING THEIR BUSINESS. FROM HERE. WE WOULD MAKE SURE THAT WE SPECIFICALLY TARGET THEM AS WELL AS THEIR LOCATION OF BUSINESS OPERATION. THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT. WE WOULD CONDUCT AT LEAST ONE WORKSHOP OR WEBINAR ON GRANT BENEFITS AND APPLICATIONS AND THE APPLICATION PROCESS. WE WOULD HAVE THEN AN ONLINE CAMPAIGN WHERE WE WOULD HAVE A DEDICATED LANDING PAGE ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE. WE WOULD PUT THIS OUT THROUGH AN ON SOCIAL MEDIA. WE WOULD HAVE THIS ALSO DISTRIBUTED ON AND THROUGHOUT OUR OUR NEWSLETTER. WE WOULD HAVE PHYSICAL LOCATIONS WHERE THIS INFORMATION WOULD BE DISPLAYED, SUCH AS CITY HALL, CITY ANNEX, CUSTOMER CARE, AND WE'D ALSO DISTRIBUTE FLIERS THROUGHOUT AND AROUND THE DOWNTOWN AREA. WE WOULD ALSO PARTNER WITH AND BE IN COLLABORATION WITH BOTH OUR CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE, ATL, AIRPORT CHAMBER, AND AS WELL THE SOUTH FULTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. AND THEN, OF COURSE, WE WOULD PLACE PROMOTIONAL FLIERS IN NEARBY BUSINESSES AS STATED EARLIER. THE FLOWCHART WE WOULD BASICALLY HAVE THE FUNDING APPROVAL. SO WE'RE SEEKING YOUR APPROVAL OF THIS PROCESS. WE WOULD BEGIN OUR UPON THE APPROVAL, WE WOULD IMMEDIATELY BEGIN OUR MARKETING OUTREACH APPLICATION KICKOFF. THE APPLICATIONS WOULD BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR SELECTION, OR THEY WOULD BE DENIED FOR INELIGIBILITY. IF THEY ARE APPROVED, THEN THE APPLICATION AWARD NOTIFICATION WOULD BE CONDUCTED. THE PROJECT WOULD GET UNDERWAY WITHIN A 60 DAY SPAN. THE PROJECT, OR AT LEAST RECIPIENTS, WOULD BE REQUIRED TO MAKE PROJECT REPORTS ON A REGULAR BASIS. AND OF COURSE, THE PROJECT WOULD BE SLATED FOR COMPLETION WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF THEIR START. THIS IS A TIMELINE. TIMELINE BASICALLY OF WHERE WE ARE. IT'S DECEMBER GRANT FUNDING APPROVAL. AND THEN, OF COURSE, YOU SEE THE KIND OF TIME FRAME BASED ON JUST THE TIMELINE. THE IMPACT AND MATRIX. SO WE WOULD DO METRICS. AND SO WE WOULD DO A QUANTITATIVE METRICS. WE WOULD OBVIOUSLY LOOK AT THE NUMBER OF PROPERTIES THAT HAVE BEEN APPROVED THAT HAVE BEEN AWARDED. WE WOULD LOOK AT AND CHART INCREASE IN FOOT TRAFFIC. AND AS WELL BUSINESS REVENUE. THIS WOULD BE PRE AND POST REPORTING. AND AS WELL WE WOULD LOOK AT AND GET QUANTITATIVE METRICS WITH RESPECT TO OUR PROPERTY TESTIMONIALS AND COMMUNITY FEEDBACK REGARDING THE VISUAL IMPACT OF THE FACADE GRANT PROGRAM AND ALSO I DID CREATE TWO RATHER DETAILED APPLICATIONS THAT HAS A GREAT DEAL MORE INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT TO READ THROUGH WITH RESPECT TO THE PROGRAM AND THAT'S ALL I HAVE. THANK YOU. COUNCILMEMBER BUTLER AND COUNCIL MEMBER, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I THINK THIS IS A TREMENDOUS OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO DO SOMETHING BIG. ALTHOUGH THE FUNDS ARE ONLY $350,000, IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT WHEN WE LAST HAD THIS CONVERSATION THAT WE WERE GOING TO LOOK AT A LITTLE BIT MORE SPECIFIC, FOR EXAMPLE, IF WE WERE LOOKING TO DO SOMETHING IN OUR DOWNTOWN AREA, WE WERE THINKING ABOUT MAYBE MONUMENT SIGNS OR HOW DO WE GET ALL OF THE FACADES TO BE UNIFORMED. AND THAT TYPE OF OPTION AND SO I WAS LOOKING FOR SOMETHING WHERE WE WERE A LITTLE BIT MORE SPECIFIC ABOUT HOW WE

    [03:15:10]

    WANT THINGS TO BE IMPROVED. FOR EXAMPLE, WE HAVE WASHINGTON ROAD NEAR THE DOWNTOWN AREA WHERE WE HAVE THESE NICE LITTLE HOMES THAT ARE BUNGALOWS, BUT THEY BECOME COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES.

    MAYBE THIS IS A WAY TO MAKE IT MAKE THOSE PROPERTIES LOOK UNIFORMED IN SOME TYPE OF WAY.

    THAT'S AN INVITING TO PEOPLE. I'M INTERESTED TO HEAR WITH MY COLLEAGUE IN WARD D MAY RECOMMEND ALSO, BUT WE HAVE THE SHOPPING PLAZA ON THE CORNER OF WASHINGTON ROAD AND CAMP CREEK THAT COULD USE SOME ATTENTION. SO MY STATEMENT IS THAT HAVE WE CONSIDERED DOING A DEEPER DIVE IN TERMS OF REALLY IDENTIFYING WHAT WE WANT IT TO LOOK LIKE SO THAT WE CAN HELP THESE PEOPLE INCREASE THEIR BUSINESS, MAKE IT MORE VIABLE, AND THEREFORE MAKE THE CITY MORE INVITING. IF WE MAKE IT MORE OF A UNIFORMED APPROACH AS TO HOW WE TACKLE THIS ISSUE. YES, SIR. THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN BUTLER. CERTAINLY A DEEPER DIVE COULD COULD TAKE PLACE. I WAS WORKING UNDER THE DEADLINE OF THE FUNDING BEING ALLOCATED FOR THIS PROJECT BY THE END OF THIS MONTH. AND SO CERTAINLY WE COULD PUT A LOT MORE AND EXPEND A LOT MORE TIME IN TERMS OF TAKING A GREATER, MORE SPECIFIC FOCUS. BUT I WAS BEING VERY COGNIZANT OF THE TIMING FRAME, WHICH I'D BEEN GIVEN IN WHICH TO COME UP WITH A PLAN FOR SPENDING THE MONEY. I, COUNCIL MEMBER AT AN INDIVIDUAL IN THE MARTIN ROGERS THAT MIGHT COME BEFORE. SO WHEN WE I AM AWARE OF THE DEADLINE FOR THE ARPA FUNDS. SO IS IT. IT MUST BE IDENTIFIED HOW ARE WE GOING TO SPEND THAT MONEY BEFORE THE END OF THE YEAR? AND THAT'S WHAT. AND THEN WE CAN EXECUTE IT IN THE FOLLOWING YEAR. YES, I WAS I WAS MY IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE FUNDING HAS TO BE ALLOCATED, MEANING THAT THERE IS AN MOU IN PLACE OR A CONTRACT IN PLACE FOR REPORTING PURPOSES. AND THEN OF COURSE, THE TIME IN WHICH THAT MONEY IS TO BE EXPENDED COULD BE SIX MONTHS, COULD BE A YEAR. IT COULD BE THAT WOULD BE UP TO THE CITY'S DISCRETION. BUT BY THE END OF THIS YEAR WAS IS THE ALLOCATION BASED ON THE GRANT TIME FRAME ITSELF? AND MADAM MAYOR, I THINK THAT YOU HAD A CONCERN ABOUT ALLOCATING THE MONEY TO BUY THE. WELL, MY CONCERN IS THAT THIS IS THE FIRST TIME AND WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THIS SINCE AUGUST, THAT WE'VE BEEN TOLD THAT WE NEED THE CONTRACT. WE IF WE'RE GOING TO GO WITH THE OPTION OF FIVE AREAS A, B, C AND D, AND DOWNTOWN, WE HAVE A DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DOWNTOWN. SO IT WOULD NOT SOLELY BE IT SHOULD NOT SOLELY BE BIDEN. IT SHOULD BE THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY. AND BY THE IF WE GO WITH OPTION TWO AND WE'RE FOCUSING ONLY ON THE DOWNTOWN, IT SHOULD BE THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY. I HAVE A RECOMMENDATION FOR US TO THAT. WE HAVE ANOTHER TOOL THAT MAY ADDRESS YOUR CONCERNS IN THE WAY THAT WE ARE INTIMATELY INVOLVED. IF I'M READING BETWEEN THE LINES, WE ALSO HAVE THAT AUTHORITY THAT WE FORMED WITH FRED GARDNER WHERE WE HAVE A REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. I WOULD NOT SAY THAT ONE. NOT FOR THIS. THAT'S FOR BLIGHT. SLUM SPECIFIC AREA THAT WE DESIGNATED. I THINK THERE ARE OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE EXISTING AUTHORITIES TO GET INVOLVED IN INCENTIVES, PROVIDING INCENTIVES. BUT I DON'T THINK IF WE'RE GOING THAT ROUTE, IT SHOULD NOT SOLELY BE BIDEN. AND IT DEPENDS ON WHAT OPTION WE CHOOSE, WHETHER IT WOULD BE DDA AND BIDEN OR WHETHER IT WOULD JUST BE THE DDA. BUT THIS IS THE FIRST TIME I'M HEARING ABOUT A CONTRACT BEING REQUIRED AND THAT IT WOULD GO TO BIDEN. HERE'S THE ONE OF THE BENEFITS IF WE DID IT THE OTHER WAY, THOUGH, THE COUNCIL WOULD GET TO DECIDE AS OPPOSED TO BIDEN OR THE DOWNTOWN, THE DDA, BECAUSE THE COUNCIL MEMBERS ARE A MEMBER OF THAT AUTHORITY.

    OKAY, I HEAR YOU, BUT I'LL AND I'LL MAKE SOME MORE COMMENTS LATER THAT THAT AUTHORITY ISN'T EVEN REALLY FUNCTIONING. AND AGAIN, I THINK THERE'S IT IS A GOOD FOR OUR AUTHORITY TO START BEING MORE ACTIVE. BUT IT DEPENDS ON WHAT AREA. WHEN I WAS ON THE BUILDING AUTHORITY, A CHALLENGE WE HAD THAT WAS BACK IN 2012 IS TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WE HAVE THREE AUTHORITIES WHO DOES WHAT AND I THINK TRYING TO CONFLATE THE ISSUE BY ONLY CONTRACTING WITH THAT BUILDER FOR A DOWNTOWN AREA. WHEN WE HAVE A DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, DOESN'T HELP WITH

    [03:20:01]

    THOSE DISTINCTIONS. SO, BELLA, DID YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE COUNCIL? ATKINS. YES, I THINK IT WAS MITCHELL AND THEN MARTIN ROGERS. IS THAT WHAT I SAID? Y'ALL? I TRIED TO WRITE IT DOWN.

    OKAY. THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION. MR. ROGERS. I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS I THOUGHT THAT I HEARD INITIALLY THAT THE FUNDS HAVE TO BE OBLIGATED, BUT THEN I ALSO AM NOW HEARING ALLOCATED IN MY MIND, THERE'S A DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE TWO. YEAH. AND SO ALLOCATED IN MY MIND MEANS THAT THE FUNDS ARE THEN DISTRIBUTED. WE DON'T HAVE THESE FUNDS YET.

    CORRECT. WE DO HAVE THE FUNDS. WE HAVE THE YES. OKAY. SO YOUR PRESENTATION I SAW SOME DATES AND EARLIER I HEARD THAT THE FUNDS OR THE FUNDS, DO THE FUNDS HAVE TO BE ALLOCATED OR OBLIGATED. WHICH IS IT IN THIS CASE OBLIGATED? I THINK THAT OUR FINANCE INTERIM FINANCE DIRECTOR CAN CAN SHED MORE LIGHT ON THAT. BUT IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE FUNDS WOULD BE OBLIGATED AND ALLOCATED FOR THE BY THE END OF THIS THIS YEAR. OKAY. THEY WERE ALLOCATED OKAY. SO THEY'RE ALREADY ALLOCATED. BUT THEY NEED TO BE OBLIGATED. WELL FIRST THERE NEEDS TO BE AN APPROVAL OF THE PLAN. IF THE COUNCIL IS LOOKING TO MOVE FORWARD. AND THEN WE CAN BE VERY AGGRESSIVE ABOUT THE FUNDING. BUT YES, BY THE END OF THIS YEAR IS WHAT WE'VE BEEN WORKING TOWARDS WITH RESPECT TO GETTING THE PROGRAM UNDERWAY. WHEN YOU SAY IF THE COUNCIL IS LOOKING TO MOVE FORWARD, I THOUGHT THE COUNCIL WAS LOOKING TO MOVE FORWARD. SO WHAT IS THE PLAN FOR OBLIGATION? BECAUSE IN YOUR PRESENTATION, I SAW NO DATE. THAT GETS US TO DECEMBER 31ST. I SAW SOME DATES AROUND APPLICATION PERIOD DECISIONS AND ALL OF THOSE THINGS. SO I THOUGHT I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT WHEN YOU WENT TO GET YOUR PRESENTATION, THAT YOUR PRESENTATION WAS GOING TO TELL US HOW WE GET TO THE DECEMBER 31ST DATE OF OBLIGATION. SO DO YOU HAVE A PLAN FOR THE DECEMBER 31ST OBLIGATION? WELL, COUNCILMAN, AGAIN, THE STEP OF PRESENTING THIS EVENING, CERTAINLY FROM THIS POINT, I CAN DRAW UP A PLAN MORE DETAILED VERSUS WHAT YOU HAVE IN THE PRESENTATION BEFORE YOU. BUT WE WERE BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY I, I GOT THIS YOU KNOW, EARLIER AND I'VE BEEN WORKING THROUGH THE PROCESS BUT TRYING TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAD A, A FACADE INITIATIVE THAT WOULD BE OR COULD BE AGREED UPON. AND OF COURSE, I CAN GO BACK NOW BETWEEN NOW AND END OF THE YEAR AND WORK UP SOMETHING MORE SPECIFIC WITH WITH RESPECT TO DATES. BUT WHAT I HAVE RIGHT NOW IS IN THE PRESENTATION WITH RESPECT TO WHERE WE ARE. OKAY.

    SO I'M GOING TO USE THE PHRASE THAT HAS BEEN COINED A LOT IN THE PAST FEW WEEKS. IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU HAVE CONCEPTS OF A PLAN FOR OBLIGATIONS BY DECEMBER 31ST, BECAUSE I DON'T HEAR A VERY STRONG PLAN FOR OBLIGATION, WHICH IS WHAT WE NEED TO MOVE FORWARD, CORRECT. RIGHT. AND SO DECIDING WHICH OPTION AND ENTITY AS THE DIRECTOR FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, I MEAN, I HAVE MY THOUGHTS ON THAT BECAUSE I BELIEVE MADAM MAYOR HAD MENTIONED EARLIER, $350,000 IS NOT REALLY A WHOLE LOT OF MONEY. AND SO WE'RE LOOKING FOR GREATER IMPACT. IF WE'RE LOOKING FOR GREATER IMPACT, DO WE WANT TO CONCENTRATE THAT SO THAT WE CAN SEE THAT. SO VISUALLY IT IS A IT'S OBVIOUS THAT WE'VE INVESTED THESE DOLLARS IN THAT VERSUS SPREADING THEM ALL ACROSS. AND SO WHAT WOULD BE THE PROFESSIONAL OPINION OR RECOMMENDATION FROM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT? I THOUGHT THAT THAT'S WHAT YOU GUYS MAY PRESENT TO US AS WELL, SO THAT WE CAN GET TO THE OBLIGATION PIECE ON THAT. SO DO YOU, AS THE DIRECTOR FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, HAVE A PROFESSIONAL OPINION ABOUT HOW WE REALLY MAXIMIZE THESE DOLLARS AND REALLY IMPROVE THE ESTHETICS OF SOME OF OUR BUSINESSES? YES. I MEAN, CERTAINLY, COUNCILMAN, WITH RESPECT TO THE TWO OPTIONS, ONE PATH WOULD BE TO DISTRIBUTE THE MONEY EQUALLY ACROSS ALL FOUR WARDS IN DOWNTOWN. ANOTHER PATH WOULD BE TO FOCUS ON JUST DOWNTOWN. BASED ON THE I'M GOING TO RUN OUT OF TIME. I THINK. BUT I WANT TO STOP YOU. YES, I UNDERSTAND THE TWO OPTIONS, SURE. BUT MY QUESTION IS, AS THE DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN, WHAT WOULD BE YOUR PROFESSIONAL ADVICE FOR US TO REALLY MAXIMIZE THESE DOLLARS SO THAT WE CAN REALLY SEE AN IMPACT FOR THESE DOLLARS? YES. SO I UNDERSTAND

    [03:25:03]

    DISTRIBUTED THEM IS ONE OPTION. CONCENTRATING THEM IS ANOTHER. SO LOOK LOOK AT AREAS THAT HAS THE GREATEST VISIBILITY, THE GREATEST TRAFFIC COUNT THAT WILL ALLOW US TO AGGRESSIVELY PULL IN MORE REVENUE FROM THE OUTSIDE AS WELL AS THE INSIDE. RIGHT. SO YOU TALKED ABOUT FOOT TRAFFIC BEAUTIFICATION. YOU TALKED ABOUT ALL OF THOSE THINGS. BUT I STILL DON'T HEAR YOUR RECOMMENDATION.

    WE'RE GOING TO MOVE TO ANOTHER QUESTION. OKAY. I WANT TO GO TO YOUR PRESENTATION SPECIFICALLY ABOUT AN ELIGIBLE PROPERTIES. AND THIS MAY BE A QUESTION FOR LEGAL AS WELL IN YOUR SLIDE ABOUT INELIGIBLE PROPERTIES, YOU'VE GOT CERTAIN BUSINESSES. WOULD THAT NOT BE DISCRIMINATORY. SO IF OUR LAW ALLOWS FOR THOSE BUSINESSES TO BE HERE, THEN WHY WOULD THEY NOT BE ELIGIBLE FOR THESE DOLLARS? IF YOU'RE REFERRING TO THE IMAGES THAT I USED, I WAS TRANSFERRED TO THE PAWN SHOPS. AND THE OTHER EXCLUSION I THINK IT'S A LEGAL CITY ATTORNEY. THAT WAS ONE OF THE QUESTIONS. SO OUR OPINION, BE THAT ALL BUSINESSES WOULD BE ELIGIBLE, THAT THE ONLY REQUIREMENT IS THAT OBVIOUSLY THEY BE A BUSINESS IN THE CITY OR WHATEVER OPTION YOU GUYS CHOSE. IF IT'S JUST DOWNTOWN OR THE ENTIRE CITY, AND THAT THEY MADE APPLICATION AND OBVIOUSLY PROVIDED THE INFORMATION THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN REQUIRED BY OUR APPLICATION. RIGHT. AND I ASK THAT QUESTION BECAUSE IF I AM A IF I'M A BUSINESS OWNER AND I HAVE A BUSINESS THAT IS ONE OF THE USES THAT IS UNDER INELIGIBLE IF OUR LAW ALLOWS ME TO HAVE THAT BUSINESS HERE, THEN WHY WOULD MY BUSINESS BE SINGLED OUT AS INELIGIBLE? I MEAN, I MAY HAVE A BUSINESS THAT NEEDS A LOT OF FACADE IMPROVEMENTS TO IMPROVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SO I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT ON WHAT BASIS WAS THAT DECISION MADE, BECAUSE CLEARLY THE BUSINESS IS THERE. SO OUR ALLOW OUR LAW ALLOWS FOR THAT BUSINESS TO BE HERE. BUT NOW WE'RE SAYING THAT YOU'RE INELIGIBLE TO IMPROVE THE PROPERTY. YES. SO LET ME JUST ASK CITY ATTORNEY WHAT'S THE LEGAL RECOMMENDATION ON THAT? BECAUSE I THINK THAT'S THAT ANY BUSINESS WOULD BE INCLUDED. AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE SUGGESTED WAS THAT YOU INCLUDE THE CRITERIA, WHICH IS OBVIOUSLY THE APPLICATION DOCUMENTS THAT WOULD BE NEEDED, BUT ALSO THE EVALUATION OF WHAT IT WOULD TAKE TO BE AWARDED IT. RIGHT. LIKE IF IT'S GOING TO BE ON A YOU GET POINTS IF YOU PROVIDE IT, YOU KNOW, A UPDATE TO NOT ONLY YOUR FACADE, BUT ALSO YOUR LIGHTING, YOU KNOW, WHATEVER IT WAS, BUT THAT WE INCLUDE WHAT IT WOULD TAKE TO BE AWARDED. I THINK THE ZONING RIGHT. IN OUR ZONING LAW, WE HAVE THE CRITERIA THAT WE USE TO EVALUATE WHETHER YOU GET IT OR YOU DON'T GET THE PERMIT OR THE REZONING. SAME KIND OF, YOU KNOW, NON-ARBITRARY NONDISCRIMINATORY LANGUAGE WOULD BE NEEDED HERE, THAT THIS IS A CRITERIA THAT WOULD BE USED BY COUNCIL OR WHOEVER THE EVALUATING COMMITTEE IS, TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT YOU GET THE FUNDING OR NOT BEING WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESS YOU HAVE. THE LEGAL RECOMMENDATION IS THAT WE DON'T EXCLUDE ANYONE. EXACTLY. OKAY. SO WE CHECK THAT OUT OKAY.

    ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. I HAVE OTHER QUESTIONS, BUT I CAN'T READ MY SCRIBBLE. SO I HAVE TO GET BETTER AT THAT. SO I'LL YIELD. MADAM MAYOR. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER MITCHELL. YES, THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENTATION. ALONG THOSE SAME LINES, I DID HAVE DOWN HERE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE STUFF THAT WAS EXCLUDED. HOWEVER, COULD YOU GO BACK TO THE OPTION SLIDE? WHAT'S THE NAME? CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE OPTION SLIDE. YOU HAD UP WITH THE TWO OPTIONS. AND I WILL EVEN KIND OF CAUTION US. USING THE PHRASE DOWNTOWN BECAUSE IT WOULD INSINUATE THAT WE'RE FOCUSING ON I MEAN, WE CAN HAVE ALL FOUR WORDS, I BELIEVE DOWNTOWN TOWARD A AND I UNDERSTAND WE WANT TO, YOU KNOW, GIVE EVERYBODY AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO APPLY FOR THESE GRANTS. SO WE'RE MADAM CITY ATTORNEY, WILL WE BE LIABLE FOR ANYTHING, SAY, IF WE DID, EVEN IF I YOU THINK WE'D BE ABLE TO JUST FOCUS ON DOWNTOWN, SO EXCLUDE THE REST OF THE CITY. LOCATION IS FINE, RIGHT? IF YOU WANT TO TARGET A LOCATION THAT THAT THAT'S NOT GOING TO GIVE YOU AS MUCH OR ANY ISSUE AS WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESS, BECAUSE THEN YOU'RE GETTING SO BEYOND TIME, PLACE AND MANNER RIGHTS THAT WE HAVE THAT WE CAN REGULATE. SO LOCATION LIMITATIONS PERFECTLY OKAY. TYPE OF BUSINESS NOT SO FOR EVEN FOR SOMETHING LIKE SAY IF WE DID DECIDE TO FOCUS ON DOWNTOWN, IF THAT'S LIKE YOU SAY, THAT'S FINE. WE CAN'T FORCE STORE OWNERS TO, YOU KNOW, APPLY FOR THE GRANTS. YOU CANNOT. SO

    [03:30:07]

    IT MAY GO NOWHERE, RIGHT? IF NOBODY APPLIES RIGHT, THEN NO. YOU YOU THAT PROBLEM ABSOLUTELY.

    SO EVEN MOVING FORWARD, DO YOU THINK IF WE JUST IF WE GO WITH PLAN A, DO YOU THINK. WELL DO YOU THINK IT WOULD BE BETTER JUST TO SAY A, B, C AND D AND DOWNTOWN BECAUSE DOWNTOWN IS TECHNICALLY IN A WARD, YOU'RE SAYING EXCLUDE DOWNTOWN BECAUSE IT'S ALREADY CAPTURED IN IN.

    OKAY, THAT'S OPTION THREE. OKAY. I THINK THAT WOULD BE A THIRD OPTION TO JUST DO THE WARD, SINCE YOU'VE ALREADY CAPTURED DOWNTOWN IN ONE OF THE WARDS, THAT'S FINE, BECAUSE IT MIGHT GIVE INSINUATION THAT THEY'RE GIVING SOME TYPE OF SPECIAL, YOU KNOW, FAVORITISM. I WON'T SAY FAVORITISM, BUT I DON'T THINK OPTION ONE GETS YOU IN TROUBLE. OKAY. WHATSOEVER. IT DOESN'T BECAUSE THAT'S TIME PLACE AND MANNER RESTRICTIONS, RIGHT? IT'S THE PLACE PART OF THAT. YOU'RE FINE WITH THAT OKAY. AND THEN FOR THE BUSINESSES THAT DO APPLY, DO THEY HAVE TO HAVE LIK.

    A PLAN OF WHAT.

    SO SOME OF THAT MONEY IN FUNDING WOULD BE ALLOCATED. THIS IS NOT PART OF MY BUDGET FOR I MEAN IT JUST CAME TO ME. SO WE'RE TRYING TO, YOU KNOW, MAKE THE BEST OF WHAT WE, WE HAVE TO WORK WITH AT THIS TIME. OKAY. IT. THANK YOU. COUNCILMEMBER, AND THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR PRESENTATION, MR. ROGERS. BUT I DO REMEMBER US TALKING ABOUT THIS EARLY ON.

    EVERYONE SAID, BUT WHAT WE DISCUSSED WAS THAT STAFF WOULD COME BACK WITH A FOCUS ON ADDRESSING THE MOST DISTRESSED PLAZAS IN EACH WARD. I THOUGHT THAT WAS A PART OF OUR LAST CONVERSATION, BECAUSE I KNOW FOR ME IN WARD D, IT'S THAT WASHINGTON ROAD PLAZA WHERE SAMMY'S CHEESECAKE IS. THAT'S ONE OF THE MOST DISTRESSED AREAS OF WARD D ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE BRIDGE. I WANT TO KNOW MORE ABOUT WHEN THE LAST TIME WE TALKED ABOUT THIS, WE TALKED ABOUT AN AGGRESSIVE COMMUNITY OUTREACH APPROACH WITH TELLING PEOPLE THAT THIS IS AVAILABLE IN SHEPHERDING THEM THROUGH THE PROCESS SO THAT WE COULD REALLY SEE A CHANGE IN SOME IN SOME OF THESE PLAZAS. BUT IF I HAD MY PICK, I WOULD SAY THAT WASHINGTON ROAD PLAZA RIGHT THERE OFF OF WASHINGTON ROAD IN CAMP CREEK. SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE TIMELINE IS FOR THIS. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE OUTREACH IS. ARE WE GOING OUT TO THE PLAZAS TELLING THEM THAT THIS IS AVAILABLE, MAKING TELEPHONE CALLS TO THEM LIKE, HOW DO WE SEE THE CHANGE? LIKE ONCE THIS IS APPROVED BY COUNCIL, LIKE, WHAT IS THE TIMELINE? HOW DO WE SEE THE CHANGE? YES, MA'AM. SO YES, ONCE APPROVAL IS MADE, WE WILL BEGIN AGGRESSIVELY PUTTING TOGETHER A MARKETING PLAN WHICH WOULD AGAIN, WE WOULD BEGIN WITH REACHING OUT TO. PROPERTY OWNERS THAT WE HAVE IN OUR DATABASE.

    CUSTOMER CARE. WE ARE GOING TO PUT GROUP BOOTS ON THE GROUND IN TERMS OF DOING DOING SOME DISTRIBUTION THROUGHOUT DOWNTOWN. WE WON'T BE ABLE TO HIT EVERY BUSINESS LOCATION THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF EAST POINT, BECAUSE WE SIMPLY DO NOT HAVE THE MANPOWER FOR THAT. BUT WE WILL DO OUR BEST THROUGH OUR ELECTRONIC ELECTRONIC TOOLS TO MAKE SURE THAT FOR EVERYONE WHO HAS A BUSINESS THAT HAS, WE HAVE CONTACT INFORMATION ON, WE WILL PUT THIS OUT AGGRESSIVELY THROUGH THOSE CHANNELS TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE DOING ALL THAT WE CAN TO MAKE SURE THAT THE

    [03:35:03]

    WORD IS OUT. THE EXPOSURE IS THERE. AND OF COURSE, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE PHONE CONTACT FOR ANYBODY WHO HAS QUESTIONS. WE'LL BE ABLE TO ANSWER THAT. AND THEN OF COURSE, AGAIN, WE WOULD CONDUCT AT LEAST AT LEAST ONE COMMUNITY OUTREACH EFFORT IN PERSON OR BY WEBINAR, JUST BASED ON, AGAIN, THE TIMING THAT WE HAVE, WE WANT TO REACH AS MANY FOLKS THAT WE CAN. COUNCILMAN, MY FOLLOW UP QUESTION IS, WILL COUNCIL KNOW WHO APPLIED FOR THE GRANTS? WILL THERE BE AN UPDATE AS TO HEY, IN WARD? YES, MA'AM. WE CAN CERTAINLY SHARE THAT INFORMATION WITH YOU. SO AND SO YOU CAN LOOK FOR CHANGES IN THI. ABSOLUTELY, ABSOLUTELY ABSOLUTELY. COUNCIL MEMBER SHROPSHIRE, THANK YOU THIS. SO D BE SO THE BY THE BOARD WOULD BE THE PROCESS OF ISSUING THE FUNDING FOR THE GRANTS. YES. SO THE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY'S COME INTO PLAY BASED ON TIMING AND PROCESS. WE, WE THIS PRESENTATION WAS SIMPLY MADE ON THE TRACK THAT WE WOULD DO ALL OF THIS IN HOUSE. WE WOULD WORK WITH OF COURSE, OUR EVALUATION COMMITTEE WOULD BE MEMBERS FROM SEVERAL DEPARTMENTS. AND THEN OF COURSE WE WOULD WORK WITH OUR PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE ENGAGEMENT PROCESS OF GETTING THIS INFORMATION OUT IS CORRECT, AS WELL AS WITH OUR LAW DEPARTMENT. SO BASICALLY SO I GUESS MY QUESTION IS BY THE BOARD, THE BY THE BOARD WOULD BE THE ONE WHO, ALONG WITH YOU ALL, WOULD OVERSEE WHERE THE FUNDING GOES. WELL. AND WHO DETERMINED THAT THAT WOULD GO TO THE BY THE BOARD. BECAUSE I'M, I'M NOT SOLELY SOLE ON THE BY THE BOARD.

    IF IT'S DOWNTOWN, IF IT'S DOWNTOWN, THEN IT SHOULD GO WITH THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT. AND HERE'S SOMETHING ELSE. WE DISCUSSED THE PLAZAS IN EACH WARD. WE DID. AND WE ALSO TALKED ABOUT DOWNTOWN. AND SO HAPPENS THE DOWNTOWN IS IN WARD EIGHT. BUT GUESS WHAT? THERE ARE OTHER SEVERAL SHOPPING CENTERS THAT ARE IN WARDS, AND I DON'T THINK PEOPLE REALIZE IT. ONE, THE PIGGLY WIGGLY, THE PIGGLY WIGGLY IS IN WARD EIGHT. THAT NEEDS TO BE REDONE. THE FAMILY DOLLAR PLAZA THAT SITS ON HEADLAND IS IN WARD C, BUT YET THE WAKEFIELD PLAZA IS IN WARD EIGHT, SO YOU GOT SHOPPING PLAZAS THAT'S OVERLAPPING IN WARDS. SO FOR IT TO JUST KIND OF TARGET DOWNTOWN WHEN DOWNTOWN HAS BEEN THE MAIN TOPIC AND THE MAIN FOCAL POINT FOR YOUR RESIDENTS THAT THEY DON'T HAVE ANYWHERE TO GO AND WHY DON'T WE FIX UP DOWNTOWN? SO HERE IS SOMETHING. AND IT'S NOT GOING TO FIX IT TO THE POINT OF WHAT PEOPLE WANT IT TO LOOK LIKE. BUT IT'S A START. BUT JUST BECAUSE IT'S IN WARD EIGHT, YOU SHOULDN'T WANT TO ELIMINATE IT BECAUSE THERE'S A PLAZA IN WARD B RIGHT? I CAN'T CALL THE STREETS. NO, NOT SYLVAN, RIGHT IN THE HEART OF EAST WASHINGTON.

    THAT NEEDS TO BE FIXED UP. SO THERE ARE WHAT IS IT? BAYARD. THAT'S CORRECT. BAYARD. SO, I MEAN, IF THERE'S ENOUGH TO GO AROUND IN EVERY WARD, THEN THAT'S WHAT IT SHOULD BE. AND IF IT'S AN IF WE CAN AT LEAST DO SOMETHING TO DOWNTOWN, THEN WE SHOULD DO THAT. BUT IT SHOULD NOT BE EXCLUDED BECAUSE IT'S IN A PACIFIC WARD. I MEAN, REALLY, DID THEY GO TO THE DO A TURKEY DRIVE EVERY YEAR IN THE PIGGLY WIGGLY? AND THAT'S IN WATER? SO, I MEAN, REALLY IT'S ABOUT BUILDING UP THE COMMUNITY AND BUILDING UP THE CITY TO MAKE IT GET TO THE POINT WHERE PEOPLE WANT TO COME HERE. AND IT'S MAKING YOUR BUSINESS LOOK MORE ATTRACTIVE FOR PEOPLE TO SHOP HERE. AND WHEN WE HAD A DISCUSSION, WE TALKED ABOUT WHAT IT WOULD LOOK LIKE TO DO IT IN

    [03:40:01]

    WARD, TO DO IT IN DOWNTOWN, BECAUSE THERE'S A THE ICL GRANT IS AM I SAYING IT RIGHT, THE LCI, WHAT IS IT LCI THAT THAT IS ALSO DOWNTOWN THAT'S BUILDING UP AS WELL. SO THIS IS JUST ANOTHER TOOL TO HELP THE BUSINESS THAT ARE SAYING, LOOK, WHAT CAN YOU GIVE ME TO HELP BRING MY BUSINESS UP? THAT'S BASICALLY ALL IT'S DOING. SO IF WE HAD TO MAKE A DECISION, I WOULD DECIDE TO GO WITH ALL OF THEM, INCLUDING DOWNTOWN. BUT WE DO NEED A TIMELINE AS TO WHAT'S THE PROCESS WHEN IT'S GOING TO START, HOW WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO DO TO APPLY? HOW ARE YOU GOING TO GET THAT INFORMATION OUT THERE? BECAUSE WE'VE HAD THIS CONVERSATION BEFORE AND ALSO NOT JUST GIVING IT ALL TO THE BY THE BOARD, BUT IF IT'S DOWNTOWN, INCLUDE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BOARD, THE DDA BOARD, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT THEY DO. AND THEY COULD HELP WITH THAT PROCESS. YES, MA'AM. THAT'S EXACTLY HOW THAT WOULD BE DONE. COUNCIL MEMBER ZIEGLER, THANK YOU, MR. ROGERS, FOR COMING TONIGHT AND FOR YOUR PRESENTATION. I HAD A QUICK QUESTION ABOUT THE AMOUNT OF MONEY EACH APPLICANT CAN GET FOR EACH OPTION. SO FOR OPTION ONE, WE ARE SAYING THAT THIS IS THE OPTION THAT IS SPREAD ACROSS ALL FOUR WARDS, PLUS THE DOWNTOWN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. AND THAT EACH APPLICANT CAN APPLY UP TO 70,000. BUT THEN FOR OPTION TWO, WHICH IS JUST THE ONE DISTRICT, THEY'RE THEY CAN ONLY APPLY FOR A MUCH SMALLER AMOUNT OF MONEY WHERE IT FEELS LIKE IT. THE OPTION SHOULD BE SWITCHED. SO THAT'S BASED ON THE INFORMATION THAT WE RECEIVED FROM A CONSULTANT COUNCILWOMAN. AND IF YOU LOOK AT THE WHEN WE WHEN WE INITIALLY APPROACHED THIS, WE WERE LOOKING AT COMMERCIAL STRIP CENTERS, FOR EXAMPLE, OUT IN THE AREAS OUTSIDE OF DOWNTOWN. AND THOSE WERE IN RANGE IN SIZES OF LIKE 7500 AND UP. WE DIDN'T WANT TO GO BEYOND 125,000FT■!S BASED ON THE AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT WE WERE WORKING WITH. SO, FOR EXAMPLE, IF WE DISTRIBUTED THE 350 ACROSS ALL FIVE AREAS, IT WOULD AMOUNT TO $70,000 PER AREA. IF THERE WAS ONE SITE, SUCH AS CAMP CREEK AND WASHINGTON ROAD, THAT'S PARTICULAR STRIP CENTER. AND THAT WAS A NOTABLE LOCATION THAT YOU WANTED TO SPECIFICALLY TARGET BASED ON THE APPLICATION FROM THE APPLICANT, THAT SITE MIGHT IN FACT BE THE ONE THAT THE EVALUATION COMMITTEE WOULD VIEW AS BEING THE MOST PROMISING AND WOULD AWARD THE WHOLE AMOUNT TO THAT PARTICULAR ONE SITE. BUT THE GOAL WAS TO APPROACH IT AS EQUALLY AS POSSIBLE AND TRYING TO MAXIMIZE THE SPREAD OF THE MONEY TO VARIOUS BUSINESSES, BECAUSE WE DIDN'T WANT. IN OTHER WORDS, WE JUST WANTED TO SPREAD IT OUT AS MUCH AS WE POSSIBLY COULD. SO DOWNTOWN, YOU HAVE A SOMEWHAT OF A DIFFERENT SCENARIO FOR EXAMPLE, RIGHT THERE ALONG MAIN STREET DOWNTOWN IN THE CORE AREA. I'M TALKING THAT STRETCH OF BUSINESSES BETWEEN, LET'S SA, DORSEY UP TO WEST CLEVELAND AVENUE. YOU HAVE IN MANY CASES JUST ALONG MAIN STREET STOREFRONTS. YOU DON'T HAVE THE LEFT AND RIGHT SIDE. AND SO JUST TO PRESSURE WASH, REPLACE AWNINGS AND DO SOME LIKE TRIM PAINTING, FOR EXAMPLE, THE COST IS LESS. HOWEVER, IF YOU WERE TO LOOK AT THE FRONT AND THE BOTH SIDES HERE, THEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT A MORE FULL TYPE PROJECT. AND SO THAT'S WHY THE INFORMATION AND AGAIN I APOLOGIZE FOR THE SIZE THAT IT IS, BUT IT GIVES YOU KIND OF A BREAKOUT JUST FOR THE FRONT. THIS IS WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT. BUT IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE FRONT AND THE THREE SIDES THEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT ANOTHER AMOUNT. AND SO DOWNTOWN, YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE A LOT OF BRICK FACADES FRONTAGE WHICH WOULDN'T NECESSARILY BE PAINTED OR MAYBE SO THEN OTHER CASES YOU MIGHT HAVE STUCCO FRONT FRONTAGE AS WELL. SO WE GOT THAT DISTINCT INFORMATION FROM A BUSINESS IN EAST POINT THAT DOES THIS TYPE OF WORK. AND SO THAT'S WHY YOU HAVE THE PRICE POINT PRICE POINT DIFFERENTIAL. BUT AT THE SAME TIME, LOOKING AT HOW WE CAN BEST MAXIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF MONEY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY THAT WE'RE WORKING WITH. THANK YOU. AND IN ORDER TO

    [03:45:03]

    MAKE LIKE A DATA DRIVEN DECISION, DO WE HAVE ANY KIND OF DATA POINTS ON SOME THINGS YOU TALKED ABOUT EARLIER, LIKE, YOU KNOW, WHERE WHERE IN THE CITY HAS THE HIGHEST FOOT TRAFFIC, HAS THE IS THE MOST VISIBLE THINGS LIKE THAT? I COULD CERTAINLY WORK WITH OUR TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT, ENGINEERING. I HAVE NOT HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO DIG THAT DEEP INTO IT AGAIN, JUST DUE TO TIMING, BUT CERTAINLY I'LL REACH OUT TO MR. HALL AND SEE IF HE CAN PROVIDE US SOME TRAFFIC COUNT INFORMATION BASED ON THAT, AND GET THAT TO YOU. OKAY. THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. COUNCILMEMBER MARTIN. OKAY. AND THIS IS MY LAST JUST OBSERVATION, MR. ROGERS, YOU HAVE HEARD FROM EVERYONE ON THIS COUNCIL WITH THE PLAZAS THAT ARE NOT THE. YEAH, THE LOCATIONS THAT ARE OF GREAT CONCERN TO THEM. WHY CAN'T YOU JUST GO AFTER THOSE PLAZAS? I MEAN, ONCE ONE IS, ONCE IT IS APPROVED. BECAUSE I KNOW ON WARD D, YOU KNOW WHERE IT IS IN WARD D I'M NOT SURE ABOUT. I HEARD BAY PLAZA, BUT WHY DON'T WE JUST GO AFTER THOSE JUST TO LIKE. I MEAN, IS IT DIFFICULT JUST TO. YOU'VE HEARD THE CONCERNS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE WARDS AND. YES. SO, COUNCILWOMAN, WE CAN CERTAINLY LIST OF. I'M SORRY, BUT IF WE LIKE I KNOW FOR ME I DON'T KNOW ABOUT COUNCIL MEMBER BUTLER, BUT FOR ME, IT IS THAT WASHINGTON ROAD AND WHERE SAMMY'S CHEESECAKE IS. YES, MA'AM. AND IF EVERYONE COULD SELECT A PLAZA, THEN WE START THERE. WE START THERE. MY OTHER QUESTION IS, WHAT IF WE REMOVE THE 25% MATCH? WHEN DID WE. THE CONSEQUENCES IF THE 25% MATCH. WELL, WE WERE WE WANTED TO SUGGEST ENCOURAGE SOME INVESTMENT INTO THE PROJECT FROM THE BUSINESS OWNER. TYPICALLY GRANTS COME WITH A MATCH OF SOME DEGREE AND WE THOUGHT THAT IT WOULD BE A SHOW OF COMMITMENT AND TO THEIR PROJECT THAT THEY ARE WILLING TO PUT SOME FUNDING BEHIND IT AS WELL, TO SHOW THE SERIOUSNESS OF IT. AGAIN, WE'RE NOT REQUIRING THEM TO DO IT, BUT WE WOULD ENCOURAGE THEM TO DO IT BECAUSE WE WOULD WANT TO KNOW THAT WE HAVE A PARTNER IN THIS EFFORT. AND WHEN THE CITY IS NOT JUST TAKING ON A PROJECT, A PRIVATE PROJECT ITSELF AND FUNDING IT, AND THE QUESTION OF WHY DON'T WE JUST TARGET A PARTICULAR BUSINESS WITHIN A DISTRICT OR WARD? WE WANT IT TO BE VERY MINDFUL THAT WE DIDN'T TAKE ON A KIND OF SELECTIVE PERSPECTIVE, YOU KNOW, FROM FROM THE DEPARTMENT OR FROM THE STAFF'S VANTAGE POINT, BECAUSE WE WANT IT TO BE FAIR WITH WE WANT IT TO BE FAIR WITH THE PROCESS. BUT WE CAN CERTAINLY DO THAT. I MEAN, IF THAT'S THE. WILL AND WISH OF THE COUNCIL.

    [03:50:42]

    SO HOW DOES THE BUILDING AUTHORITY, THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE BUSINESS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WORK TOGETHER COLLECTIVELY WITH COUNCIL TO DEVELOP AND APPROVE OUR CITY? RIGHT. WE HAD THE ONE RETREAT AND WE'LL HAVE A FOLLOW UP.

    RIGHT. BUT LIKE WE ALL HAVE TO GET ON THE SAME PAGE RIGHT NOW. NONE OF THEM HAVE MONEY LIKE THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT AND BACKING IS THE CITY. SO THERE HAS TO BE CITY, MORE CITY INVOLVEMENT, ESPECIALLY ON SOMETHING LIKE THIS. SO JUST WE GOT COUNCIL MEMBER MITCHELL AND THEN I HAVEN'T SPOKEN YET. SO YES. SO I'M IN FAVOR OF EVERY WARD GETTING A DOLLAR AMOUNT. SO YOU'RE SAYING DON'T MAKE DOWNTOWN A SEPARATE DISTRICT? I, I'M AGNOSTIC ON THAT ISSUE. I JUST KNOW THAT WARD D NEEDS TO GET ITS SHARE RIGHT. I DON'T WANT TO SEE ALL THE MONEY GO TOWARDS JUST THE DOWNTOWN. OKAY. COUNCIL MEMBER MITCHELL YES, I KIND OF HAD THE SAME QUESTION. I WAS. I'VE BEEN SITTING HERE THINKING ABOUT POSSIBLY DIFFERENT WAYS WE COULD ADD MONEY TO THIS. FIRST IDEA CAME, I KNOW BARDA HAS BONDS THAT THEY COULD, BUT THEN AFTER DOING SOME RESEARCH, I THINK THE THRESHOLD MIGHT BE TOO HIGH FOR THAT. THEN I BELIEVE SO, YEAH. MR. MASON? YES, SIR. I'M SORRY. YEAH. ORDE. AND WE'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE PEOPLE IN THE AUDIENCE YELLING OUT. ESPECIALLY NOT THE CHAIR EITHER. SO COUNCIL MEMBER MARTIN HE. MITCHELL HE DID. HE SAID, SO YOU CAN FINISH YOUR BONDS, MISS. MAYBE MISS. I HAVE NO IDEA. OKAY. WELL, IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THEY DO. BUT. I LOST MY TRAIN OF THOUGHT. GO AHEAD. I'M SORRY. I WAS WRITING.

    I MAY HAVE MISSED THE QUESTION. YEAH. DOES BARDA, DO THEY HAVE BONDS? DO THEY HAVE BONDS OR FUNDS? THEY HAVE SOME FUNDS. YES, SIR. BONDS? AS IN BONDS OF BONDS. SO? SO THE COMMUNICATION IS BEING CHOPPY. THAT'S BEEN SENT REGARDING WHAT BARDA HAS, HAS BARDA ISSUED BONDS AND FROM THOSE BONDS ARE THEY RECEIVING REVENUE SUCH THAT THEY HAVE SOME FUNDING. AND IF THEY DO HAVE FUNDING, HOW MUCH FUNDING DO THEY HAVE? AND HAS THIS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE FULL BY THE BOARD, OR ARE WE JUST HAVING CONVERSATION WITH THE CHAIR WHO CAN'T MAKE A DECISION ALONE, AND WHAT AMOUNT IS BY THE SUGGESTING THAT THEY WOULD CONTRIBUTE TO THIS INITIATIVE? YES. THANK YOU MAYOR. YES. THE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BARDA DOES HAVE FUNDS. THEY HAVE ISSUED BONDS. THE AMOUNT IS, I GUESS, LESS THAN A HALF MILLION DOLLARS. BUT NO, I HADN'T TALKED WITH THAT BOARD ABOUT THIS INITIATIVE BECAUSE IT WOULD BE WE HAVE TO. YES. OKAY. SO EVEN IF WE DID WANT TO SPLIT UP, THIS IS $350,000, CORRECT. FOR THIS FACADE GRANT. SO THAT'LL BE ABOUT 87,000, 88,000 PER WARD. THAT'S CORRECT. I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT A WAY. HOW CAN WE FIND MORE MONEY? WHAT STRATEGIES ARE OUT THERE. SO WE COULD ADD TO THIS AMOUNT? YES, SIR. SO GETTING STARTED AGAIN PART OF THE STRATEGY WAS TO ENCOURAGE THE BUSINESSES TO PUT SOME SKIN IN THE GAME AS WELL.

    THAT'S THAT'S ONE WAY JUST TO LEVERAGE THAT. AND THEN OF COURSE, YOU KNOW I COULD CERTAINLY TAKE THIS TO THE BY THE BOARD AND ASK SHARE THIS WITH THEM AS WELL. IF THAT'S THE WISH OF THE BOARD. BECAUSE REALISTICALLY $88,000 PER WARD. AND THEN IF WE'RE GOING TO DO LIKE A STRIP MALL OR AN AREA, WE CAN'T FORCE PEOPLE TO PAY US THIS. EIGHT OF ITS $35,000 WOULD BE AROUND $9,000. IF IT WAS $70,000, AROUND $17,000. IF WE COULD DO THE 25% MATCH, I THINK

    [03:55:02]

    THEY MIGHT BE A PROBLEM WE RUN INTO. SO WE JUST CAN'T DO HALF A BUILDING AND SKIP A SHOP, AND YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? SO HOW COULD WE SUBSIDIZE THIS OR FIND OTHER STRATEGIES TO BRING MORE MONEY? BECAUSE EVEN IF WE WANT TO DO THIS FAIRLY AT $8,000 ISN'T A LOT FOR BOARD. SO AND EVEN WITH THE DDA, I BELIEVE THE DDA HAS BONDS TO ISSUE, DO THEY NOT? BONDS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS. SO THE BONDS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN ISSUED, THEY CAN GENERATE FUNDS OFF OF THAT WHICH MIGHT GIVE THEM FUNDING IN THEIR BUDGET. BUT THE CITY BACKS BONDS FROM THE WITH OUR FULL FAITH AND CREDIT, AND THE IDEA THAT WE POTENTIALLY WOULD DO BONDS BASED ON THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT OF THE CITY TO PROVIDE FACADE GRANTS TO PRIVATE BUSINESSES. I MEAN, I DON'T EVEN KNOW IF THAT WOULD PASS. THE GRATUITY CLAUSE, BUT THAT WOULD BE A WHOLE BUNCH OF BIG ISSUES.

    SO I THINK WHAT YOU'RE REFERRING TO, WHAT'S BEING COMMUNICATED WITH YOU ABOUT BONDS IS THEY'VE ISSUED SOME WHICH MAY HAVE GIVEN THEM SOME SOURCE OF FUNDING SUCH THAT THEY MIGHT HAVE SOME BUDGET OR SOME FUNDS. WELL, IN THE LONG RUN, LIKE I SAID, DO WE HAVE OTHER STRATEGIES? I SEE THE MATCHING PORTION THAT MIGHT POTENTIALLY BE AN ISSUE WITH A UNIFORM LOOK FOR, SAY, A STRIP MALL OR A PLAZA SOMEWHERE. LIKE I SAID, WE CANNOT FORCE BUSINESSES TO GIVE US MONEY, SO THAT MIGHT BE SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT. MOVING FORWARD. BUT YES, CERTAINLY, COUNCILMAN, WE CAN WE CAN LOOK AT STRATEGIES. TIMING IS THE BIGGEST FACTOR HERE THAT WE'RE WORKING AGAINST. ANYTHING ELSE? COUNCIL MEMBER MITCHELL OKAY. AND ALSO OKAY, I JUST THINK THAT MIGHT BE A BARRIER. I YIELD. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER CONLON. THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. SO IF WE DID, YOU TOOK 350,000 AND DIVIDED IT BETWEEN ALL FOUR WARDS. YOU'RE LOOKING AT $87,000, 87,005. YOU STILL HAVE DIFFERENT BUSINESSES THAT ARE IN THERE. SO WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT I KNOW YOU KEEP TALKING, COUNCIL MEMBER MITCHELL, YOU MENTIONED WITH A PLAZA IN THOSE DIFFERENT BUSINESSES, YOU WOULDN'T GO SPECIFICALLY TO THE BUSINESS. YOU WOULD. IF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT OVERHAULING THE PLAZA LIKE THE ONE THAT'S IN WARD D, THAT IS THE OWNER OF THAT PLAZA. SO EVERYBODY, ALL BUSINESSES KIND OF BENEFIT. THEY GET ALL THE BANG FOR THE BUCK THAT WILL BE PUT INTO IT. AND IF WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, LET'S JUST SAY WARD D WHERE THE CHEESECAKE PLAZA IS, THAT'S MR. JONES THAT OWNS THE WHOLE PLAZA. AND LET'S JUST SAY TO PAINT THE PLAZA, IT MAY BE WE'LL JUST SAY IT'S $20,000, MR. JONES. HE'D HAVE TO PUT IN $5,000. THAT'S 25% OF THAT. I DO LIKE THE INCENTIVE OF THAT. WHERE IT'S. THEY HAVE TO PUT IN SOMETHING BECAUSE IT GIVES THEM THEY HAVE SOME SKIN IN THE GAME WHEN IT COMES TO THAT. SO I THINK THAT ASPECT WORKS. SO WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THE DIFFERENT AMOUNTS, REGARDLESS FOR WHATEVER IT IS THAT IF THEY DON'T WANT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PROGRAM, IF YOU MAKE THAT A IF YOU MAKE THAT A REQUIREMENT THAT THEY, THEY HAVE TO PUT 25% IN THERE. IF THEY DON'T PLAN ON DOING IT, PUTTING IN THEIR 25%, I DON'T EVEN THINK THAT THEY'RE GOING TO APPLY FOR IT. SO AS FAR AS WHAT'S GOING TO BE THE MONEY FOR THESE PARTICULAR BUSINESSES OR WHATEVER, BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT LOOKING AT ONE PARTICULAR BUSINESS, ONE PARTICULAR STRIP MALL, GETTING THE WHOLE 87,000, IT MAY BE 4 OR 5 DIFFERENT BUSINESSES WITHIN THE WARD THAT APPLY FOR THE GRANT. CORRECT. SO IT'S NOT THOSE BIG AMOUNTS, BUT IF IT'S SOMEBODY IF I HAVE A BUSINESS AND I WANT TO IMPROVE AND LOOK AT MY BUSINESS, I NEED TO BE WILLING TO PUT SOMETHING IN IT. AND I'M NOT SAYING THAT IT'S GOING TO COST ME 87,000. IT MAY BE ONLY $10,000 THAT MY PARTICULAR BUSINESS OR MY STRIP MALL. I MAY OWN A44 BUILDING OR FOUR UNIT STRIP STRIP MALL. I CALL THEM TAXPAYERS. I MAY OWN A FOUR UNIT STRIP MALL BUILDING, AND IT MAY ONLY COST $10,000 FOR ME TO FIX UP MY BUILDING. SO I'M WILLING TO PUT IN THE $2,500. SO I THINK IF THAT'S A PART OF THE APPLICATION PROCESS THAT'S GOING TO WEED OUT ANYBODY THAT WANTS TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE FUNDS, IF THAT'S A PART OF THE PROCESS, IF THAT'S A PART OF, YOU KNOW, WHAT THEY HAVE TO DO, THEY HAVE TO PUT IN 25%. ONLY THOSE BUSINESS OWNERS THAT ARE WILLING TO PUT UP ANY MONEY IN THE FIRST PLACE WILL BE THE ONES THAT WILL APPLY FOR IT. SO I THINK WE NEED TO BE SPECIFIC IN WHAT IT IS THAT WE'RE ASKING FOR. AND I KNOW TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE. WE'RE KIND OF OPERATING ON A DEADLINE. SO DO WE HAVE ANYTHING IN PLACE THAT WE'RE PUTTING OUT TO THESE, YOU KNOW, THAT WE'RE PUTTING OUT TO THE TO THE BUSINESS OWNERS? YES. SO I'VE DRAFTED AN INITIAL APPLICATION FOR BOTH DOWNTOWN AND CITYWIDE THAT IS DETAILED. IT'S I DON'T THINK SO. ARE WE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT NOW WE SPLIT THE 354 WAYS OR FIVE WAYS. IS THAT THAT'S WHAT WE'RE DOING NOW. SO

    [04:00:01]

    WE'RE TRYING TO DECIDE IF WE'RE SPLITTING IT FIVE WAYS. IS IT ONE WAY OR FOUR WAYS? ONE 4 OR 5, ONE 4 OR 5. NOW I GOT THE FOUR. I GOT THE FIVE. IF WE DO ONE, WHAT IS THAT? WE JUST DECIDED DOWNTOWN. OH, JUST. OKA. DOWNTOWN. OKAY. OKAY. WELL, I YIELD I'M READY TO VOTE NOW.

    READY TO VOTE SO WE CAN DO SOME. THANK YOU. AND I WAS GOING TO PRETTY MUCH SAY THE SAME FOR WHEN IT COMES TO THAT 25% MATCH. BECAUSE IF YOU'RE GOING TO A PERSON WHO OWNS THE PLAZA, ALL THEY'RE GOING TO DO IS JUST PASS THAT COST ON TO THE PEOPLE IN THE PLAZA. SO YOU'RE YOU'RE GOING TO GET MORE FOR YOUR MONEY. ANYBODY WHO PUTS IN 25%, THEY'RE SERIOUS ABOUT FIXING UP THEIR BUSINESS. IF THEY DON'T WANT TO DO THE 25%, THEN THEY JUST WANT BARE MINIMUM. THEY'RE NOT GOING TO DO ANYTHING. BUT IF YOU DO A PLAZA, THEN THAT PLAZA OWNER IS JUST GOING TO DIVIDE THE COST OF WITH. HOWEVER MANY PEOPLE ARE IN THAT PLAZA TO GET THAT 25% MATCH BECAUSE THEY'RE SERIOUS ABOUT FIXING IT UP HERE. AND I LIKE OPTION ONE BECAUSE OPTION ONE IS A, B, C, AND D, AND IT COVERS DOWNTOWN CENTRAL BUSINESS. SO IT COVERS PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHING. BECAUSE IF YOU JUST SELECT IF YOU JUST DO WARD ONLY THERE'S SOME THAT HAVE TWO PLAZAS IN THEIR WARD. SO HOW DO YOU DETERMINE WHAT PLAZA NEEDS TO BE FIXED UP LIKE THERE'S PIGGLY WIGGLY, THEN THERE'S WAYFAIR, THERE'S THE ONE ON BAY YARD, THEN THERE'S THE OTHER ONE ON SYLVAN, OR WHAT'S THE OTHER ONE, SYLVAN. SO HOW DO YOU DETERMINE FROM THOSE TWO WHAT YOU WANT DONE? AND THEN THERE'S THE WASHINGTON ROAD. THERE'S THE FAMILY DOLLAR PLAZA ON THE OTHER END OF WASHINGTON ROAD ALONG WITH THE PLAZA, WEST HAM AND CHEESE CHEESECAKE IS. SO HOW DO YOU SAY OKAY, IT'S JUST D SO FOR ME, THE OPTION WOULD BE ONE BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO COVER EACH WARD WHERE EACH PLAZA GETS SOMETHING AS WELL AS YOUR DOWNTOWN CENTRAL DISTRICT. COUNCIL MEMBER MITCHELL OH IT'S STILL ON. COUNCILMAN. YES. THANK YOU. I THE WAY THAT I'M LOOKING AT THIS IS THAT WE DON'T HAVE A WHOLE LOT OF MONEY. $350,000, YOU KNOW, SPREAD ACROSS FOUR WARDS. YOU KNOW, THAT'S THAT'S NOT A WHOLE LOT OF MONEY TO DO A LOT OF STUFF. I WOULD LIKE TO SEE A LOT OF IMPACT. I WOULD SELECT OPTION TWO BECAUSE THERE'S THE MOST TRAFFIC. I WOULD ARGUE THAT WITH MARTA AND WITH IT BEING DOWNTOWN AND WITH, YOU KNOW, THAT'S WHERE WE HAVE ALL OF OUR EVENTS AND STUFF LIKE THAT. THAT'S WHERE PEOPLE, YOU KNOW, IF THEY'RE COMING TO THE CITY, THEY'RE GOING TO MOST LIKELY SEE THAT. THAT IS THAT'S MY POSITION. AND I BELIEVE THAT ONCE WE INVEST IN OUR DOWNTOWN, WE WILL GET MORE DEVELOPERS WANTING TO COME IN AND DEVELOP THE OTHER PROPERTIES THAT WE HAVE ACROSS THE CITY. AND SO THIS COULD BE THE KEY TO UNLOCK THAT PART. I ALSO HOPE THAT WE ARE, BECAUSE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT YOU KNOW, NOT NECESSARILY LIKE DILAPIDATED PROPERTIES, BUT THEY DO NEED SOME FIXING UP. I DO HOPE THAT WE'RE WORKING WITH, YOU KNOW, CODE ENFORCEMENT AND THINGS LIKE THAT TO MAKE SURE EVERYBODY'S IN COMPLIANCE BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT PARKING THE PARKING LOTS BEING RESURFACED. I BELIEVE THAT THAT'S ALREADY IN OUR CODE, THAT IT HAS TO BE, YOU KNOW, DRIVABLE AND THINGS LIKE THAT. AND, YOU KNOW, CAN'T BE YOU CAN'T HAVE A HUGE POTHOLE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PARKING LOT. SO IF WE CAN ALSO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE YOU KNOW, WORKING WITH CODE ENFORCEMENT AS WELL ON THOSE PROPERTIES THAT DON'T GET THE GRANT OR DON'T APPLY OR WHAT HAVE YOU. BUT I THAT THAT'S MY POSITION ON THIS COUNCIL MEMBER.

    ATKINS. YEAH, I'M NOT GOING TO BELABOR THE POINT. THAT IS ALSO MY POSITION ON THIS IS THAT THERE'S SUCH SO FEW DOLLARS, AND I REALLY WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE GREATEST IMPACT. AND I THINK THAT IF WE DECIDE THAT WE WANT TO CONCENTRATE THESE DOLLARS IN A VERY STRATEGIC WAY AND LEVERAGE WHAT IS ALREADY HAPPENING WITH SOME OF THE OTHER BUSINESSES IN DOWNTOWN, AND I'M NOT EVEN SURE IF WE EVEN INCLUDE THE BACKSIDE OF MARTA BUGGY WORKS AND WAGON WORKS, BUT THERE ARE SOME THINGS HAPPENING THERE. BUT I ALSO, LIKE MY COLLEAGUE MISS ZIEGLER, BELIEVE THAT IF

    [04:05:04]

    WE'RE ABLE TO DO THAT IN A VERY CONCENTRATED WAY, IT COULD ATTRACT OTHER INVESTMENT. SO WE'RE NOT JUST USING THE RAW $350,000, BUT WE'RE LEVERAGING THAT WITH SOME OF THE OTHER THINGS THAT ARE HAPPENING, GIVING THE CITIZENS SOME PLACE TO COME TO INCREASE FOOT TRAFFIC, HELP THE BUSINESSES THERE, AND THEN WE CAN STRATEGICALLY MOVE TO SOME OF THE OTHER AREAS IN THE CITY THAT ALSO NEED SOME OF THE SAME ATTENTION TO THEM. BUT IN MY MIND, IF WE TAKE THESE DOLLARS AND DIVIDE THEM, IT'S SO FEW DOLLARS. I MEAN, IT'S THE IMPACT FOR ME IS JUST NOT GOING TO BE THERE. AND I THINK THAT IT WILL BE DIFFICULT TO ATTRACT OTHER INVESTMENT AS WELL. BUT IF WE'RE ABLE TO CONCENTRATE THOSE DOLLARS FOR THE GREATEST IMPACT, I WOULD BE IN FAVOR OF THAT. COUNCILMEMBER SCHREIBER, THANK YOU. I CAN'T BELIEVE I'M GETTING READY TO SAY THIS. I THANK YOU ALL FOR WANTING TO DEVELOP DOWNTOWN, BUT THERE ARE OTHER AREAS IN THIS CITY THAT ARE IN GREATER NEED TO BE DEVELOPED, THAT THERE ARE AREAS THAT ARE REALLY DILAPIDATED, THAT ARE IN WARD A, WARD B, OR C AND WARD D. NOW WE'RE GOING TO BE FAIR ACROSS THE BOARD. WE GOTTA MAKE IT WORK BECAUSE TO NOT GIVE AND IMMA GO TO BAY YARD. THAT NEEDS SOME WORK THAT NEEDS TO BE REPAIRED. THOSE PEOPLE SHOULD NOT HAVE TO GO TO A PLAZA THAT LOOKS LIKE THAT. SAMMY. CHEESECAKE. THAT'S A LOT OF FOOT TRAFFIC. THAT PLAZA IS AWFUL.

    WAKEFIELD IS NOT AS BAD. THE FAMILY DOLLAR STORE IS NOT AS BAD, BUT IT CAN USE SOME REPAIRS. AND I AND STRONG ADVOCATE FOR DOWNTOWN. BUT SPREAD THE MONEY ACROSS THE CITY BECAUSE THERE ARE AREAS THAT NEED A WHOLE LOT OF ATTENTION THAT COULD REALLY DRAW PEOPLE TO DO WHAT YOU WANT IT TO DO. COUNCIL MEMBER ATKINS YES, I JUST I AGREE WITH YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER SHROPSHIRE. SO MY STATEMENT OF SUPPORTING OPTION TWO DOES NOT NEGATE THE FACT THAT OTHER AREAS IN THE CITY NEED HELP AS WELL. I AM TRYING TO USE THESE FUNDS IN THE MOST IMPACTFUL WAY, BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT. I MEAN, I REPRESENT WARD B WITH COUNCIL MEMBER ZIEGLER. I THINK THAT TO LEVERAGE THESE DOLLARS IN A WAY THAT WE CAN MAXIMIZE THE DOLLARS WOULD BE VERY HELPFUL FOR US. SO ME SUPPORTING OPTION TWO DOES NOT NEGATE THE FACT THAT OTHER AREAS IN THE CITY NEED WORK AS WELL. I UNDERSTAND THOSE THINGS. I AM TRYING TO PRIORITIZE THE DOLLARS THAT WE CAN GET THE MOST BANG OUT OF THE BUCK WITH THE DOLLARS, AND SO I'VE BEEN PATIENTLY WAITING. LET ME SAY THIS YOU'VE BEEN IN THREE TIMES. I HAD TO KEEP A LIST. I THINK WE NEED TO THINK ABOUT THE FACT THAT WE ARE GOING TO GET $35 MILLION FROM THE FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO CONNECT OUR EAST POINT PATH FROM THE HEADWATERS OF THE FLINT TO THE BELTLINE. I THINK WE NEED TO THINK ABOUT THE FACT THAT FIFA WORLD CUP 2026 IS COMING, AND WE HAVE THE THIRD SOCCER FIELD ON THE WORLD'S FIRST TRANSIT SOCCER LEAGUE IN OUR DOWNTOWN. I THINK WE ALL, EVERY RESIDENT IN THIS CITY BENEFIT FROM DOWNTOWN ONCE WE DEVELOP IT, AND WE HAVE THE ATTRACTIONS THERE AND THE AMENITIES THERE AND THE THINGS THAT WE'RE WORKING AROUND TOD, WE HAVE HOUSING COMING AND ALL OF THAT IN DOWNTOWN. SO I THINK AN OPTION, WHATEVER OPTION, SHOULD INCLUDE DOWNTOWN AS A SEPARATE AREA BECAUSE WE ALL NEED TO AS WE TALK ABOUT LEVERAGE FUNDING, ENSURE THAT WE ARE COMMITTING AND FOCUSING ON DOWNTOWN AND REALLY, I MEAN, WE GOT THE LIGHTS, WE GOT PLANNERS, WE GOT THE SIDEWALKS, WE GOT TO CONNECT TO THE BELTLINE, LIKE, AND WE'RE GOING TO HAVE THESE BUILDINGS WITH THESE FACADES ON DOWNTOWN. SO I THINK WHATEVER OPTION IT SHOULD BE AN OPTION AND INCLUDES DOWNTOWN AS A SEPARATE AREA FROM WARDS A, B, C AND D, THERE ARE DIFFERENT TYPES OF PLAZAS IN WARDS A, B, C AND D, ABC. AND D OUTSIDE OF DOWNTOWN HAVE RESIDENTIAL MORE RESIDENTIAL COMPONENTS AROUND THEM. SO YOU'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT AN AREA THAT IT HAS A CONCENTRATION OF COMMERCIAL, COMMERCIAL USE YOU'RE TALKING

    [04:10:03]

    ABOUT. WE DO SOMETHING OVER HERE. WE DO SOMETHING OVER THERE. WE KIND OF TALKED ABOUT SPOT ZONING A LITTLE EARLIER, RIGHT? LIKE HOW DO WE DO IT IN A WAY THAT DOESN'T LOOK SO SPOTTY AND SO CHOPPY? AND MAYBE IT'S THAT WE LOOK AT DEFINITELY MAKING DOWNTOWN AN AREA. BUT WHEN WE LOOK AT THE WARDS. SO FIRST OF ALL, IF AN APPLICANT CAN APPLY FOR UP TO $70,000 WITH AN OPTION THAT HAS A, B, C, D AND E, AND DOWNTOWN, THAT COULD BE ONE PERSON THAT COULD BE ONE BUSINESS, THAT CAN BE ONE PLAZA LIKE THAT IS NOT REALLY STRETCHING THE MONEY OR THE FUNDS TO HAVE A REAL IMPACT ACROSS THE CITY, TO THE POINT OF WHY WOULD IF WE WERE FOCUSING ON ONE AREA, WHY WOULD PEOPLE BE ABLE TO GET SMALLER AMOUNTS THAN IF WE'RE FOCUSING ON MORE AREAS? I DON'T UNDERSTAND IF WE'RE GOING TO HAVE 4 OR 5 AREAS, WHY SOMEBODY WOULD BE ABLE TO APPLY FOR $70,000 UP TO 70. THAT'S ALL THE MONEY. IF IT'S FIVE AREAS, EACH AREA ONLY GETS $70,000.

    SINCE ALL THE MONEY. SO I THINK THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT PER WARD SHOULD BE LOOKED AT. I THINK WE ALL SHOULD COMMIT INTO INVESTING IN OUR DOWNTOWN, BECAUSE THAT IS AN AREA THAT WE NEED TO LIKE, LEVERAGE FUNDS, PAY PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO. AND SO IF IT'S AN OPTION FOR THAT HAS FIVE WARDS, A LITTLE BIT MORE GOING DOWNTOWN, AND THEN SMALLER AMOUNTS THAT YOU CAN APPLY UP TO GOING TO THE WARDS WHERE MAYBE YOU CAN GET TWO PLAZAS, RIGHT. LIKE MAYBE YOU CAN GET MORE THAN ONE, ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY'RE DOING THE MATCH THAT'S GOING TO LIKE SPREAD THE MONEY RIGHT? I THINK WHATEVER OPTION AND WHATEVER ENTITY OR ENTITIES THE CITY NEEDS TO MAINTAIN CONTROL OVER THIS PROGRAM AND THE DECISIONS ABOUT HOW IT WILL BE IMPLEMENTED IN AN ELIGIBILITY AND ALL OF THAT, THEY CAN I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE ARPA FUNDS REQUIRES US TO DO AS IT RELATES TO OBLIGATING AND HAVING A CONTRACT, BUT WE CANNOT LOSE CONTROL OVER THIS PROGRAM BECAUSE WE'RE HAVING THIS HARD TIME TRYING TO MAKE A DECISION. THEN WE'RE GOING TO SPREAD IT OUT TO MORE PEOPLE. SO I THINK THAT DECISION HAS TO BE MADE BY COUNCIL. I THINK THE CITY ATTORNEY SHOULD DRAFT ALL AGREEMENTS. WE SHOULDN'T HAVE THE ATTORNEYS FOR THE DIFFERENT ENTITIES DRAFTING THOSE AGREEMENTS. WE SHOULDN'T HAVE THE APPLICANTS DRAFTING. WE SHOULD HAVE THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF EAST POINT DRAFTING WHATEVER LEGAL DOCUMENTS GO ALONG WITH THIS. AND YOU KNOW, I THINK AGAIN, IF THE DOWNTOWN AREA, CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT IS THE FIFTH AREA WHICH I REALLY, REALLY THINK IT SHOULD BE, I HEAR EVERYBODY, BUT THE MONEY IS ALREADY SCARCE. WE MIGHT NEED TO START LOOKING AT WHAT TYPES OF SUPPORT WE'RE GOING TO BE PROVIDING TO THE TO THE DIFFERENT BUSINESSES IN THE WARDS, BUT HOW CAN WE TALK ABOUT WE WANT TO BE A CITY THAT ATTRACTS PEOPLE AND HAS THINGS FOR PEOPLE TO DO, AND WE'RE NOT GOING TO FOCUS ON OR ENSURE THAT OUR DOWNTOWN AREA IS AN AREA IN ADDITION TO THE WARDS THAT WE ARE PRIORITIZING THIS TYPE OF MONEY FOR. GENERALLY, WHEN PEOPLE DO FACADE GRANTS, THEY'RE IN THE DOWNTOWN. IF YOU LOOK AT A LOT OF OTHER CITIES AND WHERE THEY FOCUS THEM, THEY ARE IN DOWNTOWN. SO I'M NOT SAYING IT HAS TO BE DOWNTOWN ONLY, BUT WE DEFINITELY NEED TO HAVE AN OPTION THAT HAS THE DOWNTOWN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AS ONE OF THE AREAS. BUT FOR TONIGHT AND FOR US TO MEET THE DECEMBER 31ST DEADLINE THAT WE JUST FOUND OUT ABOUT TONIGHT, ABOUT OBLIGATING FUNDS AND HAVING TO BE IN CONTRACT WITH SOMEBODY LIKE THIS IS SOMETHING WE SHOULD HAVE BEEN DISCUSSING A LONG TIME AGO. THE REALITY OF IT IS DDA AND RBA ARE GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE A SPECIAL CALL MEETING THIS WEEK TO BE ABLE TO EVEN ADDRESS THIS, AND WE WILL HAVE TO MAKE A DECISION EITHER. MONDAY, DECEMBER THE 16TH, WHICH I'M SURE IS EVERYBODY'S PREFERENCE HERE VERSUS TRYING TO MEET ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 23RD ON A SPECIAL CALLED MEETING TO DEAL WITH THE OBLIGATING. MR. GOLDEN, YOU LIKE THIS? I DON'T KNOW IF YOU RAISING YOU THINKING, BUT LIKE YOU KIND OF IN BETWEEN. SO IF YOU WANT TO COME UP AT THIS TIME. EXCUSE ME. OH, YEAH. THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. WE DO HAVE A MEETING. FRANK WAS DISCUSSING THIS. THERE IS AN OPTION WHERE IF COUNCIL WANTS TO KEEP CONTROL, THERE'S OPTION WHERE WE CAN HAVE IT BETWEEN CITY MANAGEMENT, WE WERE ABLE TO FIND A TEMPLATE WHERE YOU HAVE IT BETWEEN CITY MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. IT YOU WOULD HAVE IT WOULD BE LIKE A IT

    [04:15:04]

    IS AN MOU INTERGOVERNMENTAL GOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT. YES MA'AM. AND WE HAVE A TEMPLATE WHERE WE WILL HAVE TO SPELL OUT THE SCOPE AND THE DELIVERABLES. SO THAT'S AN OPTION AS WELL. SO BASICALLY THE PRESENTATION THAT HAS BEEN DESIGNED WHICH SHARES WITH US AN OPTION OF IT STAYING IN HOUSE WITH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IS POSSIBLE WITH AN INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. YES, MA'AM. OKAY. SO, MADAM MAYOR, IF YOU DON'T MIND, BECAUSE I, I FEEL LIKE I'M THE ONE THAT OPENED THIS CAN OF WORMS HERE IN THE CITY. AND SO BECAUSE I HAD SOME EXPERIENCE MANAGING ARPA FUNDS, SO I WAS JUST SAYING, HEY, THIS IS DECEMBER 31ST DEADLINE. LET'S MAKE SURE WE GOT ALL OUR PAPERWORK IN ORDER BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT TO SEND ANYTHING BACK. AND THAT'S WHEN WE STARTED TO LOOK AT WHAT FUNDS. THERE WAS A LOT OF CONVERSATION AROUND ALLOCATION VERSUS OBLIGATION. AND SO WE HAD THIS A LOT. WE'VE HAD A LOT OF ROBUST DISCUSSION IN THE PAST WEEK AROUND HOW IS THAT DEFINED HERE AT THE CITY AND WHAT WE'RE SEEING THROUGH THE TREASURY GUIDANCE IS THAT AN OBLIGATION IS A CONTRACT OR A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. IT'S A BINDING AGREEMENT THAT SAYS WHERE THESE FUNDS WILL BE GOING. IT CAN'T BE CONCEPTUAL THAT, HEY, WE MAY DO SOMETHING IN THIS AREA LATER.

    AND SO WE KNOW ONE SUREFIRE WAY IS CONTRACT WITH OUTSIDE ENTITY. THE OTHER MODEL THAT WE'RE MAKING SURE OF IS THIS INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT THAT WE THINK POTENTIALLY WE COULD JUST DO ALL THIS IN HOUSE. SO I THINK THAT WAS IMPORTANT. WE WERE ITCHING TO GET UP HERE BECAUSE WE DIDN'T WANT Y'ALL TO FEEL LIKE YOU HAD TO. WE HAD WE HAD THAT DEFINITE TONIGHT. WE BY MONDAY, OUR GOAL IS TO HAVE A DEFINITE ANSWER FOR YOU. ON IF THIS CAN BE DONE IN HOUSE OR IF THIS NEEDS TO BE. YEAH, BUT SEE, YOU ARE WAITING TO MONDAY TO MAKE THAT DECISION FOR US. GETS US HAVING A SPECIAL CALL MEETING. SO I APPRECIATE KNOWING THAT OPTION. BUT I THINK TONIGHT WE SHOULD DECIDE WHAT AREAS WE'RE GOING TO FOCUS ON BASED ON THAT. IF WE'RE GOING TO DO OUTSIDE ENTITIES, WHO THEY WOULD BE AND DECIDE THAT IF THE PREFERENCE IS TO DO INTERNAL, WE DO THAT, BUT GIVE YOU ALL THE ABILITY TO EXPLORE ALL OF THIS. SO BY THE TIME WE GET HERE ON MONDAY, IF SPECIAL CALL MEETINGS NEED TO BE HELD BY DDA AND OR BY THE LIKE, WHATEVER, ALL OF THAT IS, Y'ALL DO ALL OF THAT THIS WEEK. IF IT HAS TO BE AN OUTSIDE PERSON, IF IT CAN BE INTERNAL, I THINK THAT WOULD BE THE PREFERENCE. LIKE IT'S SO HARD FOR US TO DECIDE JUST THIS PART, RIGHT? LIKE TO THEN TRY TO LIKE HAVE A THIRD PARTY DEAL WITH IT. I MEAN, ULTIMATELY, WHATEVER HAPPENS WITH THIS FUND, PEOPLE ARE GOING TO COME TO US. THEY'RE GOING TO BLAME US. THEY'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT IT. ALL OF THIS IS CONNECTED TO US, REGARDLESS OF THE CONTRACT WITH ANYBODY OR NOT. SO KEEPING IT IN HOUSE WOULD BE PREFERABLE. BUT I THINK WE NEED THE DECISION POINTS TONIGHT ARE WHICH OPTION YOU ALL ARE GOING TO EXPLORE THE IN IN KEEPING IT IN HOUSE INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT, INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT AND THEN BASED UPON THE OPTION IF WE HAVE TO GO TO THIRD PARTY ENTITIES WHO THOSE MIGHT BE AND THEN ALL OF THIS OTHER STUFF THAT WE'RE STILL TRYING TO FLESH OUT THAT WOULD GIVE US TIME BECAUSE IT WOULD BE OBLIGATED. RIGHT? LIKE WHATEVER WE NEED TO, WE WOULDN'T NECESSARILY HAVE TO DO IT WITH A SPECIAL CALL MEETING. BUT I THINK COUNCIL, THAT'S THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE TO DECIDE TONIGHT. AND AGAIN, I AM REALLY ADVOCATING FOR US CONSIDERING OUR DOWNTOWN AS A SEPARATE DISTRICT AND MAKING AN INTENTIONAL EFFORT INTO ENSURING THAT, I MEAN, WE'VE INVESTED T-SPLOST MONEY IN DOWNTOWN.

    WE'VE INVESTED, AS COUNCILWOMAN SAID, LCI, WE'VE DONE PAVERS AND WALK WALKING PATHS. AND I MEAN, LIKE WE'VE DONE SO MUCH IN DOWNTOWN. WE STILL HAVE THESE BUILDINGS THAT HAVE NOT MADE EQUAL INVESTMENTS. EVEN THE NEW ONE THAT WAS BUILT DOWN THERE IS NOT REALLY. RIGHT. SO LIKE IF WE DON'T LEVERAGE THIS TO PROVIDE SOME LEVEL OF FOCUSED ATTENTION TO DOWNTOWN, I THINK WE'VE MISSED A HUGE OPPORTUNITY TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS A LEVEL AND DOWNTOWN BELONGS TO ALL OF US.

    ALTHOUGH IT'S IN WARD A, WE ALL BENEFIT FROM DOWNTOWN. WE WANT TO HAVE A CITY WHERE ALL OF OUR RESIDENTS COME INTO DOWNTOWN AND DON'T HAVE TO TRAVEL TO OTHER CITIES FOR QUALITY OF LIFE, YOU KNOW, ACTIVITIES, RIGHT? LIKE RETAIL, RESTAURANT, ENTERTAINMENT. AND SO THAT'S THAT'S ON ALL OF US, REGARDLESS OF WHAT WARD WE SPECIFICALLY REPRESENT. COUNCILMAN. WOO.

    THANK YOU, MADAM. SO I KNOW YOU SAID THAT THEY COULD APPLY FOR UP TO 70 OR 35,000. I THINK THE

    [04:20:03]

    BIGGEST THING IS WE JUST DON'T KNOW WHO'S GOING TO APPLY FOR WHAT. AND MAYBE IF YOU DID OPTION ONE, IT GIVES YOU LET'S JUST SAY THEY WERE THEY COULD APPLY UP TO A MAX OF 10,000.

    THAT GIVES YOU A POTENTIAL SEVEN APPLICANTS. I MEAN, BUT YOU STILL DON'T KNOW WHO'S GOING TO APPLY. YOU DON'T KNOW WHEN THEY APPLY. IT JUST MAY BE TWO PEOPLE. 1ST MAY BE 20,000 THAT THEY NEED. THE OTHER MAY ONLY JUST BE 30 30,000. THAT'S 50. SO YOU STILL GOT 20. MAY BE ABLE TO GO TO ANOTHER WARD OR SOMETHING. SO I THINK AND IT JUST KIND OF PUTS US IN A, YOU KNOW, A REAL DISADVANTAGE BECAUSE WE REALLY WE'RE VOTING ON STUFF AND WE REALLY DON'T KNOW, LIKE WHAT WE GOT $350,000 THAT WE'RE TRYING TO PUT, WE'RE TRYING TO SPIN OUT LIKE A THOUSAND DIFFERENT WAYS.

    BUT IF YOU KIND OF KNEW WHAT IT WAS THAT YOU WERE, YOU KNOW, ACTUALLY DEALING WITH, THEN I THINK IT WOULD MAKE IT A WHOLE LOT EASIER. AT FIRST, I WAS FOR SPLITTING THEM AMONGST DEPARTMENT. I MEAN, THE DIFFERENT WARDS. AND THEN I UNDERSTAND THAT WE DO NEED TO DO A FOCUS ON DOWNTOWN GETTING THE MOST IMPACT, BUT I STILL THINK IT'S ALL ABOUT SPREADING THE WEALTH. SO NOW I'M KIND OF LIKE MAKING IT THE FIVE. AT FIRST I WAS WITH THE FOUR, THEN I WAS WITH THE I'M ALL OVER THE PLACE JUST TRYING TO FIGURE THIS OUT BECAUSE THERE'S JUST SO MUCH INFORMATION AND. NOT Y'ALL, BUT IT IS Y'ALL. BUT NOT Y'ALL. BUT IT IS Y'ALL. BECAUSE EVERYTHING IS KIND OF LIKE COMING TO US AND WE'RE KIND OF LIKE AT THE 25TH HOUR TRYING TO MAKE A DECISION WHAT'S GOING TO BE BEST FOR THE CITY. IT'S JUST KIND OF HARD. SO I DON'T KNOW. AND WE'RE SORT I GUESS LIKE HUSTLING BACKWARDS BECAUSE YOU REALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT IT IS ACTUALLY LIKE. I SAY THAT WE'RE DEALING WITH TO SEE WHO WHO NEEDS WHAT AND IN WHAT PARTICULAR AREA. AND, YOU KNOW, BUT I AM DEFINITELY FOR HAVING A BUSINESS OWNERS TO PUT SOMETHING TOWARDS IT BECAUSE I, I'M ALL FOR, YOU KNOW, YOU GOT TO HAVE SOME SORT OF SKIN IN THE GAME. SO I DON'T, I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT. SO I DON'T EVEN KNOW HOW THAT'S GOING TO BE CRAFTED. THAT YOU PUT OUT.

    BECAUSE WHEN WE VOTE TONIGHT, YOU STILL HAVE TO GET THE INFORMATION OUT TO THE PEOPLE TO APPLY. SO HOW LONG DO THEY HAVE TO APPLY? SO TONIGHT I THINK WE NEED TO DEVELOP CONSENSUS AROUND AN OPTION. WE'RE NOT NECESSARILY GOING TO VOTE TONIGHT BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO BRING US BACK TO MOU OR THE DOCUMENTATION. RIGHT. BUT WE NEED TO HAVE CONSENSUS AROUND THE OPTION. THEY WOULD APPLY FROM JANUARY TO FEBRUARY 14TH. OKAY. SO THE DEADLINE THAT WE HAVE TO DO THE ONE FOR THE 31ST IS OBLIGATING THE FUNDS. OKAY. AND THAT IS WHAT THE FACTORS FOR THAT OR THE LEVERS FOR THAT IS WHICH OPTION. OKAY. WHETHER WE CAN DO IT INTERNALLY THROUGH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY MANAGER AND THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, KEEP IT ALL INTERNAL, WHICH IS WHAT WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT ALL ALONG. OR IF WE HAVE TO GO TO A THIRD PARTY ENTITY, WHO THAT WOULD BE AND THEN THEY WORK THIS WEEK TO GET ALL OF THAT DONE BY MONDAY. THE AGREEING TO THE 25% MATCH IS A GOOD PART OF THAT TOO. THE MORE WE CAN BUILD CONSENSUS AROUND, THE BETTER, RIGHT? RIGHT? THEN WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A DISCUSSION ON MONDAY, BUT THE DISCUSSION ON MONDAY GETS NARROWED AND WE HAVE THE BENEFIT OF SPENDING OVER AN HOUR ON THIS DISCUSSION TONIGHT BECAUSE WE THEN WOULD BE TALKING ABOUT AN OPTION, RIGHT, WITH WHATEVER THOSE DETAILS ARE. OKA. BUT LIKE THE OTHER STUFF. SO AND I THINK WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT IT PREVIOUSLY, COUNCIL MEMBER CUMMINGS, YOU MENTIONED IT THEN IS LIKE WE ARE SOMEWHAT PUTTING THE CART BEFORE THE HORSE BECAUSE WE DON'T KNOW HOW MANY PEOPLE WILL APPLY. WE COULD GET ZERO APPLICATIONS. WE CAN GET TEN, BUT WE NEED TO GET SOMETHING OUT THERE. RIGHT. AND THEN ONCE WE GET IT OUT THERE, WE COULD ADJUST, OKAY. RIGHT. AS LONG AS THE MONEY IS OBLIGATED.

    AND WHAT? AND THEN WE SEE WHAT THE NEED IS AND WHAT PEOPLE GO BACK AND DO. OKAY. WE CAN MAKE ADJUSTMENTS. WE JUST HAVE TO OBLIGATE THAT WE'RE USING THIS MONEY FOR THIS. CLEAR AS MUD. I GOT YOU. YEAH. BECAUSE I, I MEAN, THAT IS THE CHALLENGE WE ARE LIKE, YOU KNOW, CAN WE MAKE PEOPLE APPLY? WE WANT THIS PERSON TO APPLY. THEY THEY MIGHT NOT APPLY. WE MIGHT HAVE A LOT OF APPLICATIONS. SO I THINK THAT PART KIND OF PUTS THE CART BEFORE THE HORSE AND MAKES IT.

    IT'S NOT SOMETHING WE'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO DECIDE UNTIL WE OPEN UP THE PROGRAM. OKAY. AND THEN THE CONVERSATION AROUND FINDING ADDITIONAL FUNDS, WE JUST HAVE TO SEE WHAT THE NEED IS AND WHAT THOSE POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES ARE. OKAY. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER MITCHELL THANK YOU AGAIN. I WAS JUST JOTTING DOWN SOME NOTES. SO WE DO HAVE SOME MORE MONEY COMING FOR DEVELOPMENT FOR DOWNTOWN. YOU SAID IT WAS 35 MILLION AT SOME POINT. IS PLAYING THAT GRANT. FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IS GRANTED A REGIONAL GRANT TO EAST POINT COLLEGE PARK AND I FEEL LIKE CLAYTON MIGHT BE A PART OF IT. IT'S ABOUT $65 MILLION. OF THAT, 65 MILLION IS FOR CONSTRUCTION, 100% NO MATCH. EAST POINT WILL GET ABOUT 35 MILLION OF THAT 65

    [04:25:04]

    MILLION TO CONSTRUCT THE SEGMENTS OF THE PATH THAT WILL CONNECT THE DOWNTOWN SEGMENTS OF THE PATH OVER TO THE HEADWATERS OF THE FLINT THAT'S DOWN AT WILLINGHAM WILLINGHAM, AND CONNECT US TO THE ATLANTA BELTLINE GOING TOWARDS THE CITY. SO YEAH, SO I THINK WE SHOULD LEAVE ALL OUR OPTIONS OPEN BECAUSE WE DO HAVE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT. I WOULD FIGURE THAT SIGNIFICANT ENOUGH TO ACTUALLY MAKE A VISUAL DIFFERENCE DOWNTOWN, IF ANY. IF ANYTHING, WE NEED TO DO SOMETHING WITH THE MARTA STATION. I'M NOT SURE I WOULDN'T USE THE GRANT MONEY.

    THIS FACADE GRANT FOR THAT. I'M NOT EVEN SURE IF WE CAN, BUT WE'RE ALREADY IN THE MARTA.

    MARTA IS ALREADY HAVING A PLAN AROUND RENOVATING THEIR STATIONS AND ALLOCATING FUNDS FOR THAT.

    BUT THERE'S ALSO A TOD DESIRE. TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DESIRE AT OUR MARTA STATION. AND WHETHER OR NOT WE RENOVATE OR DEVELOP. SO THERE. THAT'S NOT THERE'LL BE OTHER POOLS OF MONEY. I MEAN, THAT'S FINE. I WOULD SAY IF ANYTHING, THAT'S MY BIGGEST CONCERN WITH THE DOWNTOWN AREA IS THE MARTA STATION. EVEN IF YOU'RE IN TRANSIT OR THAT'S REALLY THE FIRST THING YOU SEE OTHER THAN DOWNTOWN, IT DROPS YOU OFF RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF DOWNTOWN, AND IT LOOKS HORRIBLE, BUT AND COULD WE ACTUALLY DEFINE WHAT DOWNTOWN IS? I'M NOT SURE IF I ALREADY HAVE A MAP. YES WE DID WHEN WE APPROVED THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY. THERE'S A MAP. YES. OKAY. AND THIS IS I'M GUESSING THIS IS A MUCH SMALLER AREA. ANY CONCERNS THAT YOU HAVE OFF THE TOP OF THINGS THAT NEED TO BE DONE? YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? NO. NO, COUNCILWOMAN. AND I AM, YOU KNOW, HAVE THE DATES, THE TIME FRAME THAT WE'RE WORKING WITH. AND IT'S JUST A MATTER OF EXECUTING THE STRATEGY, THE PLAN OF COMMUNICATING, GETTING THE WORD OUT. OKAY. AND THEN, OF COURSE, WAITING FOR RESPONSES FROM WOULD BE APPLICANTS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE IN THE EFFORT. OKAY. AND YOU SAID YOU'RE OPEN TO I KNOW YOU HAD A LIST OF BUSINESSES THAT COULD NOT RECEIVE THAT MONEY. ARE WE OPEN TO. NO, WE LITERALLY WE CAN'T DO THAT. SO WE'RE NOT GOING TO DO THAT OKAY. OKAY. BECAUSE THAT WOULD OKAY. I HAVE ONE MORE THING. NO. THAT'S IT.

    THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER ZIEGLER. YES. THANK YOU. SO JUST TO REITERATE A COUPLE OF POINTS.

    SO THE FEDERAL MONEY THAT IS BEING ALLOCATED TO US, THAT IS SPECIFICALLY JUST THE PATH PROJECT, AND IT AND IT WILL START OVER BY THE PACKAGE STORE IN WARD B OFF OF OFF OF LEE OR MAIN STREET. AND IT GOES STRAIGHT DOWN INTO OUR DOWNTOWN. BUT THAT'S JUST THE SIDEWALK PART. THAT'S JUST THE PATH PROJECT. THAT'S NOT THAT DOESN'T HAVE THAT'S NOT GOING TO HELP US WITH IMPROVING IMPROVING THE FACADES OF ANY OF THE BUSINESSES DOWNTOWN. AND SO, YOU KNOW, LIKE DOWNTOWN, JUST THINK OF LIKE THERE'S THE PLAZA WITH THE MEAT MARKET. YOU'VE GOT WHERE OZ PIZZA IS AND THEN TECHNICALLY WHERE CHAIRS IS, THAT'S A SEPARATE BUILDING BECAUSE IT'S SEPARATED IN THE MIDDLE. SO I DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY PLAZAS THERE ARE DOWNTOWN, MR. ROGERS? I HADN'T TAKEN AN OFFICIAL COUNT, COUNCILWOMAN, BUT WE CAN CERTAINLY LOOK INTO THAT. I DON'T WANT TO MISQUOTE. YEAH. I THINK THE ONLY TECHNICAL PLAZA OF SORTS IS WHERE THE CHIKATILO'S Q'S IS. I THINK WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT. SO LET'S JUST GO DOWN MAIN STREET. WE START AND WE HAVE NOW WE HAVE EAT MY BISCUIT THERE. THERE IS SOMEWHAT OF A PLAZA, BUT THAT'S KIND OF LIKE JUST ONE LOT. YOU GO DOWN AND YOU HAVE EL ROCIO, THE NEXT BUILDING. ALL OF THOSE ARE SEPARATE. THEN WE GET TO WHERE THE OLD FLOWER COTTAGE WAS. RIGHT. THAT'S 3 OR 4 BUSINESSES.

    THEN YOU GET TO EYES PIZZA. AND ALTHOUGH THE. SOCCER FIELD IS DIVIDING THEM, I MEAN, IT KIND OF CONNECTED OF SORTS. RIGHT. AND THEN YOU TAKE THAT AROUND DOWN GOT WHITE WAY AND THEN YOU HAVE CLEVELAND LIKE THAT LITTLE RIGHT. GO AHEAD. COUNCILMEMBER. SO I THINK WHEN WE THINK ABOUT PLAZAS PER SE IN DOWNTOWN, WE HAVE MORE LIKE SECTIONS OR AREAS BECAUSE THEY'RE KIND OF DISCONNECTED, BUT THEY'RE CONNECTED. YEAH. SO I HAVE A QUESTION, DIRECTOR ROGERS. SO IN

    [04:30:07]

    YOUR EARLIER SLIDE, YOU HAD THE ADDRESS OF 2873 MAIN STREET AS A POTENTIAL PLACE THAT COULD RECEIVE FUNDS. CORRECT? WELL, IT'S JUST, YOU KNOW, THROUGHOUT THE PRESENTATION, I WANTED TO USE OBVIOUSLY SOME REAL INFORMATION AND SO JUST IDENTIFYING AT LEAST A COUPLE OF SITES THAT I FELT YOU WOULD BE FAMILIAR WITH DOWNTOWN TO KIND OF REFERENCE REALLY WHAT THE PRICE POINT THAT YOU HAVE, THE DATA ON WOULD MATCH A, A GIVEN FACILITY JUST FOR FAMILIARITY.

    BUT I'VE NOT PERSONALLY IDENTIFIED ANY SPECIFIC SITE THAT I WOULD TARGET, BUT I TRIED TO BE INCLUSIVE OF ALL SITES JUST BASED ON, YOU KNOW, THE BUSINESSES THAT WE HAVE WHO WOULD RESPOND TO THE TO THE GRANT APPLICATION PROCESS. GOT IT. SO FOR SO FOR THE PRESENTATION, WOULD YOU HAVE INCLUDED ANY BUSINESS THAT WOULD BE AN INELIGIBLE LIKE DO THEY HAVE TO BE IN A PROPER PLAZA BECAUSE 2073 IS ONE OF THE BUSINESSES THAT'S KIND OF BY ITSELF DOWNTOWN. SURE. SO YES, JUST TRYING TO BE INCLUSIVE OF ALL BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, INITIALLY THE TARGET. AT PLAZAS AND IT WAS THROUGHOUT THE CITY.

    OPTION IT SOUNDS LIKE THERE IS SOME SUPPORT OF OPTION TWO, BUT THERE'S MAYBE MORE SUPPORT FOR OPTION THAT GETS MORE AREAS. AM I RIGHT ON THAT ASSUMPTION? I THINK WE SHOULD JUST KEEP OUR OPTIONS OPEN. IF WE JUST GO WITH TWO, THEN YOU KNOW, WE DON'T KNOW HOW THIS IS GOING TO TURN OUT. RIGHT. SO IF WE GO WITH OPTION ONE, THAT GIVES US THE OPTION TO KEEP MORE THINGS OPEN. THAT'S GIVING US THE OPTION OF THROUGHOUT THE CITY JUST IN CASE. YEAH. AND FOCUSING ON DOWNTOWN RIGHT AS A SEPARATE AREA. BUT ALSO GOING THROUGHOUT THE CITY. AND WE'RE OKAY WITH OPTION ONE. SO WOULD THAT BE WOULD THAT BE OPTION ONE PLUS DOWNTOWN GIVING US FIVE AREAS VERSUS FOUR. YEAH. SO OPTION ONE IS FIVE. AND SO THEN IF WE DO DECIDE THAT WE'RE GOING TO GO WITH OPTION ONE, THEN WE'RE GOING TO ALSO TALK ABOUT THE AMOUNT THAT WE WOULD ALLOCATE FOR DOWNTOWN. YEAH. AND I THINK FOR TONIGHT IF WE CAN GET THROUGH. SO WE ALREADY GOT THE MATCH. WE ALREADY HAVE. WE PREFER TO KEEP IT IN-HOUSE. IF WE DECIDE THAT WE WANT TO GO WITH OPTION ONE, THE AMOUNT PER WARD OR AREA IS DEFINITELY UP FOR DISCUSSION, RIGHT? I THINK THAT'S A SOLID THAT WE COULD PROBABLY DELAY, BUT IF WE GO WITH OPTION ONE, WE ALSO COULD SAY TO THEM, IF IT'S NOT POSSIBLE TO KEEP IT INTERNALLY AND WE HAVE TO CONTRACT WITH THIRD PARTIES BECAUSE OPTION ONE HAS DOWNTOWN AND THE WARDS THAT WE WOULD WORK WITH DDA AND BAYADA, AND THEY WOULD HAVE ALL OF THAT TO WORK WITH THIS WEEK TO GET US TO BE ABLE TO MAKE THE

    [04:35:08]

    ULTIMATE TIME TIMELINE OR DEADLINE DECISION OF OBLIGATION AND STILL GIVE US FLEXIBILITY AROUND AMOUNTS. MY ARPA AND FUNDING FOLKS DOES. IS THAT ALL THAT TONIGHT? Y'ALL WORK ON ALL OF THAT THIS WEEK. BY MONDAY WE SHOULD HAVE WHAT WE NEED TO OBLIGATE RIGHT? COUNCIL MEMBER ATKINS, DID YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE? OH, SORRY. COUNCIL MEMBER MITCHELL I WAS GOING TO ASK, CAN WE ASK IF BECAUSE DOWNTOWN IS, I GUESS, A SMALLER AREA, IF YOU COULD, IF WE COULD GET TO LIKE A LIST OF CONCERNS, I GUESS CONCERNS YOU MAY HAVE WITH THE DOWNTOWN AREA THAT YOU GUYS WOULD LIKE TO SEE CONCERNS. CAN WE DO THAT OR I MEAN, I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE NEED TO DISCUSS, RIGHT? I THINK FOR THEM, THEY'LL THAT THEY'RE GIVING US AN OPTION WHERE WE CAN INCLUDE DOWNTOWN. OUR DOWNTOWN HAS NO THEME. LIKE YOU CAN GO TO OTHER PLACES AND THERE IS A BRICK GAME. THERE IS A FACADE, THERE'S A SIGN THEME. RIGHT. THERE'S SOMETHING THEMATIC AND THEMATIC. AM I SAYING THAT RIGHT? YEAH. THAT WE SHOULD TRY TO DO WITH THIS FOR DOWNTOWN TO COMPLEMENT THE OTHER WORK THAT'S BEING DONE. RIGHT. BUT WHAT THAT, YOU KNOW, AND MAYBE IT'S THE MAIN STREET SIDE. RIGHT. OR MAYBE OR IF WE COME UP WITH LIKE, YOU KNOW, IF WE'RE LOOKING LITERALLY STRICTLY AT FACADE, MAYBE EVERYBODY GETS A DIFFERENT THE SAME FACADE, LIKE HOW DO WE MAKE DOWNTOWN LOOK UNIFIED? BUT I THINK WE'D HAVE TIME TO TALK ABOUT THAT. RIGHT. AND LIKE, WHAT AMOUNT WOULD ALLOW FOR THAT? AGAIN, THE BUSINESSES WOULD HAVE TO APPLY. SO US GETTING TOO FAR IN THE WEEDS ON THAT, WE COULD HAVE TEN APPLICATIONS OR WE COULD HAVE ZERO, RIGHT. BUT FOR US TO NOT BE STUCK AND NOT BE ABLE TO HAVE THE PROGRAM AND GIVE US THE ABILITY TO MAKE THOSE DECISIONS, WOULD THAT INCLUDE MURALS? DO YOU THINK THAT WOULD BE ON THE LIST? MIRRORS? MURALS? YES. YEAH. MURALS THAT I SAID A MURAL FOR A PLAQUE. AND PEOPLE WERE LIKE, HOW IS THAT GOING TO HAPPEN? BUT YEAH, LIKE THAT. RIGHT. LIKE WHAT WHAT THEMATIC THING DO WE WANT IN DOWNTOWN. RIGHT. AND LIKE, HOW DO WE AGREE AND WHAT IS THAT AMOUNT. AND THEN THE REST AMOUNT FOR THE WARD COUNCIL MEMBER ATKINS. YES. OBLIGATION. BY DECEMBER 31ST.

    WHEN DO THE DOLLARS HAVE TO BE SPENT? SO OKAY. COUNCIL MEMBER JACKSON'S THE DOLLARS HAS TO BE SPENT BY DECEMBER OF 26. YEAH. SO IT JUST HAS TO BE OBLIGATED BY THE END OF THE YEAR. BUT YOU ONCE YOU OBLIGATE IT, IT CAN BE SPENT BY THE BY DECEMBER 2026. OKAY. AND I'M ASKING THAT QUESTION BECAUSE OF THIS I STILL HOLDING FAST TO HAVING THE GREATEST IMPACT WITH THE DOLLARS, BUT ALSO WORKING UNDER THE REALIZATION THAT WE COULD HAVE ONE APPLICANT, NO APPLICANTS, WE COULD HAVE 15 APPLICANTS. SO WITH THAT, I AM ALSO OPEN TO, IF THIS BODY WOULD CONSIDER AN OPTION WHERE THERE'S A FOCUS FOR DOWNTOWN. AND WE COULD ALSO INCLUDE AREAS IN THE OTHER WARDS. BUT IF WE START WITH A FOCUS FOR DOWNTOWN TO SEE WHAT TYPE OF RESPONSE THAT WE GET. BUT IF WE GO AHEAD AND OBLIGATE THOSE DOLLARS UNDER A PLAN AND SEE WHAT KIND OF DOLLARS AND SEE WHAT KIND OF INTEREST WE GET SO THAT WE CAN HAVE GREATER IMPACT THEMATICALLY, MAKING SURE THERE'S SOME UNIFICATION, MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE PREPARING OURSELVES FOR THE WORLD TO COME TO VISIT FOR FIFA AND ALL OF THOSE OTHER THINGS. AND IF THAT DOES NOT PAN OUT IN DOWNTOWN, THEN WE'VE ALSO APPROVED FOR US TO LOOK AT SOME OF THE OTHER AREAS. IF WE CANNOT GET MAXIMUM IMPACT WITH THE DOLLARS. SO THAT'S WHY I WAS ASKING THE QUESTION ABOUT WHEN DO THE DOLLARS HAVE TO BE SPENT? YES, SIR. AND I ASSUME ONE GIVES US THAT FLEXIBILITY TO CONSIDER POST OBLIGATION. COUNCIL MEMBER SHROPSHIRE, THANK YOU. AND I FEEL THAT OPTION ONE IS GOING TO GIVE US EXACTLY THAT. AND I'M ALSO GOING TO STAND STRONG AS WELL. ON HELPING THE OTHER AREAS. THE OTHER WARDS, BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT TO NEGLECT. AND I'M GOING TO KEEP GOING BACK TO BAY STREET IN WARD B THAT NEEDS HELP. SAMMY CHEESECAKE PLAZA THAT NEEDS HELP. I'M ALL FOR DOWNTOWN. I WANT TO DEVELOP DOWNTOWN. I WANT OUR DOWNTOWN TO BE WONDERFUL. I WANT PEOPLE TO COME SHOP AND HAVE RESTAURANTS IN DOWNTOWN. BUT WE ALSO HAVE AREAS THAT ARE IN RESIDENTIAL THAT NEED ATTENTION AS WELL. I THINK. SO I THINK WE ARE LEANING

    [04:40:02]

    TO OPTION ONE BECAUSE IT GIVES US THE OPTIONS, THE FLEXIBILITY TO CONSIDER TO EXPLORE, BUT TO THE POINT AROUND EITHER ALLOWING DOWNTOWN BUSINESSES TO APPLY FIRST AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS, OR STAYING DOWNTOWN DISTRICT GIVES 100,000 A, B, C AND D GETS 62 FIVE. RIGHT? COMING UP WITH AN AMOUNT THAT MAY REPRESENT A HIGHER INVESTMENT IN THE DOWNTOWN. AND STILL ALL WARDS BEING ABLE TO GET SOMETHING. BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE AND CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, ARE WE OKAY WITH OPTION ONE? OPTION ONE DOESN'T MEAN THE AMOUNT PER WARD NECESSARILY, BUT THAT WE WILL LOOK AT DOWNTOWN AND WARDS A, B, C, AND D? ARE WE OKAY WITH THAT? YES. OKAY. SO IF WE'RE OKAY WITH THAT AS A PART OF THIS, THIS WEEK, DECIDING WHETHER OR NOT WE CAN ULTIMATELY MAINTAIN INTERNAL CONTROL, WHICH IS WHAT WE PREFER, IF WE'RE DOING OPTION ONE WITH A, B, C, D AND DOWNTOWN, THEN THERE WOULD IF WE CAN'T DO IT, THERE WOULD NEED TO BE DISCUSSIONS WITH THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE DOWNTOWN PORTION AND VIDA FOR A, B, C AND D, ARE WE OKAY WITH THAT? IF WE HAVE TO DO A THIRD PARTY ENTITY THAT BECAUSE DOWNTOWN WILL BE SEPARATE AND THERE'S A, B, C AND D, WE CAN DIVIDE IT IN THAT WAY AND HAVE BOTH ENTITIES WORKING ON INCENTIVES? OKAY. SO I THINK WE'VE GIVEN Y'ALL A LOT. HAVE Y'ALL CAPTURED? YES, MA'AM. SO MONDAY WE ARE LOOKING AT OPTION 125% MATCH HAS BEEN AGREED UPON A, B, C, D AND DOWNTOWN AS DIFFERENT AREAS HAVE BEEN AGREED UPON. AND I FEEL LIKE THERE WAS SOMETHING ELSE WE AGREED UPON.

    WE AGREED TO OH, THAT WE WANT TO HAVE MAINTAIN INTERNAL CONTROL IF POSSIBLE. IF NOT, BECAUSE THERE'S FIVE AREAS IN THE DOWNTOWN IS SEPARATE. THERE WOULD NEED TO BE CONVERSATION WITH THE DDA AND BIDEN. DDA WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT. IF WE HAVE TO CONTRACT WITH A THIRD PARTY AND BIDEN WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THOSE AREAS NOT IN DOWNTOWN AND WARDS, A, B, C, AND D, OKAY, THAT'S THAT'S LEGAL. Y'ALL GOT THAT? PEOPLE TAKING NOTES? YES. BECAUSE I WOULD HATE FOR US TO HAVE TO SPEND MORE TIME ON THESE DECISIONS. AND WE CAN TALK ABOUT OTHER THINGS, BUT WE ALL HAVE CONSENSUS AROUND THIS. THE OTHER PART IS HOW MUCH PER WARD, HOW MUCH PER AREA PER WARD, HOW MUCH FOR EACH OF THE FIVE AREAS. AND WE HAVE OPTIONS OF MORE TO DOWNTOWN AND THEN FUNDING DEFINITELY TO OUR WARDS. WE HAVE OPTION THAT WAS ON THE FLOOR OF ALLOWED FOCUSING ON DOWNTOWN FIRST AND SEEING WHAT HAPPENS, WHO APPLIES AND THEN LOOKING AT THE WARDS. SO LET'S BE THINKING ABOUT THAT PART AND THEN AND LET'S, LET'S THINK ABOUT THAT PART. BECAUSE WE CAN EASILY TWEAK THE MOU FOR THAT. THAT'S JUST SIMPLE DIVISION OF MONEY OKAY. YEAH. PLEASE ADD THIS ON MONDAY. PLEASE DON'T FORGET WE RECORDING. ARE WE ON SOCIAL MEDIA SO Y'ALL CAN GO BACK AND WATCH IT OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

    [V. EXECUTIVE SESSION]

    ALRIGHTY. NOW THE QUESTION THAT I WISH I HOPE IS RHETORICAL, BUT I KNOW IT'S NOT EXECUTIVE SESSION LEGAL. MADAM, WE HAVE TWO THINGS FOR LEGAL. TO WHAT THINGS TO. I'M SORRY. REAL ESTATE LITIGATION AND PERSONNEL. WITH SETTLEMENTS. SO TWO LITIGATION, TWO LITIGATION.

    THAT'S IT. MISS JESSIE. NO, MA'AM. WE HAVE ONE REAL ESTATE. WE HAVE ONE REAL ESTATE. OKAY.

    YES. YEAH. REAL ESTATE COUNCIL. DO WE HAVE ANY UPDATES? YES. WE DO NEED ONE. AT LEAST ONE OF THOSE WITH TWO PERSONNEL. WHAT? YEAH, TWO PERSONNEL. SO WE HAVE TWO LITIGATION. TWO PERSONNEL AND TWO REAL ESTATE. SO MOTION TO ADJOURN TO IN EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR TWO PERSONNEL, ONE REAL ESTATE AND 222 REAL ESTATE AND TWO PERSONNEL, TWO TWO REAL ESTATE AND TWO LEGAL. SO I GOTCHA REAL ESTATE. SO MOVED. IS THERE A SECOND? IT'S BEEN MOVED AND PROPERLY SECONDED. ANY

    [04:45:04]

    DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN YEAH. SO YOU HAVE TO GO FOR THE. CAN WE GET A MOTION TO RECONVEN? MOTION TO RECONVENE SECOND. IT'S BEEN MOVED AND PROPERLY SECONDE. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. WE NEED A MOTION TO PROCEED. AS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION IN THE MATTER OF MAY. MILLER VERSUS CITY OF EAST POINT. SO MOVED. IT'S BEEN MOVED AND PROPERLY SECONDED. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. YOU NEED A MOTION TO PROCEED. AS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION IN MARTY'S.

    MARTY'S M A R D I S ANDREWS AND DEXTER GLOVER VERSUS CITY OF EAST POINT. SO MOVED. IT'S BEEN MOVED AND PROPERLY SECONDED. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES MOTION TO APPROVE. EXECUTIVE SESSION. MEETING MINUTES. SO MOVED, BEEN MOVED AND PROPERLY SECONDED. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIES. AND SINCE WE TOOK ACTION, LET'S GO AHEAD AND DO A MOTION TO ADJOURN ALL THOSE EXECUTIVE SESSION. SO MOVED. IT'S BEEN MOVED AND PROPERLY SECONDED. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.

    AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED. MOTION

    * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.